Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Ahyw
Den Osmanska riket tvångskonverterade generellt inte sina undersåtar. Det säger sig självt; kristna existerar än idag i det som en gång var Osmanskariket.
Förstår du att katoliker bedrev korståg på Balkan för att tvångskonvertera diverse sekter, långt innan Osmanerna ens kom till området?
Bogomilerna i Bulgarien som ett typexempel m.fl.
Katoliker bedrev krig mot dessa sekter, mördade de, tog de som slavartilbaka till Italien osv innan Osmanskariker erövrade området.
Detta ledde naturligtvis att det i befolkninen där växte en misstro mot kristendomen och dess våldsamhet mot avikande ideer m.m.
Vilket ledde till att diverse stammar i området frågade efter hjälp av osmanerna som skydda mot korstågen samt enklare tog tills sig islam och konverterade frivilligt.
Du snackar så mycket skit, sluta sprida Islamistisk propaganda, du vet att Islam är en religion av svärdet. Inte en religion av fred.
1. Jizya, d.v.s. en speciell skatt som var mycket högre för ickemuslimer tvingar ickemuslimer att konvertera om de inte har tillräckligt med kapital. Även social och ekonomisk press, då muslimska lagar gällde i Ottomanska riket.
2. Islam attackerade väst långt innan korstågen skedde, sluta ljuga.
http://i.imgur.com/3pGaNKF.jpg
Citat:
The expansion of Islam continued in the wake of Turkic conquests of Asia Minor, the Balkans, and the Indian subcontinent.[9] The earlier period also saw the acceleration in the rate of conversions in the Muslim heartland while in the wake of the conquests the newly conquered regions retained significant non-Muslim populations in contrast to the regions where the boundaries of the Muslim world contracted, such as Sicily and Al Andalus, where Muslim populations were expelled or forced to Christianize in short order.[9] The latter period of this phase was marked by the Mongol invasion (particularly the siege of Baghdad in 1258) and after an initial period of persecution, the conversion of these conquerors to Islam.
In Balkan history, historical writing on the topic of conversion to Islam was, and still is, a highly charged political issue. It is intrinsically linked to the issues of formation of national identities and rival territorial claims of the Balkan states. The generally accepted nationalist discourse of the current Balkan historiography defines all forms of Islamization as results of the Ottoman government's centrally organized policy of conversion or dawah. The truth is that Islamization in each Balkan country took place in the course of many centuries, and its nature and phase was determined not by the Ottoman government but by the specific conditions of each locality. Ottoman conquests were initially military and economic enterprises, and religious conversions were not their primary objective. True, the statements surrounding victories all celebrated the incorporation of territory into Muslim domains, but the actual Ottoman focus was on taxation and making the realms productive, and a religious campaign would have disrupted that economic objective.
Ottoman Islamic standards of toleration allowed for autonomous "nations" (millets) in the Empire, under their own personal law and under the rule of their own religious leaders. As a result, vast areas of the Balkans remained mostly Christian during the period of Ottoman domination. In fact, the Eastern Orthodox Churches had a higher position in the Ottoman Empire, mainly because the Patriarch resided in Istanbul and was an officer of the Ottoman Empire. In contrast, Roman Catholics, while tolerated, were suspected of loyalty to a foreign power (the Papacy). It is no surprise that the Roman Catholic areas of Bosnia, Kosovo and northern Albania, ended up with more substantial conversions to Islam. The defeat of the Ottomans in 1699 by the Austrians resulted in their loss of Hungary and present-day Croatia. The remaining Muslim converts in both elected to leave "lands of unbelief" and moved to territory still under the Ottomans. Around this point in time, new European ideas of romantic nationalism started to seep into the Empire, and provided the intellectual foundation for new nationalistic ideologies and the reinforcement of the self-image of many Christian groups as subjugated peoples.
A Bangladeshi family in Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Over 3 million Bangladeshi migrants live in Saudi Arabia as of 2010.[57]
As a rule, the Ottomans did not require followers of Greek Orthodoxy to become Muslims, although many did so in order to avert the socioeconomic hardships of Ottoman rule[58] One by one, the Balkan nationalities asserted their independence from the Empire, and frequently the presence of members of the same ethnicity who had converted to Islam presented a problem from the point of view of the now dominant new national ideology, which narrowly defined the nation as members of the local dominant Orthodox Christian denomination.[59] Some Muslims in the Balkans chose to leave, while many others were forcefully expelled to what was left of the Ottoman Empire.[59] This demographic transition can be illustrated by the decrease in the number of mosques in Belgrade, from over 70 in 1750 (before Serbian independence in 1815), to only three in 1850.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spread_of_Islam
3. Typisk turk som skyller allt på kurder och icke-muslimer. Vad kommer du att säga nästa gång? Armenier kastar ut folk ifrån balkongen? Turkar kan inte hantera historien. Ni hatar kurder för att de är ursprungsfolk i Mellanöstern, Mederna. Tvyärr så har även kurderna blivit rasblandade till någon blandras av turkfolk och semiter.
Ni är ett simpelt steppfolk utan kultur. Européer har större besittningsrätt på Anatolien än vad ni har. Hetiterna, m.fl. var våra folk.
