Det förstår ju alla att det är Bannon som är arkitekten bakom. Men goda ledare vet att omge sig med de rätta personerna. Vi kan jämföra med vad som hände nyligen under "förintelsens minnesdag" när vita huset tog tempen på "alla människors lika värde" i praktiken. Det går som vi alla känner till bra att bedyra läpparnas bekännelser till denna Kulturmarxistiska trossats så länge alla rättar sig efter de inofficiella heliga skrifterna och är införstådda i den på förhand uppskissade hackordningen i offerhierakin. Låt oss säga som så att alla inte uppskattade jämlikhet.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/white-house-holocaust-jews-234572
Bannon vet:
http://forward.com/news/breaking-news/362181/stephen-bannon-described-jews-as-enablers-of-jihad-in-old-film-treatment/
Påfallande självkritiskt identifieras stora delar av den mediala strategin mot Trump baserat på hopkokta föreställningar att administrationen skulle vara "paranoid". Ett klassiskt scenario där man ljugit så mycket (och letts i vanföreställningar) att man låtit sig övertygats om sin egen riktighet och låtit det varit en drivkraft i rapporteringen. Administrationen har inte alls varit paranoida utan snarare svalt betet och lett media i den riktningen för att skapa överreaktioner och rubriker. Under tiden som medierna (av de som dristat sig till självkritik) omgrupperar väljer Vita Huset att lägga om strategin tillfälligt för att - i deras svagaste stund - avkräva dom ett påstående - inte för deras egen skull (dom blir ju bara dumförklarade) utan för att stärka legitimiteten och för det amerikanska folkets skull.
http://europe.newsweek.com/donald-trump-versus-media-548562?rm=eu
Trump kommer bli bästa presidenten sedan JFK minst.
Citat:
The State Department drafted its own statement last month marking International Holocaust Remembrance Day that explicitly included a mention of Jewish victims, according to people familiar with the matter, but President Donald Trump’s White House blocked its release.
The existence of the draft statement adds another dimension to the controversy around the White House’s own statement that was released on Friday and set off a furor because it excluded any mention of Jews. The White House has stood by the statement, defending it as an “inclusive” message that was not intended to marginalize Jewish victims of the Holocaust.
According to three people familiar with the process, the State Department’s Office of the Special Envoy on Holocaust Issues prepared its own statement for International Holocaust Remembrance Day that, like previous statements, commemorated Jewish victims.
The White House’s explanations for omitting Jews in its statement haven’t quelled the controversy and in some cases made it worse. Trump spokeswoman Hope Hicks originally defended the omission to CNN saying, “we are an incredibly inclusive group and we took into account all of those who suffered. Chief of Staff Reince Priebus said he didn’t regret the wording.
The existence of the draft statement adds another dimension to the controversy around the White House’s own statement that was released on Friday and set off a furor because it excluded any mention of Jews. The White House has stood by the statement, defending it as an “inclusive” message that was not intended to marginalize Jewish victims of the Holocaust.
According to three people familiar with the process, the State Department’s Office of the Special Envoy on Holocaust Issues prepared its own statement for International Holocaust Remembrance Day that, like previous statements, commemorated Jewish victims.
The White House’s explanations for omitting Jews in its statement haven’t quelled the controversy and in some cases made it worse. Trump spokeswoman Hope Hicks originally defended the omission to CNN saying, “we are an incredibly inclusive group and we took into account all of those who suffered. Chief of Staff Reince Priebus said he didn’t regret the wording.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/white-house-holocaust-jews-234572
Bannon vet:
Citat:
The Washington Post reported Friday on a 2007 proposal for a documentary that was never made called “The Islamic States of America.” It would be comprised of interviews of people who, like Bannon, believe that the threat posed to the West is broader than Islamist extremist terrorists, embracing an array of Muslim advocacy groups. It describes as “enablers among us” – albeit with the “best intentions” — major media outlets, the CIA and FBI, civil liberties groups, “universities and the left” and the “American Jewish Community.”
It also describes “front groups and disingenuous Muslim Americans who preach reconciliation and dialogue in the open but, behind the scenes, advocate hatred and contempt for the West.”
Among these named by Bannon as “cultural jihadists” are the Islamic Society of North America, a group that had associations with the Muslim Brotherhood at its founding in the 1960s, but in recent years has worked closely with Jewish groups, including in combating anti-Semitism and raising Holocaust awareness among Muslims.
It also describes “front groups and disingenuous Muslim Americans who preach reconciliation and dialogue in the open but, behind the scenes, advocate hatred and contempt for the West.”
Among these named by Bannon as “cultural jihadists” are the Islamic Society of North America, a group that had associations with the Muslim Brotherhood at its founding in the 1960s, but in recent years has worked closely with Jewish groups, including in combating anti-Semitism and raising Holocaust awareness among Muslims.
http://forward.com/news/breaking-news/362181/stephen-bannon-described-jews-as-enablers-of-jihad-in-old-film-treatment/
Påfallande självkritiskt identifieras stora delar av den mediala strategin mot Trump baserat på hopkokta föreställningar att administrationen skulle vara "paranoid". Ett klassiskt scenario där man ljugit så mycket (och letts i vanföreställningar) att man låtit sig övertygats om sin egen riktighet och låtit det varit en drivkraft i rapporteringen. Administrationen har inte alls varit paranoida utan snarare svalt betet och lett media i den riktningen för att skapa överreaktioner och rubriker. Under tiden som medierna (av de som dristat sig till självkritik) omgrupperar väljer Vita Huset att lägga om strategin tillfälligt för att - i deras svagaste stund - avkräva dom ett påstående - inte för deras egen skull (dom blir ju bara dumförklarade) utan för att stärka legitimiteten och för det amerikanska folkets skull.
http://europe.newsweek.com/donald-trump-versus-media-548562?rm=eu
Trump kommer bli bästa presidenten sedan JFK minst.
__________________
Senast redigerad av NS_14 2017-02-08 kl. 04:54.
Senast redigerad av NS_14 2017-02-08 kl. 04:54.
