Citat:
Knappast! Sedan fanns det en utredning som inte alls nämnde om de blide misshandlade som krossa testikler. https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_...stigation.htmlJag är på tjänsteresa i två veckor, och ni lyckas solka ner hela forumet med era barnsliga personangrepp och lögner. "Dr T" har aldrig "ägt" en enda person på detta forum, någonsin. I det ovanstående inlägget från den gode doktorn så ljuger han t.ex. om att påståenden om krossade testiklar bara kommer från "förnekare" och "förnekarsidor", trots att det är allmänt accepterat att tyskar bl.a. fick testiklarna krossade som en del i sin tortyr, vilket bl.a. framgår i Rudolf Aschenauers Macht gegen Recht. Det har även dokumenterats i Der Malmedy-Prozeß av Tiemann, och av den amerikanska utredaren E.L. van Roden, som utnämnts för att undersöka amerikanska övergrepp på tyska fånger, som öppet erkände efter sin utredning att:
All but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases we investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. This was Standard Operating Procedure with American investigators.
Det är främst sista delen det rör sig om. Report of Subcommittee of the Committee on Armed Services . . . October 13, 1949
Där står bland annat.
”The subcommittee also heard members of the administrative staff of the prison,25 who were responsible for the care and guarding of the prisoners. These witnesses had no self-interest in this matter, and testified strongly and definitely to the fact that there was NO physical mistreatment of the prisoner. This testimony was particularly con- vincing, since it included the testimony of the doctors and medical enlisted personnel who were assigned to Schwabisch Hall for the pur- pose of caring for the suspects in this case.”
Från en annan utredning av fall om misshandel .... bland annat krossa testiklar
”U.S. Senator Hunt, a committee member, personally interviewed Jochen Peiper, Sepp Dietrich, and the other SS convicts at Landsberg Prisonon 6 September 1949 to determine the validity of their accusations of mistreatment.
These interviews and the transcripts of the interviews reveal a pattern of falsehoods, gross distortions, and impossible fantasies. One by one, the grossly inflated allegations
were proven to be outright false or grossly misrepresented and exagerrated. Out of the 137 men who had claimed their ”testicles were destroyed,” none were destroyed.
Although Peiper claimed a Polish Army guard damaged one of his testicles, examination proved he had a slightly swollen testicle and likely caused his own injury to give his fraudulent claim a vestige of credence. One convict admitted the purpose of the allegations was to save them from the gallows and long prison terms they had expected to escape.”
