Krigsbrottsutredaren Marc Garlasco i SvD artikel säger:
"Utredaren övertygad: Det var inget luftangrepp".
https://www.svd.se/a/dwe3QB/utredaren-bildbevis-talar-mot-luftangrepp-mot-sjukhuset-i-gaza
"Fadel Naim, a doctor at the hospital, was there at the time of the strike. He told her that people had sought refuge in the hospital's courtyard when suddenly there was this huge explosion."
"Something burst into flames in the air above the hospital, and that's followed immediately by a huge fireball in that courtyard where people have gathered."
"a few experts, including Marc Garlasco. He's a former targeting officer in the U.S. military ... that based on the video of the explosion and the photos of the aftermath, it's not really consistent with standard Israeli munitions."
"Looking at the visual evidence from this strike, it's very clear to me that it was not an airstrike ... and that's because Israeli bombs typically leave craters. They spew shrapnel everywhere. They create a shockwave that would have caused more damage to the buildings surrounding this courtyard."
Samma expert säger bara att det INTE var ett israeliskt flyganfall, men säger däremot inte vad det KAN ha varit. Möjligheterna går från:
"Could it have been a Palestinian rocket that fell? Maybe. Some sort of non-standard Israeli weapon? Perhaps. A missile intercept? There's just not enough to go on."
"I've seen the Israelis and the Palestinians make terrible, deadly mistakes - both of them."
https://www.npr.org/2023/10/18/1206897199/what-we-know-about-the-origins-of-the-explosion-at-a-gaza-hospital
