Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
gavlip
Ministerposterna för militären och polisen i den nya upprorsregeringen är besatta av fascister
Är alla "fascister"? Inget förslag till försvarsministerposten tillkännagavs, ett namn till den posten ska föreslås av något slags kommitté bestående av veteraner från sovjetkriget i Afghanistan.
http://www.kyivpost.com/content/politics/on-kyivs-independence-square-tonight-arseniy-yatseniuk-nominated-as-prime-minister-to-lead-new-gover nment-337700.html
Som ledare för the National Security and Defense Council i interimregimen föreslås en viss Andrey Parubiy, som representerar Tymoshenkos parti:
http://rt.com/news/maidan-government-announce-protesters-915/
Citat:
The Maidan gathering wants Andrey Parubiy, 43, to head the country’s National Security and Defense Council. A deputy for Fatherland party, he actively participated both in the recent uprising and in Orange Revolution. Parubiy began his political career back in the late 80ties, when he headed a nationalist youth organization.
Arsem Avakov föreslås som inrikesminister, även han från Tymoshenkos sedan tidigare komprometterade kleptokratparti. Men det är klart, alla är väl fascister. Och judar.
En ny överåklagare tillsattes dock häromdan, en representant från Svoboda. Och parlamentet (uteslutande befolkat av fascistiska judar, får man anta) beslöt att försätta 23 politiska fångar på fri fot. Jag gillar det brott som de tre först nämnda dömdes för - att ha planerat att spränga en icke-existerande Leninstaty

:
http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/cases-of-the-23-political-prisoners-that-parliament-set-free-on-feb-24-337588.html
Citat:
From left, Volodymyr Shpara, Ihor Mosiychuk and Serhiy Bevza were convicted and sentenced to six years in prison – on top of the two years they have spent in pre-trial detention – for planning a terrorist act. Authorities accused them of trying to blow up a non-existent Vladimir Lenin statue, but went ahead with the prosecution against the men for allegedly plotting unconstitutional acts of terror. Parliament voted on Feb. 25 to set them free as political prisoners.
On Feb. 24, parliament passed a bill to free 23 political prisoners. Eight are members of far-right groups believed to have been persecuted for their political beliefs. Five were anti-drug trafficking activists, one a lawyer to a member of a traffic police watchdog, another is an artist, and four were put in prison for allegedly setting a courthouse on fire. Two others are a father and son who were convicted of killing a judge but whose supporters say were innocent and framed. Another political prisoner is a student who apparently stabbed three police officers in what activists say was a fabricated case. Another was convicted of shooting a police major despite eye witness reports to the contrary.
Intressant och initierad artikel om det ukrainska oligarkväldet:
http://www.investing.com/news/economy-news/how-ukraine's-oligarchs-profited-from-the-regime-269030
Citat:
A larger question is whether what is happening in Ukraine is the politics of pillaging. How the Ukrainian economy -- the 51st largest in the world with a $175 billion GDP (according to 2012 World Bank figures, two notches below Peru and just after the Czech Republic) -- with at least 15 billionaires, can be on the verge of bankruptcy?
According to Chatham House’s Lutsevych, “it is fair” to describe the Ukrainian crisis as a result of the politics of pillaging. “Yanukovych and the rich would use public office to build monopolies and benefit from them,” she said. “Corruption in the Ukraine skyrocketed and corporate raiding increased.”
According to Olena Zakharova, director of the foreign policy department at the International Centre for Policy Studies in Kiev, “The Ukrainian economy has been pillaged by the oligarchs during all the years after independence, and this process reached its highest point during Yanukovych’s presidency.” She added that “all the money flows were oriented to the ‘Family’ oligarchs, first of all Yanukovych’s son Oleksandr, young Family representative Serhiy Kurchenko, Yanukovych’s right-hand man Andriy Kliuyev, and others. The other oligarchs had to share their businesses and assets with the Family in order to survive and have the possibility to profit from the state budget, which has put the country on the edge of bankruptcy.”---
True to form, Ukrainian oligarchs stayed on the sidelines as the political crisis unfolded, keeping as low a profile as possible. That required a particular set of skills, as politics and big business are deeply intertwined in Ukraine -- to a much higher degree than in Russia, where magnates steer clear of politics, especially under Vladimir Putin’s reign.
Rinat Akhmetov, the richest Ukrainian, with an estimated net worth of $12.5 billion, controlled a bloc of 50 lawmakers of the then-ruling Party of Regions at the 442-seat Verkhovna Rada, or parliament, according to experts including Orysia Lutsevych, a Ukraine expert at Chatham House in London. Another 30 MPs were controlled by Dmytro Firtash, who made his fortune in the chemicals and natural gas trade.
Their influence was not restricted to parliament. According to Anders Aslund, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics and one of the foremost experts on Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, when now-deposed Yanukovych took office in February 2010, his first cabinet of ministers included representatives from nine different corporate groups.
Många nationalister och kommunister anser alltså förunderligt nog att denna Janukovitjregim i allians med ett genomruttet kommunistparti vore ett betydligt bättre alternativ än att försöka åstadkomma en politisk, social och ekonomisk nyordning där korruption och förskingring i den skalan förhoppningsvis kan omöjliggöras. Regimen var ju "demokratiskt vald", gudbevars. Och oligarkerna är väl smorda av Herren själv, antar jag