Citat:
Anti-semiter? Fraga: Vilken ar den storsta semitiska gruppen?
Ursprungligen postat av FredPhelps
Fly med svansen mellan benen? Tillåt mig gapskratta 
-> http://www.coxandforkum.com/archives/06.08.08.SnatchingDefeat-X.gif
Nej, Israel kommer aldrig att försvinna, hur mycket ni anti-semiter än vill det.
-> http://www.coxandforkum.com/archives/06.08.08.SnatchingDefeat-X.gifNej, Israel kommer aldrig att försvinna, hur mycket ni anti-semiter än vill det.
Dessutom har de satans fega IDF-svinen redan brutit vapenvilan genom ett anfall mot en pastadd vapenleverans. Det ar inte zionistsatanisternas sak att gora vilket framgar klart och tydligt av resolution 1701.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cenk-uygur/alan-dershowitz-argues-it_b_26750.html
Citat:
It's ironic that a man who throws around charges of prejudice (anti-Semitism) doesn't mind being blatantly prejudiced himself. For Dershowitz, Lebanese civilians deserve to be killed - read his post - that is exactly what he is saying. But Israeli civilians, I am sure, are God's children. If anyone touches them, they are terrorists.
He claims that many of the "civilians" in Lebanon help, support, house and financially provide for Hezbollah fighters who kill Israeli civilians. Under that logic, all Israeli civilians help, support, house and financially provide for Israeli soldiers who kill Lebanese civilians. So, are they all fair game?
Israelis' tax money directly goes to support the Israeli bombs being dropped on Lebanese women and children. Every man and woman in Israel must serve in the Israeli army (actually the white Jews, Druze and Circassians, but that covers most of the country). And almost every single household has supported an Israeli soldier at some point. Guilty!
Remember I am not making this argument. Alan Dershowitz is. All I am doing is taking his logic about the Lebanese civilians and applying it to Israeli civilians. I do not support his logic. I condemn it.
He also says the Israel has warned the Lebanese that they must move out of their homes, otherwise they could be killed. How considerate. I wonder how Dershowitz would feel if someone dropped a leaflet on his front porch telling him that if he doesn't immediately move out of his house, he will be killed. Would he feel like he got a fair warning and the only appropriate action was to run away?
Let's put that hypothetical question aside for now (and I cannot emphasize enough that it is a hypothetical; he is the one arguing for actual violence here, not me). Let's get to reality. Hassan Nasrallah has gone on television and warned the civilians of Haifa, Tel Aviv and all of Israel that Hezbollah will be firing rockets into their cities. According to Dershowitz's logic, they have been warned and if they stay, they are "complicit."
Israel gives warning. Then kills civilians. Hezbollah gives warning. Then kills civilians.
He claims that many of the "civilians" in Lebanon help, support, house and financially provide for Hezbollah fighters who kill Israeli civilians. Under that logic, all Israeli civilians help, support, house and financially provide for Israeli soldiers who kill Lebanese civilians. So, are they all fair game?
Israelis' tax money directly goes to support the Israeli bombs being dropped on Lebanese women and children. Every man and woman in Israel must serve in the Israeli army (actually the white Jews, Druze and Circassians, but that covers most of the country). And almost every single household has supported an Israeli soldier at some point. Guilty!
Remember I am not making this argument. Alan Dershowitz is. All I am doing is taking his logic about the Lebanese civilians and applying it to Israeli civilians. I do not support his logic. I condemn it.
He also says the Israel has warned the Lebanese that they must move out of their homes, otherwise they could be killed. How considerate. I wonder how Dershowitz would feel if someone dropped a leaflet on his front porch telling him that if he doesn't immediately move out of his house, he will be killed. Would he feel like he got a fair warning and the only appropriate action was to run away?
Let's put that hypothetical question aside for now (and I cannot emphasize enough that it is a hypothetical; he is the one arguing for actual violence here, not me). Let's get to reality. Hassan Nasrallah has gone on television and warned the civilians of Haifa, Tel Aviv and all of Israel that Hezbollah will be firing rockets into their cities. According to Dershowitz's logic, they have been warned and if they stay, they are "complicit."
Israel gives warning. Then kills civilians. Hezbollah gives warning. Then kills civilians.
