Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Lucas49
Tydligen skall det ändå hållas val i det ockuperade Östra Ukraina. Undrar vad ryssen vinner på att stödja, uppmuntra och faktiskt tvinga att val hålls. Val som ju är illegitima i all sin olaglighet och det redan innan dom hållits.
Så Putin borde studera nog Minskavtalen bättre och inse hur han än mer skämmer ut Ryssland inför omvärlden genom att ständigt spotta på det.
Eftersom du fortsätter att hävda "ockuperade östra Ukraina" är det inte mer än rymligt att du redogör för
vilka ryska myndigheter finns etablerade där.
Vänligen
dokumentära att Putin tvingar republikerna att hålla val, som du hävdar.
En axplock från en artikel, som gång efter annan
understryker "val" i republikerna
Citat:
The European duo had already pried an important concession out of the Russian president in Moscow during the week prior to Minsk:
The elections in the separatist areas will only be held within those areas behind last September's demarcation line.
The border between Russia and the separatist-held regions in eastern Ukraine will be observed neither by the Ukrainians nor by international forces.
This issue will only be revisited after the elections, if at all.
The world must hope that
free elections are held in the separatist areas and that the elected politicians negotiate a fair autonomy agreement with Kiev, one that re-establishes Ukraine's unity.
http://www.spiegel.de/international/...a-1018326.html
Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Lucas49
Minsk-avtalen föreskriver ju faktiskt att lokala val ska hållas inom ramen för den ukrainska lagstiftningen.
Du glömmer väl bort viktiga delar av MINSK2 avtalet som
illegala banditregimen i KIEV struntat fullständigt i att implementera efter knappt FYRA år. Att i strid med MINSK2 avtalet, VR
ensidigt passerad resolutionen (utan någon diskussion med republikerna):
Citat:
This means that Kiev also violated Minsk-2’s fifth point or article, which reads: “Immediately, and not later than 30 days from the date of signing of this document, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine is to adopt a resolution with the specification of the territory covered by the special regime provided for in the Law of Ukraine ‘On the temporary order of local government in certain areas of the Donetsk and the Lugansk regions,’ (such territory) to be based on the line set out in the Minsk Memorandum of September 19, 2014.” The stipulation that Kiev consult—i.e. negotiate—in dialogue with Donbass representatives on the law ‘On the temporary order of local government, etc. is reiterated in Minsk-2’s article 12. Instead of dialogue on the temporary local government law, on 17 March 2015 the Verkhovna Rada passed unilaterally a corresponding resolution, having failed to consult with the Donbass rebels’ representatives in a “dialogue,” as stipulated in the Minsk agreement.
https://gordonhahn.com/2016/02/19/wh...ev-or-donbass/
Det är inte bättre med artikel 11, MINSK2:
Citat:
Article 11 of Minsk-2 requires Kiev to adopt a new constitution “with entry into force by the end of 2015 of a new constitution, which shall incorporate decentralization as a key element (taking into account the characteristics of certain areas of the Donetsk and the Lugansk regions, to be agreed upon with the representatives of these areas), as well as, before the end of 2015, adoption of permanent legislation with respect to the special status of certain areas of the Donetsk and the Lugansk regions in accordance with the measures specified in the Note.”
Minsk-2’s ‘Note’ mandates that the new constitution and any corresponding laws for decentralization provide for: (1) “linguistic self-determination” (to allow Donbass and perhaps other regions to use minority languages such as Russian); (2) participation of local governments in appointing the heads of prosecutorial bodies and the courts in certain areas of Donbass (Donetsk and Lugansk); the possibility for the central executive authorities to conclude agreements with authorities in the Donbass on economic, social and cultural development in certain regions; the establishment of People’s Militia by order of local councils for maintaining public order in Donbass; and several other clauses. Neither a new constitution or a law on decentralization and the other issues listed in the Note have been adopted by Kiev.
Neither has Kiev lifted the blockade to the separatist Donbass regions, reopened Ukrainian banking in those regions, nor issued the across-the-board amnesty for the rebels required by the agreement.
Thus, from 17 March 2015 Kiev has been in violation of no less than seven articles and nine obligations it signed on to under the Minsk-2 accord..
https://gordonhahn.com/2016/02/19/wh...ev-or-donbass/
Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Lucas49
och enligt OSSE: s standarder och observation. Om inte så är dessa så kallade "val" ogiltiga enligt satta internationella utformade lagar och regler, precis lika olagliga val som det på Krim
Varför ljuger du? Det finns ingenting av vad du hävdar i Minsk2!
Snarare är det
illegala banditregimen som spottar på Minsk2 avtalet genom att s***a att implementera det.