Hoffmann oversatter Gunther Deckerts rapport fran rattegangens dag tva:
http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2006/11/holocaust-denial-trial-in-germany-day.html
Citat:
a) The Scientific Attitude: Germar explained the vital importance of the scientific attitude in human affairs, referring to several prominent authorities cited by the prosecution, who stressed the importance of the “human compulsion to know the truth.” He described himself as an “eternally curious researcher with a compulsion to know, and incapable of submitting to the compulsion to believe, or accept on faith.” (At this point, Female Judge Number Two dedicated her full attention to massaging her eyes):shoot2:
9 skolbarn var narvarande bland ahorarna men var alla borta efter lunchpausen. Kanske deras larare fruktade att Rudolfs ord skulle sa katterska tankar hos nagon av dem?
Rapport fran dag tre:
http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2006/12/scientist-chained-hand-and-foot-at-his.html
Inkvisitorerna i krypto-diktaturen Tyskland fortsatter, trots tidigare loften, att halla Rudolf i fotbojor under rattegangen, antagligen for att ge intrycket av att Rudolf ar en farlig och desperat brottsling.
De verkligt farliga brottslingarna ar de som haller i domarklubborna och de som star bakom dessa prostituerade jurister och tillskyndare av ett upplysningsfientligt och fortryckande system.
Citat:
Germar next gave his definition of the “Unter Wissenschaft” (under scientific norms.) Following this he spoke about the legal ramifications of his own trial, comparing it with events in a historic trial he named only at the end of his speech. He described both trials as political trials and witch burnings, again making his points very effectively.
When he finally “let the cat out of the bag,” the comparison was with Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s trial as described in his Gulag Archipelago. The paralells between the two trials were unmistakable. The revelation had a noticeable effect on the female lay jurist as well as District Attorney Grossmann who was nervously fidgeting with his ballpoint pen during this time. Germar observed that the Court understands exactly what is expected of it from “on high” and will act accordingly.
Rapport fran dag 4:
http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/Dissenters1/Rudolf/6December2006.htm
Citat:
The indictment and arrest warrant contain the following:
Charge No. 1: He expressed approval of the conduct of the Hitlerian government against Jews.
Charge No. 2 (implicit in Charge No. 1): He expressed “moral exoneration” for leaders of the Third Reich.
Charge No. 3: His conduct thus makes an impression on his readers, thus producing “Incitement.”
Charge No. 4: He violated official taboos, especially in his advertising brochure.
Germar addressed these points in considerable detail, introducing evidence and pointing out that they are presented in much greater detail in his most recent book, Lectures on the Holocaust (available on the Internet at
www.vho.org/GB/Books/loth/