Citat:
Och så finns den här som jag tycker alla ska ta del av:Theodore A. Postol "rapport" om senaste kemgasattacken i Khan Sheikoun visade sig vara ett bristfällig då författaren, alltså Postol. hade blandat ihop olika tidpunkter och misstolkat Frankrikes underättelsetjänstrapport. Det är något som Postol fick dra tillbaka.
Vad gäller regimens användning av kemvapen finns rapporter både från FN, HRW och Amnesty samt ett oerhört stort antal vittnesuppgifter som inte går att uppdikta även om man försökte. Det är enkel vittnespsykologi.
Vad gäller regimens användning av kemvapen finns rapporter både från FN, HRW och Amnesty samt ett oerhört stort antal vittnesuppgifter som inte går att uppdikta även om man försökte. Det är enkel vittnespsykologi.
https://www.welt.de/politik/ausland/article165905578/Trump-s-Red-Line.html (måsteläsning).
Och här vi ett framtidsscenario (efter attacken mot Syrien i april):
Prepare for Impact – This is the Beginning of the End for U.S. Empire
Citat:
/.../The purpose of today’s post is not to discuss what happened last night. All of you have read the news by now. My intent today is to explain what I think this means for the years ahead. I believe last night’s strike represents the beginning of the end for U.S. empire. Although the U.S. has been declining domestically for this entire century, America has still been calling all the shots on the international front. This makes sense in late-stage empire, as the focus of the fat and happy “elite” becomes singularly obsessed with domination and power, while the situation back home festers and rots.
https://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2017/04/07/prepare-for-impact-this-is-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-u-s-empire/
Och här är Seymour M. Hersh expose om den tidigare attacken 2013:
Whose sarin?
Citat:
Barack Obama did not tell the whole story this autumn when he tried to make the case that Bashar al-Assad was responsible for the chemical weapons attack near Damascus on 21 August. In some instances, he omitted important intelligence, and in others he presented assumptions as facts. Most significant, he failed to acknowledge something known to the US intelligence community: that the Syrian army is not the only party in the country’s civil war with access to sarin, the nerve agent that a UN study concluded – without assessing responsibility – had been used in the rocket attack. In the months before the attack, the American intelligence agencies produced a series of highly classified reports, culminating in a formal Operations Order – a planning document that precedes a ground invasion – citing evidence that the al-Nusra Front, a jihadi group affiliated with al-Qaida, had mastered the mechanics of creating sarin and was capable of manufacturing it in quantity. When the attack occurred al-Nusra should have been a suspect, but the administration cherry-picked intelligence to justify a strike against Assad.
https://www.lrb.co.uk/v35/n24/seymour-m-hersh/whose-sarin
__________________
Senast redigerad av arbetet 2017-06-27 kl. 15:39.
Senast redigerad av arbetet 2017-06-27 kl. 15:39.
