Citat:
seriöst?
Lyssna inte personen som använder Riks som källa, läs istället https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com...efsa.2021.6905
du länkar till korruptionsorganet EU och EFSA där hälften av personalen har intressekonflikter och andra hälften säkert också är öppen för mutor i rätt storleksklass.
vad får du ut av att försöka få folk att använda mjölkprodukter som kan göra dom sjuka?
Conflicts of interests
The EFSA has been criticised, including by the European Court of Auditors in 2012,[16] for "frequent conflicts of interests",[17][18][19][20][21][22] some of them undeclared.[23][24] A number of undisclosed conflicts of interest involved the International Life Sciences Institute.[23]
According to Corporate Europe Observatory, in 2013, 58% of the experts of the agency were in situation of conflict of interests.[25] In 2017, they were still 46% in situation of conflict of interests.[25]
Bisphenol A
EFSA has also been criticised by the NGO CHEM Trust for misrepresenting the results of their expert committee's report on bisphenol A (BPA) in January 2015. EFSA claimed in the abstract, press release and briefing that bisphenol A 'posed no risk' to health, when the expert report actually stated the risk was 'low' when considering aggregate exposure (beyond just food).[26] EFSA later modified the abstract to correct this error,[27] though the press release remains unchanged.[28] EFSA have argued that use of 'no health concern' in their press release and bisphenol A briefing is to ensure these materials are accessible, though this rationale is disputed by CHEM Trust.[29]
bisphenol A är ett gift som EFSA sagt att det heller inte utgör någon risk.