Bevis för att min gud, det flygande spaghettimonstret, existerar.

Q: I don’t believe you or any of your so-called followers actually believe any of this.
A: Some Pastafarians honestly believe in the FSM, and some see it as satire. I would just make the point that satire is an honest, legitimate basis for religion. Satire relies on truth to be effective. If it’s a joke, it’s a joke where to understand the punchline you must be conscious of underlying truth.

Compare our religion to those that are built on lies. I am not talking necessarily about mainstream religions (which themselves are often full of mysticism and ad-hoc reasoning), but think of cults, or churches where the leaders are scamming their followers out of money. These are groups where the followers fully believe. Are these churches legitimate since they have many True Believers?

Or can we agree that religion is as much about community as any shared faith. By any rational metric, Pastafarians are as legimate a religious group as any. Arguably more so, since we’re honest and rational.

Ursprungligen postat av kunskap1
Kan din gud skapa en annan gud om du anser att han är allsmäktig?

Varför inte repetera logikens fundamentala lagar:
Identitetslagen: A = A
Motsägelselagen: ingenting kan vara både A och icke-A
Det uteslutna tredje: allting måste antingen vara eller icke vara.

Hur definieras DFSM sanna natur ENLIGT logikens fundamentala lagar?

Är hans sanna natur fysisk eller metafysisk?

Observera att jag INTE diskuterar med någon som följer sin magkänsla, utan jag följer med någon som följer logikens fundamentala lagar.