Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av quark
De revisionistiska
Ugly Voice Productions alltså.
De flesta avsnitten har behandlats här:
http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/
Aha, dina och bolts och Mabuses själsfränder på HoloCons, som revisionisten Scott Smith kallar den sajten:
http://p102.ezboard.com/frodohforumfrm10.showMessage?topicID=1287.topic
Citat:
"Well, a twenty-question format eludes clarification in any case, but I think the underlying premise is wrong, that there had to have been a monolithic Hoax. I do think there are key Hoaxsters and liars, however, and the dogmas of real or quasi-theology.
Basicially the 1943 Reader's Digest article by Hollywood Über-Zionist Ben Hecht lays it all out, and he even predicts the number of casualties, 6e6.
This is how the Hoax was sold to wartime Middle America. Reader's Digest was one of the largest circulation periodicals in the country and it is very, I mean very, lowbrow, i.e., for working class farmers and smalltown haberdashers and so on who pretend to be erudite because they are called "readers." Most of what they read is Norman Rockwell portraits friendly to the values and mores of simple, pious people from the Heartland.
In 1944 with the War Refugee Board, FDR and Morgenthau decided to give official imprimatur for Zionist atrocity-propaganda--and the purpose was for postwar globalist hegemony by discrediting the former enemy.
It wouldn't work to discredit all the Huns as was tried before by the Wilsonites, but if you could discredit their civilian and military leadership with warcrimes trials and "denazification," then you could rule more effectively and justify any outcome that the Good War led to--including abject appeasement of the Soviet Union (so long as they did not threaten Anglo-Saxon interests, in which case containment was still a viable option). Hitler could never be "contained" because his popular legitimacy depended upon eradicating the Versailles treaty, Germany War-Guilt and open-ended "reparations." It put the dagger to Globaloney itself.
Furthermore, FDR and his ilk needed a very good trump card in order to silence his domestic Isolationist critics who had ultimately destroyed Wilson and kept the U.S. out Versailles. Also, there wasn't any question that the USA was now the top dog because the rest of the Allied cause had been so desperate. Wilson was driven to the brink of death trying to rein in the Entente at Versailles before he had even come home to fight for ratification of this hall-of-mirrors abortion.
The Gas-Oven propaganda matured from mid-1944 until mid-1945 with the liberation of the concentration camps, with only a few refinements thereafter. Because some have been able to challenge some of these sacred cows in the media and in political trials, it is now against the law in many countries to do so. The U.S. Government has also done some significant collaboration with the Holocaust dogma, even though there are nominal traditions of free-speech that remain in force.
But eventually the dam will burst and somebody without a "Rechtsextreme" track record will risk his chemistry or other Ph.D. and throw his entire career into the crapper just for the sake of the truth, and more experts and professionals will follow. Neither side will like the outcome, most probably.
In 1944, who could have predicted it? [Treblinka escapee] Yankiel Wiernik could have simply disappeared from history and the memory of his folk. With his shameless lying, however, together with his penchant for sado-masochistic fantasies and his crazy sense of humor, he was able to turn himself into an internationally respected hero of the Holocaust cult. His autobiographical essay has influenced entire classes of intellectuals and the prosecutorial staffs of the most sophisticated Western governments. Yankiel Wiernik's lunatic and, let's face it, dirty-minded essay has become a cornerstone of the orthodox history of the Holocaust. [...] [But] I go back and forth on this one. One moment I admire the creative force behind this sado-masochistic imagery. The next moment I see it as an expression of hard-core Jewish chauvinism. [...] I can forgive Jews for telling such stories about Germans, but what can I say about academics who repeat such testimony to their students without examining it
~ Bradley R. Smith, Break His Bones (2002).
Visit HoloCons"
(Intressant tråd på RODOH, "Who started the Hoax?" med Scott Smiths underbara signaturcitat ur Bradley R. Smiths självbiografi om sitt liv som historierevisionist kursiverat av mig)
HoloCons drivs av samma drägg som modererar och kontrollerar RODOH, och ägnar sig åt att outa, trakassera, hata och hota gaskammarskeptiker. Jag förstår att du gillar dem.
Jag råkade läsa nedanstående på HoloCons, en mycket underhållande redogörelse för hur psykotikerna, judeosuprematisterna, korkskallarna och fejkarna på ARC (
http://www.deathcamps.org/ ) tvingades stänga ner sin sajt efter att ha hamnat i gräl med typerna från RODOH och HoloCons (möjligen kontrollerar dessa även "Axis History Forum", men det har jag inte undersökt än:
http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2006/10/on-demise-of-deathcampsorg-how-fakes.html
Det skulle vara intressant att kolla in de fyra timmarna film som det länkas till i trådstartarens inlägg, men tyvärr har jag inte bredband för tillfället.