2015-08-26, 23:44
  #1
Medlem
SnakePlissskens avatar
Nu har det gått nästan 12 timmar sedan en ensam galning sköt ihjäl två journalister efter att han hade fått en ingivelse av Jehova att hämnas kyrkoskjutningen i Charleston, och ändå har ingen gjort en tråd om detta.. Skämmes foliehattar, ni har latat ner er under sommaren.
Vi behöver knappast diskutera OM det var en false flag, det är en självklarhet att foliehattarna kommer anse det inom kort - det jag är nyfiken på är istället varför, hur och vilka som ni tror har riggat detta. Att det skulle röra sig om en f.d. anställd som flippade pga religiösa vanföreställningar och troliga psykiska problem kan vi ju lämna därhän...
Citera
2015-08-31, 19:10
  #2
Bannlyst
Tycker det är konstigt att detta fall inte har fått genom slag än. Det har alla ingredienser en foliehat vill tänkas ha.
Citera
2015-08-31, 20:28
  #3
Medlem
SnakePlissskens avatar
Du behöver inte vara orolig - nätet svämmar över av false flaganklagelser även om denna skjutning:

There’s a big buzz about the tweet of Chris Hurst, the VA news reporter’s fiance’, that is said to have a 6:34am timestamp, while the shooting video has a time of 6:45am. Many are saying it’s all a fake, a false flag, just the government trying to push for gun control, etc. And saying the woman’s father didn’t show “enough emotion”, being more intent on his urging for more gun laws.

This cannot be an error. Time Stamps cannot lie. They both lived and worked and were in the same time zone. I guess this is another FALSE FLAG. There are no timezone errors. Google the time of shootings and they will show it occured at 6:45 am. Even Google 6:45 am and tons of news reports stated that was the time.

http://m.snopes.com/virginia-journalist-false-flag/

Very Serious Problems with the WDBJ Shooting Story
http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-lib...y-2512144.html

Piggyback False Flag? Today's VA Shooter Blamed Charleston Shooting?
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...eston-Shooting

Osv osv..
Jag tror bara våra flashback falseflaggers blev lite ställda och inte ville skriva i "min" tråd eftersom de tycker jag är en idiot
Citera
2015-08-31, 23:14
  #4
Bannlyst
Detta är intressant
Edit #2: I actually just realised one more thing that I didn't pick up the first few times I watched the first person footage. And that is the fact that the cameraman isn't wearing headphones... At first I thought he was, but after closer inspection it turned out to be just sunglasses that he was wearing on his head.
As I said, I have worked as a sound man and it's an absolute necessity during these kind of productions for someone to check and keep an eye on the audio recording. Usually this is the sound man's job, obviously, but when one isn't present and the cameraman is working alone this becomes his task. With a camera like the one he is using the sound picked up from the microphone which is plugged into the camera, as you can see in the footage, gets recorded right onto the tape. But the gain of the microphone (i.e. the volume) still has to be checked and adjusted. If you don't, then there is, first of all, a chance that you're not recording any sound at all, but also that it's either too soft or too loud, etc.
Now the footage obviously has sound, so there's a chance that he checked his sound input and gained the interviewer's mic beforehand (I would assume he did), and then took off his headphones... But that is still a very uncommon thing to do. Because in that case you simply can't hear if, for instance, the recording suddenly started clipping, or if the mic maybe happened to pick up an airplane flying over or a car driving by causing the speach of either the interviewer or the interviewee to become unintelligible. Which, when found out later on, would simply render the interview either partially or completely useless - something that is absolutey unacceptable in that line of work and has to be prevented at all costs. In other words; a risk no half-decent cameraman would take.
It's actually a very common thing and the reason why they often have to do one or multiple retakes just to get the audio right. So for the cameraman not to wear headphones is not only very strange but also simply unprofessional and just one more reason for me to believe that this never was intented to be a serious television production.


Här är videon av båda är http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=3eb_1440675897
Jag hör inte ordet Bitch som Gärningsmannen ska ha sagt och det är oklart om man ser blod?
Citera

Skapa ett konto eller logga in för att kommentera

Du måste vara medlem för att kunna kommentera

Skapa ett konto

Det är enkelt att registrera ett nytt konto

Bli medlem

Logga in

Har du redan ett konto? Logga in här

Logga in