Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Harald.Guldhatt
Låter lite flummigt och inte så troligt.
Vissa hävdar raka motsatsen. Ursprunget till idén handlar om just sannolikhet.
Citat:
En Boltzmann-hjärna är ett tankeexperiment som ger vid handen att det i ett oändligt universum är mer sannolikt att en hjärna med falska minnen (eller vilket annat objekt som helst) skapas spontant än att hjärnor skapas genom biologisk evolution.
https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boltzmann-hj%C3%A4rna
Tänk dig ett oändligt brus. Typ myrornas krig. På vissa ställen kommer bruset att likna någonting. Kanske något som liknar en text.
Vilken text är mer sannolik att du stöter på i bruset?
A. Texten "
En hjärna"
eller
B. Texten "
Miljarder med år och händelser i en bestämd följd, vars konsekvenser har resulterat i massor med av hjärnor som som tillslut resulterade i en hjärna"
Vissa tolkningar av kvantmekaniken lutar också åt det hållet.
Och det är egentligen samma sak med trådens ämne. Ett vanligt tankeexperiment:
Citat:
the simulation argument suggesting that if a civilization becomes capable of creating conscious simulations, it could generate so many simulated beings that a randomly chosen conscious entity would almost certainly be in a simulation. This argument presents a trilemma:
- either such simulations are not created because of technological limitations or self-destruction;
- advanced civilizations choose not to create them;
- if advanced civilizations do create them, the number of simulations would far exceed base reality and we would therefore almost certainly be living in one.
This assumes that consciousness is not uniquely tied to biological brains but can arise from any system that implements the right computational structures and processes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulation_hypothesis
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Stzj2_Rlo4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlTKTTt47WE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDdiCYTK160
Liknande tankar långt och med innan datorn:
Citat:
Human history is full of thinkers who observed the difference between how things seem and how they might actually be, with dreams, illusions, and hallucinations providing poetic and philosophical metaphors. For example, the "Butterfly Dream" of Zhuangzi from ancient China, or the Indian philosophy of Maya, or in ancient Greek philosophy, where Anaxarchus and Monimus likened existing things to a scene-painting and supposed them to resemble the impressions experienced in sleep or madness. Aztec philosophical texts theorized that the world was a painting or book written by the Teotl. A common theme in the spiritual philosophy of the religious movements collectively referred to by scholars as Gnosticism was the belief that reality as we experience it is the creation of a lesser, possibly malevolent, deity, from which humanity should seek to escape.
In the Western philosophical tradition, Plato's allegory of the cave analogized human beings to chained prisoners unable to see reality. René Descartes' evil demon philosophically formalized these epistemic doubts, to be followed by a large literature with subsequent variations like brain in a vat. In 1969, Konrad Zuse published his book Calculating Space on automata theory, in which he proposed the idea that the universe was fundamentally computational, a concept which became known as digital physics. Later, roboticist Hans Moravec explored related themes through the lens of artificial intelligence, discussing concepts like mind uploading and speculating that our current reality might itself be a computer simulation created by future intelligences.
Citat:
The most famous of all Zhuangzi stories appears at the end of the second chapter, "On the Equality of Things", and consists of a dream being briefly recalled.
昔者莊周夢為胡蝶,栩栩然胡蝶也,自喻適志與。不知周也。
Once, Zhuang Zhou dreamed he was a butterfly, a butterfly flitting and fluttering about, happy with himself and doing as he pleased. He didn't know that he was Zhuang Zhou.
俄然覺,則蘧蘧然周也。不知周之夢為胡蝶與,胡蝶之夢為周與。周與胡蝶,則必有分矣。此之謂物 化。
Suddenly he woke up and there he was, solid and unmistakable Zhuang Zhou. But he didn't know if he was Zhuang Zhou who had dreamt he was a butterfly, or a butterfly dreaming that he was Zhuang Zhou. Between Zhuang Zhou and the butterfly there must be some distinction! This is called the Transformation of Things.
Men spelar det någon roll? Nix!
Cogito, ergo sum