Kända revisionister: Germar Rudolf

Stuttgart, end of 1990.
Of course, the relationship with this gorgeous high school girl falls apart after only a few weeks, and so our student sits in this great institute for solid state research with a broken heart. He doesn’t want to go home to his empty room with its abyss of loneliness. Then he suddenly has the idea:

"Hey, here I have all the resources I need to do the research on this gas chamber expert report as outlined in my letter: library, online databases, and even secretarial assistance! Heart, what do you want more? And I have plenty of time too, and a good reason to focus on something that really distracts me. What a providence! Well, very often woman are the driving engines behind great discoveries and inventions, so let’s do some really relevant research here!"

Thus, he spends ten hours daily with his PhD thesis and some four to six additional hours at night in order to figure out the chemistry of hydrogen cyanide in building materials in all details. Life makes sense after all!

Change of Scene
Four months long he does not achieve a lot, neither for his PhD, nor with his occasional private research. All he tries to find is some scientific source proving that Prussian Blue is really extremely long-term stable. Four month of online database and literature studies, and nothing. But then, one day, while sitting together with the librarian searching all sorts of databases with various keywords, something pops up:

"Wait a minute. Scroll back one line... It is a study on long-term stabilities of several inorganic pigments, one of them apparently Prussian Blue. That looks just perfect. Can you please order this article? How long will it take?"

"Well, we have to order it from England, so it might take a month or so."

Finally, in April 1991, the article arrives. It is a direct hit. A 21 year lasting study of Prussian Blue pigment exposed to harsh environmental conditions. Result: No noticeable decay.

Because of the workload of my doctoral supervisor Prof. von Schnering, however, I extended this period several times. I ended waiting five more months to February, 1993, until Prof. von Schnering began to proofread my dissertation.

"---A.R.: När det gäller också andra forskningar i gaskammar-frågor. Jag har hört talas om Krakow-rapporten. Ingenjörer i Krakow har gjort en rapport. Känner ni till om det?

G.R./Öv.: Ja, det finns alltså en undersökning till. Utöver Leuchter-rapporten finns det institutet i Krakow som heter Sen-institut. Frågan är den att polackerna påstår att de förstår inte hur blåsyragas kan uppstå, det heter alltså järnblå, en kemisk förbindning som sitter kvar i murverket 10, 20, 50 år efteråt. Och polackerna påstår att de begriper inte det funktionssättet.

Men Germar har påvisat i facklitteraturen. Det finns flera ställen, alltså olika böcker, att cyanidföreningar binder den där järnblåfärgen. Alltså han har inte undersökt det själv men det finns många ställen i litteraturen som påvisar det.

Och polackerna säger att eftersom vi inte förstår processen hur denna blåa färgen tillkommer, hur den uppstår. Vi förstår inte det. Alltså det är en kemisk process som är beskriven. Men polackerna säger att vi förstår inte den processen. Därför använder vi en annan analysmetod som utesluter denna blåfärgsbildning.

Jag sa just det att det är dumt att komma med det påståendet, ska vi säga det är dumt att utesluta en analysmetod bara därför att de inte förstår den. Och då sa Germar att det är inte bara dumt det är bedrägligt. Alltså de gör någonting som de inte, de utesluter saker som de inte riktigt förstår. Men han har bevisat i analysen och med dessa litteraturexempel att det är så som han påstår i sin rapport.

Och polackerna som har gjort den här Krakow-rapporten påstår till och med, de citerar en litteraturhänvisning som Germar har i sin rapport, och där är hela processen beskriven. Så de kan inte säga att de inte känner till det, eftersom Germar hänvisar i litteraturen till just dessa existerande metoder. Och de bryr sig inte om det.

Polackerna har helt enkelt använt en metod som passar dem i sitt koncept. Men det konceptet passar inte in, det är lögn helt enkelt. Därför att med den analysmetoden som de tillämpar kan man inte påvisa det som verkligen har hänt. Det alltså som Germar har analyserat, det bevisar vad som har hänt. Det bevisar den kemiska funktionen. Och polackerna har använt en analysmetod som utesluter dessa slutsatser. Och i och med det är det ju bedrägligt.---"

Under the reign of Louis XV, Voltaire became a candidate for membership in the French Academy. Noted philosopher Will Durant said that “to achieve this quite superfluous distinction he called himself a good Catholic, complimented some very powerful Jesuits, [and] lied inexhaustibly...” (1961, p. 164). In 1765, he began what would consume the remainder of his life (and for which he would be most famous)—his attacks upon the Christian religion. One of Voltaire’s first documents on this theme was his Treatise on Toleration, which attacked the Catholic Church. Durant observed:
The Treatise on Toleration was followed up with a Niagara of pamphlets, histories, dialogues, letters, catechisms, diatribes, squibs, sermons, verses, tales, fables, commentaries and essays, under Voltaire’s own name and under a hundred pseudonyms—“the most astonishing pell-mell of propaganda ever put out by one man.” And so he was read; soon everybody, even the clergy, had his pamphlets; of some of them 300,000 copies were sold, though readers were far fewer than now; nothing like it had ever been seen in the history of literature... (1961, pp. 180-181).
His attacks were both frequent and vicious. He began with what today would be styled “higher criticism,” in which he brought into question the authenticity and reliability of the Bible. He then alleged chronological contradictions in the narratives of the Old Testament. He challenged as incorrect many of the messianic prophecies of the Old Testament, and he stoutly denied any such things as miracles and the efficacy of prayer. He once commented: “It took 12 men to originate the Christian religion, but it will take but one to eliminate it. Within fifty years from now the only Bible will be in museums” (as quoted in Key, 1982, p. 2).
http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/286

Einstein was attacked by some with anti-Jewish leanings. When a pamphlet was published entitled 100 Authors Against Einstein, Einstein retorted "If I were wrong, one would be enough."
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/biography/Einstein.html