Narrativet krackelerar. Engelsk tidningsartikel uppvisar kronologiska brister:
Charles Shoebridge
@ShoebridgeC
46 minför 46 minuter sedan
Charles Shoebridge Retweetade Charles Shoebridge
Citat:
This perhaps significant (pls read all four tweets, feel free to retweet)
1/4 Yesterday a story from ‘UK security sources’ that tried to implicate both Russia & Syria in #Skripal chem case was perfectly timed to coincide with reports of ‘Syria chem attack’
Citat:
2/4 The article was published at 0001 on 8th, so the source briefing was almost certainly before Syria ‘chem attack’, yet article timed to coincide. This may suggest the ‘UK security source’ knew of #Douma chem incident in advance. Yet if so, nothing done to reveal or prevent it.
Citat:
3/4 The 0001 publication time also suggests the source requested an embargo so article wouldn’t be published until 8th, after Syria ‘chem attack’ had happened. If published before, wouldn’t coincide with ‘chem attack’, and could have implicated source with prior attack knowledge.
Citat:
4/4 A claim of a Skripal Syria chem weapon connection just as an ‘Assad chem attack’ could be a coincidence, as could be the briefing being before the ‘attack’ happened. But see how the article date has now been altered, hiding the implication that briefing must have been before
Citat:
In summary: article time (now falsified to appear later) suggests 'UK security source' (often mi6) Syria chem briefing took place before #Douma 'chem attack'. May suggest prior knowledge of it and, if so, that 'UK security sources' didn't try to prevent it
https://twitter.com/ShoebridgeC/status/983422268264058880
Det var iofs något nytt för mig att man t.o.m. försöker knyta ihop Skripalincidenten med Douma så uppenbart. Är det verkligen någon därute som tror på detta?