2001-08-28, 23:13
  #853
Medlem
http://hem.passagen.se/aron/

Visst, det är viktigt att läsa båda sidor. Felet de flesta gör är att bara läsa den etablerade "sanningen". Våga öppna dina vyer och läsa båda sidorna!

http://www.den-svenske.com/revisionism
där hittar du saklig information och kan också via länkar hitta många seriösa revisionistiska sidor.
2001-08-28, 23:30
  #854
Medlem
http://hem.passagen.se/aron/

En 'överlevande' jude skrev efter krigsslutet en bok..'Utvald att ljuga' verkligen informativ och man drömmer sig in i lögnens värld som är en vardag för en jude.

Jag rekomenderar varmt den boken! kostar inte mindra än 666:- riksdaler.
2001-08-28, 23:36
  #855
Medlem
Hans Villius

"så MÅSTE de ju ha lekt med tanken att förintelsen aldrig har ägt rum och att det rör sig om en gigantisk bluff.. "

förintelsen i sig är ju inte knuten till ett specifikt antal döda. den står ju mer för den utrensning som skedde. att det inte var en bluff finns det ju trots allt bevis för.
jag tror dessutom inte att våra prominenta historiker ändrat sin uppfattning särskilt mycket avseende förintelsen.

vad tycker du själv om siffran 1 milj. (döda i auschwitz) bör den revideras eller är det bra så?


2001-08-29, 00:01
  #856
Medlem
Raul Wallenbergs rapporter m.m

"Dom fick ett ultimatum, att lämna tyskland och återgå där dom hörde hemme"

och var hörde dom hemma? hitler intog alltså polen för att tala om för de polska judarna judarna att de inte hörde hemma där, vilket han då gjorde? österrikare som han var.

"Men att man skulle ha gasat ihjäl flera miljoner är rent utav absurt, knappast"

varför? låg det inte för nazisterna att genomföra ett sådant rasmord med tanke på deras människoälskande ideologi. att avrätta mentalsjuka talar ju för detta.

"Mein Kampf beskriver ochså väldigt detaljerat hur judar är, vilket verkligen stämmer."

hur kommer det sig att du kan avgöra detta. är du uppväxt i en judisk familj?

det enda man kan kalla dig är ignorant. du bemöter fakta och välgrundade inlägg med det du lärt dig på dina nazi-kurser och läst på kompisarnas hemsidor. utöver det finns ingenting!
2001-08-29, 01:15
  #857
äldre konto (old)
Ej medlem
Radio Islam

Detta är vad Ahmed Rami skriver om revisionismen i sin hemsida på:
www.abbc.com
- Läs och dra din egen slutsats:


"Historieforskning är en vetenskap. Åtminstone borde det vara så, även om denna gren får nöja sig
med lägre status än kemin och fysiken. Det finns t.ex inget Nobelpris i historia. Men de Nobelpris som
finns markerar inte bara vilka vetenskapsgrenar som är de förnämsta. Genom valet av pristagare
framhävs det år efter år att de mest förtjänta forskarna inte är de som försvarar gamla "sanningar" mot
nya upptäckter och nya teorier. Det är tvärtom de forskare som har lyckats revidera vår uppfattning om
vissa förhållanden som anses ha gjort mänskligheten den största nyttan.

Även historikerna sysslar med att få fram nya rön och infallsvinklar, med andra ord att revidera vår
föreställning om historiska förlopp. Det är oftast svårt att snabbt avgöra om en ny historisk teori är bättre
än den gamla, det brukar klarna först efter en period av kritik och diskussion (precis så var det också
med relativitetsteorin). När det gäller historiska fakta är dessa ofta fullt begripliga även för lekmän som
därför själva kan ta ställning till olika teorier.

Genom TV har vi fått veta att den brittiske historikern David Irving har lagt fram nya uppgifter
beträffande koncentrationslägret Auschwitz. Men vad han fått fram och hur han fått fram det får vi inte
veta just något om. Vår TV är en lika mäktig opinionsbildare som Hitler var för tyskarna. Och denna
statliga TV låter oss veta i stort sett bara att Irving är "revisionist", vilket påstås vara detsamma som
historieförfalskare. Detta är inte stort bättre än att tyskarna på sin tid fick veta att Einstein var en judisk
vetenskapsman, något som påstods vara liktydigt med charlatan. Båda påståendena är naturligtvis helt
orimliga. Alla historiker är ju "revisionister" mer eller mindre. Vanligare är att en historiker låter sina
förutfattade åsikter påverka valet av källor så att objektiviteten går förlorad. Därför behöver all historisk
forskning underkastas kritisk granskning, och sådan granskning kan i många fall också redovisas i
massmedia.

David Irving och Robert Faurisson har reviderat många historiska föreställningar i sina böcker - alltid
med omsorgsfull redovisning av källorna. Det borde inte vara svårt att hitta felen i hans framställning.
Att bara utan vidare påstå att han saknar all grund för sina påståenden är ett hån mot tittarnas intelligens.
Det är också kränkande för Irving, som väl knappast skulle sätta sitt anseende som historiker på spel
genom att framföra påståenden utan åtminstone någon grund.

Det förefaller också helt misslyckat att behandla revisionisternas forskning i samma program som visar
upp nynazister och skinheads. Att forska efter fakta och att skrika slagord på gatan är faktiskt två helt
olika saker. De felaktigheter som finns i Irvings skrifter, liksom i Faurissons, Leuchters och Rassiniers,
skall påvisas genom saklig kritik. Att Irving blivit anhållen av tysk polis, att Faurisson dömts till böter,
att Nelson Mandela dömts till fängelse, att Rami dömdes till fängelsestraff bevisar ju inte att de haft fel i
sak. Emile Zola blev dömd till fängelse för vad han skrivit, men han hade ändå rätt i sak. Vem som
betalade Leuchters utredning, och Rassiniers eventuella tro på marxismen är också ovidkommande för
frågan om de haft rätt eller fel i sina slutsatser och påståenden.

En känd historiker har alltså framfört nya rön och nya slutsatser rörande vad som hände i Auschwitz.
Med största sannolikhet finns det andra rön som talar mot hans slutsatser och kanske kan även annan
kritik riktas mot hans resonemang. Svenska massmedia borde se det som en angelägen uppgift att
upplysa allmänheten om såväl Irvings framställning av händelserna som den sakliga kritik som har riktats
mot den. Säkert kan också svenska historiker biträda på den sistnämnda punkten. Som tittare och läsare
kan man inte vara tillfreds med att påstådda forskningsresultat rörande en så viktig del av andra
världskrigets historia avfärdas som vore det skanderade slagord."
Ahmed Rami
2001-08-29, 01:55
  #858
äldre konto (old)
Ej medlem
Radio Islam

23-6-2000: Svenska Judinnan" skrev: "Hoppas Rami åkt hem!". För att - nämligen - han är, i Sverige, den enda som har öppet vågat säga hela sanningen om den judiska intellektuella terrorismen! Frågan är: varför är judarna så rädda för sanningen? Jag har just besökt Radio Islam´s hemsida. Den är verkligen mycket intressant. För mig utgör Ahmed Ramis kamp
EN PRINCIPFRÅGA OM YTTRANDEFRIHET och demokrati.
Följande texte är från Ramis hemsida på
www.radioislam.net

"Med list och alla andra medel försöker Israel - och Israels agenter - ständigt att vända bort uppmärksamheten från den judiska ockupationen i Palestina och från den illegitima dominans och politiska ockupationen, som den judiska makten utövar över de västerländska staterna.
En grupp militanta sionister vid Stockholms universitet har sålunda i en av de judiska organisationerna i Sverige beställd och finansierad opinionsundersökning "avslöjat", att 34 % av högstadieeleverna i svenska skolor "betvivlar" att "Förintelsen" av judarna verkligen förekommit.
Resultatet av undersökningen, som det gjorts stort nummer av i de judekontrollerade media, vållade panik bland de styrande. Riksdagen enades omgående om ett krav på åtgärder från regeringens sida, och statsminister Göran Persson uttryckte i ett känslomättat anförande sin indignation och oro inför det faktum, att endast 66 % av de svenska högstadieleverna tror på "Förintelsen".
Eftersom ett av de viktigare målen för undervisningsväsendet och massmedia är att få folk att tro på den påstådda "Förintelsen" och uppnå det hundraprocentiga antal troende, som judemakten kräver, har Göran Persson lovat att skyndsamt vidtaga konkreta åtgärder för att intensifiera hjärntvättningen av högstadieeleverna och medborgarna i allmänhet och för att täppa till munnen på alla dem som utsår tvivel på tron på "Förintelsen".
Den svenske statsministern har vidare lovat att efter sin hemkomst till Sverige, efter sommaren, personligen distribuera en videokassett om "Förintelsen" till alla elevernas föräldrar, så att dessa tar sitt ansvar för att uppfostra sina barn i sionistisk anda och tro.
Det borde inte vara någon hemlighet, att den svenske statsministern inte själv skiver sina tal De brukar skrivas av regeringens starke man, juden Leif Pagrotsky! "Göran Perssons anförande" inför riksdagen anslog tonen för media.
Dagen efter riksdagens sammanträde skrev den sionistiska tidningen Dagen, att "Föreningen Förintelsens överlevande" har beslutat stoppa Radio Islam och upprätta ett väldigt monument över "Förintelsen" framför synagogan i Stockholm. I en intervju i samma tidning förklarade föreningens ledare juden Jakob Ringart, att "det är en skandal att Ahmed Rami tillåts fortsätta förneka Förintelsen genom radiosändningar på svenska mark".
I en intervju samma dag i svensk radio förklarade en av ledarna för den judiska lobbyn, att resultatet av den nämnda undersökningen är frukten av årslånga sändningar från Radio Islam, och att "endast Ahmed Rami kan i dag vara glad över det".
Exakt en vecka efter statsministerns anförande beslöt Justitiekanslern i sin egenskap av högste statsåklagare att börja vidtaga "lagliga" åtgärder mot Radio Islams hemsida.
Samtidigt som detta beslut tillkännagavs i media, lät man förstå att Justitiekanslern beslutat hemligstämpla hela dossiern om denna "affär"!
Eftersom hela detta "affär" totalt mörklagts och Justitiekanslern vägrar att uttala sig, vände sig TV2:s Rapport till en karriärist juridikprofessor vid som på beställning menar att "Ahmed Rami kan befinnas skyldig till missaktning av det judiska folket, även om hans hemsida på Internet är baserad i Amerika. Ahmed Rami är svensk medborgare och skall dömas efter svensk lag".
Dagen efter beslutet om rättsliga åtgärder mot Radio Islams hemsida på Internet fick Ahmed Rami en räkning beträffande sändningarna från Radio Islam, som sänder 35 timmar i veckan. Enligt räkningen skall Radio Islam betala 6 000 kronor för sändningskostnaderna, efter en taxa på 65 kronor för en kvarts timme.
Radio Islam började sända den 3 mars 1987 och har aldrig tidigare (som alla andra närradio program) behövt betala någon avgift för själva sändaren (det finns en gemensam sändare för alla närradio-program på Stocholms city), utom för användningen av förbindelsen som förband dess studio med sändaren. Ordföranden i styrelsen för denna sändare är aktiv medlem i en sionistorganisation och undertecknaren av räkningen (också han sionist) är aktiv medlem i en homofilorganisation, som i sina publikationer ofta angripit Radio Islam.
Dessa politiska, juridiska och finansiella förföljelser av Radio Islam och dess hemsida på Internet är inte bara inriktade mot personen Ahmed Rami, som redan avtjänat sex månaders fängelse för att ha uttryckt sina åsikter, utan mot allas vår frihet. I går och idag är det Palestina, Tyskland, Schweiz... i dag är det Sverige och Rami. Vem står på tur i morgon?
Det är dags att övergå till konkreta handlingar av solidaritet utöver de geografiska, ideologiska, etniska och religiösa gränserna. Ondskans krafter agerar internationellt på den globala nivån i ett totalt krig för att lägga vår planet under judiskt herravälde.
Efter att ha visat sitt rätta ansikte i Palestina flyttar de hela tiden fram sina positioner i syfte att förvandla hela världen till ett enda stort ockuperat Palestina, det vill säga till ett enda stort fängelse, bevakat av en judisk ledarklick!
Vår civilisation kan endast överleva och blomstra i ett klimat av tankefrihet och respekt för de grundläggande mänskliga rättigheterna. Alla makter, religioner, ideologier och politiska system bör kunna hävda sig i en öppen och fri debatt och tillerkänna en opposition rätt att existera.
Den totalitära judendomen (med dess sionism) är i dag den enda ideologi, som systematiskt vill kriminalisera blotta existensen av en opposition och ropar för polisen så fort den blir emotsagd!
Innan man kan samexistera, måste man först existera. Den rätten förvägras dem som motsätter sig det judiska väldet. Denna judiska fanatism och obskurantism - direkt från antiken - som utövas idag (!) utgör ett farligt hot mot vår världsfreden.
Var och en av oss bör göra någonting konkret för att försvara friheten!"
Visa konkret solidaritet med Radio Islam!
2001-08-29, 11:01
  #859
Medlem
revision, javisst! ism...sällan!

Jocke, du verkar tro på någon sorts pastor Janson-variant (han som inte har några bestämda åsikter om någonting) av Förintelseläran. Kan man enligt dig ändra hur mycket som helst i sakuppgifter, med bibehållen trovärdighet?
Jag tror att anhängarna av den ortodoxa Förintelseläran som predikas av pastor Persson (kalott-Göran) skulle betrakta dig som revisionist, ja t.o.m. som nazist, vilket i deras ögon är samma sak.
Vi är väl alla överens om att det är en jävla skillnad om 2 miljoner eller 6 miljoner som dog, nämligen skillnaden för 4 miljoner människor, om de skulle ha dött eller inte. Men vadå inte ändra något i sakfrågan? Det har väl en oerhörd betydelse för trovärdigheten om man ändrar en faktauppgift så grovt!
Antag, att 2 av de balttyskar som Sverige internerade i lägret i Backamo skulle ha varit infektekterade av tyfus, och dött därav. För att undvika smittspridning, hade man skyndsamt sändt de båda tyskarna till Göteborg för kremering.
Antag vidare, att det skulle ha uppstått ett rykte efteråt att 6 tyskar gasats ihjäl i Backamo. Vidare, att ryktet lett till att lägerledinngen ställts inför rätta vid Uddevalla tingsrätt.
Antag även att, försvaret hade kunnat visa att endast 2 tyskar saknades, och att den föregivna gasningsmetoden var tekniskt omöjlig. Skulle då åklagarsidan kunna ändra sig till att det var 2 dödade, och att dessa slagits i hjäl med spikklubba, och med trovärdighet kunna driva målet vidare?
2001-08-29, 13:23
  #860
Medlem
Raul Wallenbergs rapporter m.m

Det är tydligt att "Julius Streicher" fått för sig judar är människor olika alla andra.

Hur han nu fått dessa konstiga idéer?!?

Och det kan ju i viss utsträckning ha varit möjligt för kanske 75-100 år sedan, men inte numera.

Den judiska börden är vanligen också ordentligt uttunnad genom giftermål över religionsgränserna, i västerlandet f.n. c:a 50 %.

Flertalet är f.ö. inte mer religiöst aktiva än våra (f.d.) statskyrkotroende.

Så var det f.ö. i stor utsträckning redan i Tyskland när Hitler kom till makten. Och där de flesta judar hade högst vanliga yrken, även om det fanns en överrepresentation av läkare, advokater, tjänstemän, affärsinnehavare av olika slag, journalister m.m.

Och då nästan alla också hade bott i Tyskland sedan generationer tillbaka och helt naturligt betraktade det som sitt hemland, var det för dem obegripligt att de skulle diskrimineras, fördrivas och som det sedan blev, att dödas.

Men "Julius Streicher" kan tydligen förklara varför...


2001-08-29, 14:28
  #861
Medlem
Hans Villius

"förintelsen i sig är ju inte knuten till ett specifikt antal döda."

Nää.. just det. Man undrar bara varför 6 milj. råkar vara den mest reklamerade siffra som existerat.. Du säger att förintelsen inte är knuten till ett specifikt antal döda, därmed antyder du ju själv på sätt och vis att det inte spelade roll om det överhuvudtaget skedde någon utrotning, den heliga Förintelsen (R) får inte rubbas även om antalet utrotade är 0. SJÄLVKLART spelar alla mytomspunna miljoner hit och dit en VÄSENTLIG roll. Om du inte inser det, så finner jag faktiskt ingen mening med diskutera vidare med dig.

"Att det inte var en bluff finns det ju trots allt bevis för."

Jaha, då säger du alltså med andra ord att förintelsen är bevisad.. Varsågod, nämn ETT fysiskt bevis som bevisar förintelsen och som skulle godtas i en demokratisk grundad rättegång som bygger på rättstatens principer. Du behöver inte ge mig 10, 20 eller 30 bevis för detta massmord i miljonklassen, utan bara ETT. ETT enda fysiskt bevis, är det verkligen för mycket begärt för ett påstått massmord på runt 12 milj människor?

"vad tycker du själv om siffran 1 milj. (döda i auschwitz) bör den revideras eller är det bra så?"

Det framgår tydligt vad jag tycker om den siffran om du bemödar dig att läsa mitt föregående inlägg..





2001-08-29, 15:15
  #862
Did Germans kill Jews?

Did Germans kill Jews?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What happened? World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean. Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one week's food supply -- and after that, starvation. At that time, the French army had mutinied. They had lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was defecting, they were picking up their toys and going home, they didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed.

Not a shot had been fired on German soil. Not one enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, Germany was offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: "Let's call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started." England, in the summer of 1916 was consideringthat -- seriously. They had no choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and being totally defeated.

While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and -- I am going to be brief because it's a long story, but I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make -- they said: "Look here. You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally." The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; wewere powerful. They told England: "We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war." In other words, they made this deal: "We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey." Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It's absolutely absurd that

Great Britain, that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war. However, they did make that promise, in October of 1916. And shortly after that -- I don't know how many here remember it - - the United States, which was almost totally pro-German, entered the war as Britain's ally.

I say that the United States was almost totally pro-German because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews; and they, the Jews, were pro-German. They were pro-German because many of them had come from Germany, and also they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar. The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't want Russia to win this war. These German-Jew bankers, like Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: "As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!" But they poured money into Germany, they fought beside Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime.

Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, like a traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies' hands. They were no good. Shortly after that, Mr Wilson declared war on Germany.

The Zionists in London had sent cables to the United States, to Justice Brandeis, saying "Go to work on President Wilson. We're getting from England what we want. Now you go to work on President Wilson and get the United States into the war." That's how the United States got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we had no more right to be in it than we have to be on themoon tonight instead of in this room. There was absolutely no reason for World War I to be our war. We were railroaded into -- if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into -- that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. That is something that the people of the United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into World War I.

After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: "Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war." They didn't know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So they started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, which was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration.

The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. I don't think I could make it more emphatic than that.

That is where all the trouble started. The United States got in the war. The United States crushed Germany. You know what happened. When the war ended, and the Germans went to Paris for the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought to know. Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations who claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, said, "How about Palestine for us?" And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized, "Oh, so that was the game! That's why the United States came into the war." The Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered the terrific reparations that were slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and were determined to get it at any cost.

That brings us to another very interesting point. When the Germans realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany. You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times as important in industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this country. You had Mr. Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd's and the Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers -- the biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. The Germans felt: "Well, that was quite a sellout."

It was a sellout that might be compared to this hypothetical situation: Suppose the United States was at war with the Soviet Union. And we were winning. And we told the Soviet Union: "Well, let's quit. We offer you peace terms. Let's forget the whole thing." And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union. And throwing them into the war brought about our defeat. A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which man's imagination cannot encompass.

Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we had thought were loyal citizens working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it was through them that Red China was brought into the war against us. How would we feel, then, in the United States against Chinese? I don't think that one of themwould dare show his face on any street. There wouldn't be enough convenient lampposts to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel.

Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. They'd been so nice to them: from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here they had sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than the fact that they wanted Palestine as a so-called "Jewish commonwealth."

Now Nahum Sokolow, and all the great leaders and great names that you read about in connection with Zionism today, in 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922, and 1923 wrote in all their papers -- and thepress was filled with their statements -- that the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought about by Jewish intercession in bringing the United States into the war. The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn't that the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious feeling. There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of their religious belief. It was all political. It was economic. It was anything but religious. Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and said "Shema' Yisroel" or "Our Father." Nobody cared in Germany any more than they do in the United States. Now this feelingthat developed later in Germany was due to one thing: the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat.

And World War I had been started against Germany for no reason for which Germany was responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of being successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world trade. You must remember that Germany at the time of the French Revolution consisted of 300 small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth. Three hundred separate little political entities. And between that time, between the times of Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state. And within 50 years they became one of the world's great powers. Their navy was rivaling Great Britain's, they were doing business all over the world, they could undersell anybody, they could make better products. What happened as a result of that?

There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia to slap down Germany. There isn't one historian in the world who can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the map politically.

When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew whom Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political prisoners, who wrote back that he found them in very fine condition. They were in excellent shape, with everybody treated well. And they were filled with Communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews, because the Jews happened to comprise about 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time. And there were some priests there, and ministers, and labor leaders, and Masons, and others who had international affiliations.

Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists took over Bavaria for a few days. Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht and a group of other Jews took over the government for three days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war he fled to Holland because he thought the Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia and that he was going to meet the same fate as the Czar. So he fled to Holland for safety, for security. After the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, the Jews were still working, trying to get back into their former status, and the Germans fought them in every way they could without hurting a single hair on anyone's head.

They fought them the same way that, in this country, the Prohibitionists fought anyone who was interested in liquor. They didn't fight one another with pistols. Well, that's the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans, and there were only 460,000 Jews. About one half of one per cent of the population of Germany were Jews. And yet they controlled all the press, and they controlled most of the economy because they had come in with cheap money when the mark was devalued and bought up practically everything. The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact. They didn't want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that.

The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews. They, shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could. They shunned them. The same way that we would shun the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat.

After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every country in the world attended this meeting in July 1933. And they said to Germany: "You fire Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist or no matter what he was.You can't treat us that way. And we, the Jews of the world, are serving an ultimatum upon you. You can imagine what the Germans told them. So what did the Jews do?

In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world conference of Jews in Amsterdam, the conference broke up, and Mr. Samuel Untermyer, who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the whole conference, came to the United States and went from the steamer to the studios of the Columbia Broadcasting System and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he in effect said, "The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them. That will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business." And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to starve. There was just not enough food for more than one third of the population. Now in this declaration, which I have here, and which was printed in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that "this economic boycott is our means of self-defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the National Recovery Administration," which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless he followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, and which was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of that time. Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn't find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the words "made in Germany" on it. In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted if anyone came in and found a dish marked "made in Germany," they were picketed with signs saying "Hitler," "murderer," and so forth, something like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South. At a store belonging to the R. H. Macy chain, which was controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews, a woman found stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked "made in Germany." Well, they were cotton stockings and they may have been there 20 years, since I've been observing women's legs for many years and it's been a long time since I've seen any cotton stockings on them. I saw Macy's boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs saying "murderers," "Hitlerites," and so forth. Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there was nothing.

Naturally, the Germans said, "Who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and make our industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?" They naturally resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews. Why should a German go in and give his money to a storekeeper who was part of a boycott that was going to starve Germany into surrendering to the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be? Well, it was ridiculous.

The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn't until 1938, when a young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot a German official, that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and having street fights and so forth.

Now I don't like to use the word "anti-Semitism" because it's meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I'll have to use it. The only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they were responsible for World War I and for this world-wide boycott. Ultimately they were also responsible for World War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive.In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had decided that Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in between. And the Germans decided they were going to keep it Christian if possible. And they started to re-arm. In November 1933 the United States recognized the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized that "Our turn was going to come soon, unless we are strong." The same as we in this country are saying today, "Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong." Our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars for defense. Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over control of many other countries of the world.

For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War, from which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT. Our nuclear bombs had a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT, when they were first developed. Now, the nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.

What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished. Why might such a war take place? It will take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World War III. The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government. That is just as true as I am standing here. Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read it, and it is known all over the world. What are we going to do? The life you save may be your son's. Your boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you don't know it any more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe. Did you know it at that time? Not a person in the United States knew it. You weren't permitted to know it. Who knew it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other insiders knew it.

Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there. I was "confidential man" to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the finance committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson's brain the graduated income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and I heard them indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement. Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers on this hand. President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it came to determining what was going on as a newborn baby. That is how they got us into World War I, while we all slept. They sent our boys over there to be slaughtered. For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as their "commonwealth." They've fooled you so much that you don't know whether you're coming or going.

Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, "Gentlemen, any witness who you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony." I don't know what state you come from, but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness told one lie, disregard his testimony.

What are the facts about the Jews? (I call them Jews to you, because they are known as Jews. I don't call them Jews myself. I refer to them as so-called Jews, because I know what they are.) The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world's population of those people who call themselves Jews, were originally Khazars. They were a warlike tribe who lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe. They set up a large Khazar kingdom of 800,000 square miles. At the time, Russia did not exist, nor did many other European countries. The Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe -- so big and so powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars would len them 40,000 soldiers. That's how big and powerful they were.

They were phallic worshippers, which is filthy and I do not want to go into the details of that now. But that was their religion, as it was also the religion of many other pagans and barbarians elsewhere in the world. The Khazar king became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith -- either Christianity, Islam, or what is known today as Judaism, which is really Talmudism. By spinning a top, and calling out "eeny, meeny, miney, moe," he picked out so-called Judaism. And that became the state religion. He sent down to the Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up thousands of rabbis, and opened up synagogues and schools, and his people became what we call Jews. There wasn't one of them who had an ancestor who ever put a toe in the Holy Land. Not only in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of time. Not one of them! And yet they come to the Christians and ask us to support their armed insurrections in Palestine by saying, "You want to help repatriate God's Chosen People to their Promised Land, their ancestral home, don't you? It's your Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior. You now go to church on Sunday, and you kneel and you worship a Jew, and we're Jews." But they are pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the Irish were converted. It is as ridiculous to call them "people of the Holy Land," as it would be to call the 54 million Chinese Moslems "Arabs." Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., and since then 54 million Chinese have accepted Islam as their religious belief. Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, from Mecca and Mohammed's birthplace. Imagine if the 54 million Chinese decided to call themselves "Arabs." You would say they were lunatics. Anyone who believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be crazy. All they did was adopt as a religious faith a belief that had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia. The same as the Irish When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped them in the ocean and imported to the Holy Land a new crop of inhabitants. They hadn't become a different people. They were the same people, but they had accepted Christianity as a religious faith.

These Khazars, these pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns, were a Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe. Because their king took the Talmudic faith, they had no choice in the matter. Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain. So the Khazars became what we call today Jews. Now imagine how silly it was for the great Christian countries of the world to say, "We're going to use our power and prestige to repatriate God's Chosen People to their ancestral homeland, their Promised Land." Could there be a bigger lie than that? Because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the television, the book publishing business, and because they have the ministers in the pulpit and the politicians on the soapboxes talking the same language, it is not too surprising that you believe that lie. You'd believe black is white if you heard it often enough. You wouldn't call black black anymore -- you'd start to call black white. And nobody could blame you.

That is one of the great lies of history. It is the foundation of all the misery that has befallen the world. Do you know what Jews do on the Day of Atonement, that you think is so sacred to them? I was one of them. This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser. I'm here to give you facts. When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, you stand up for the very first prayer that you recite. It is the only prayer for which you stand. You repeat three times a short prayer called the Kol Nidre. In that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months shall be null and void. The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge. They shall have no force or effect. And further, the Talmud teaches that whenever you take an oath, vow, or pledge, you are to remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and you are exempted from fulfilling them. How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon their loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916. We are going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the same reason
2001-08-29, 17:48
  #863
Medlem
revision, javisst! ism...sällan!

Good point där..

Siffran 4 milj. döda i Auschwitz ändrades i all tysthet till drygt 1 milj. En nätt liten reducering med en sisådär 75% bara. Nu skyller man allt på den fd "Polsk-Sovjetiska" kommissionen, vilket knappast kan bli mer falskt! Exterministerna försvarar alla dessa plötsliga ändringar i statistiken, med att det överhuvudtaget är ointressant hur många som dog, eftersom det "bevisligen" fanns en förintelse ändo. Dock så kan man inte trolla fram något bevis, men behövs det egentligen när man kontrollerar världens medier och alltså skriver reglerna för vad som är en politisk korrekt historeskrivning och vad som tjänar till att "rentvå Hitler" m.m?? Massorna behöver inga bevis då så gott som alla ju "VET" att förintelsen har ägt rum (dvs den har ägt rum även om den inte har ägt rum). Precis på samma sätt överlevde häx-myterna för flera hundra år sedan, innnan det sunda förnuftet slutligen smulade sönder det som nästan ALLA visste; Att det fanns häxor!

2001-08-29, 17:52
  #864
Medlem
Did Germans kill Jews?

Intressant.. Men ganska värdelöst om du inte uppger källan. Vilken bok/artikel och vem skrev det?

Skapa ett konto eller logga in för att kommentera

Du måste vara medlem för att kunna kommentera

Skapa ett konto

Det är enkelt att registrera ett nytt konto

Bli medlem

Logga in

Har du redan ett konto? Logga in här

Logga in