Citat:
Debunkat många gånger om...
Måste först påminna om:
–
Måste först påminna om:
– Hur vet man om en notorisk lögnare ljuger?Om dom s.k. "finska vetenskapsmännen"
– ???
– Läpparna rör sig!
Timothy Osborn, Professor, University of East Anglia, and Director of Research, Climatic Research Unit:För övrigt anser jag att GWPF, Heartland och deras svansar borde förbjudas att sprida lögner.
«The unpublished paper by Kauppinen & Malmi is deeply flawed and the claims that (1) CO2 has caused only 0.1 degC of warming and that (2) only 10% (0.01 degC) of this warming is from human activity are both unsupported claims.
The paper should not be relied upon.
Their claims are based on a chain of reasoning with multiple flaws:
(1) They claim that climate models cannot be relied upon but do not demonstrate this.
(2) They instead make a new climate model (despite this being in contradiction of (1)).
(3) Their new climate model is unvalidated. It is based upon datasets of cloud and humidity without any sources given and which are not up-to-date. They provide no assessment of the accuracy of the data used—these variables are very difficult to measure on a global basis over the time period used. No physical basis is given for their new climate model (e.g. no process is given for how higher relative humidity can make the globe cool).
(4) They fail to consider cause and effect. For example, they assume without any support that a decrease in relative humidity is natural. They give no reasons why it would have decreased. They fail to consider whether climate change could have caused relative humidity to change.
(5) They state without any support that most of the atmospheric CO2 increase is due to emissions from the oceans. They ignore anthropogenic CO2 emissions which are more than large enough to explain the full increase. They ignore observational evidence that shows that the oceans are net sinks of CO2 at present, not net sources.
(6) They dismiss the entire body of climate science—especially that there is a significant greenhouse effect—and instead cite their own work (unpublished or published in journals outside the field).»
https://climatefeedback.org/claimreview/non-peer-reviewed-manuscript-falsely-claims-natural-cloud-changes-can-explain-global-warming/
–
klimatforskning är inte som annan forskning där man diskuterar och utvecklar sina teorier, utan snarare handlar det om att försöka spåra upp oliktänkande och smutskasta dom och förminska personen och hans arbete.
Så har även skett för Jyri Kauppinen och Pekka Malmi
klimatgestapo hittade tydligen ingen koppling till oljeindustrin eller liknande, men om Heartland tar upp forskningen även om forskaren inte är medveten om det så är det i sig forskning i "fel" riktning och ska fördömas.
now I got answer from Research Funding Support at the University of Finland. They told me, that either Jyrki Kauppinen or Pekka Malmi does not work as a responsible leader to any research project that gets additional funding outside the university.
The person who answered me is not the one who is working for the Department of Physics and Astronomy, that person will come to work next Monday. If she has any additional information, we will let you know.
With best regards,
So they seem to be saying that there are no suspicious funding sources in play. But it’s not terribly clear. Next step is to email the authors themselves. Stay tuned!
Stay tuned ? Gestapo figuren Kevin Bleakley gav tydligen upp när det inte fanns någon koppling till oljeindustrin eller liknande.
https://www.adventuresofaclimatecriminal.com/blog/a-reply-from-the-university-of-turku
