Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Faderlig
Läs din egen text en gång till.
"The text explicitly identifies the man in the down jacket as the first person they encountered after leaving David Bagares Gata and arriving at the stairs."
Du har nu fått AI att svara på frågan om LJ är den första de möter efter att ha lämnat dvbg.
Vilket alla är överens om att så är fallet.
Det är vad Knattarna brukar kalla ett fulklipp.
Texten lyder:
Based on the transcript, the answer is
no. It is not likely that they met anyone before the man at the top of the stairs.
The text explicitly identifies the man in the down jacket as the
first person they encountered after leaving David Bagares Gata and arriving at the stairs.
Låt oss dra åt tumskruvarna lite hårdare. Premium-versionen av ChatGPT. Samma PDF-fil som finns på palmemordsarkivet.se (den nästan omaskade versionen av konfrontationsförhöret
E15-2-B). Jag använder engelska för att minimera risken för översättningsfel.
Strängare prompt:
Ahmed and Yvonne walked west along David Bagares gata. At the top of the stairs — before descending the 89 steps to Tunnelgatan — they encountered a man rushing up. Did they encounter anyone between Johannesgatan, 60 meters to the east, and the top of the stairs?
Respons (fet och kursiv stil av ChatGPT):
No. According to Ahmed Zahir's statement,
they did not encounter anyone between Johannesgatan and the top of the stairs.
The questioning specifically establishes that they walked from David Bagares gata toward the stairs, and when asked whether they met anyone "up on the stairs or at the stair-top or in the stairs", Zahir identified the man who asked them a question as being
at the very beginning/top of the stairs ("Första på trappan, upp").
So, on his account:
From Johannesgatan to top/beginning of the stairs: no person encountered.
At the top/beginning of the stairs: they encountered the man who came toward them and asked whether they had seen someone running.
Further down the stairs: they continued without mentioning another encounter until later events at Tunnelgatan.
There is therefore
no indication in this testimony of anyone encountered in the roughly 60 m stretch between Johannesgatan and the stair-top.
Följdprompt:
To what extent can it be ruled out that Ahmed met someone between Johannesgatan and the top of the stairs?
Respons (fet och kursiv stil av ChatGPT):
If we focus specifically on
whether Ahmed met someone between Johannesgatan and the top of the stairs, rather than merely whether he saw someone, the testimony gives a stronger basis for ruling it out.
Ahmed's account is that the
first person they met on their route was the man on the stairs, who asked them whether they had seen someone running. When the interviewer later explicitly reviewed the route and asked whether they met anyone "up on the stairs or at the stair-top or in the stairs", Ahmed answered by locating this man as the
"first" person on the stairs.
Earlier, Ahmed had also described the encounter as occurring
on the stairs, and said that the man asked them about someone running.
How strongly does that rule it out?
I'd put it this way:
Quite strongly: Ahmed's narrative does not contain an intervening encounter between Johannesgatan and the stair-top.
But not conclusively: the interrogation does not contain a direct, unambiguous question such as
"Between Johannesgatan and the top of the stairs, did you meet anyone?" Nor does Ahmed explicitly say
"we met nobody between Johannesgatan and the stairs".
Most importantly: when asked to account for people encountered along the route, he identifies the man on the stairs as the first such person. That is fairly good evidence against an earlier encounter.
So, if the proposition is:
"Ahmed met someone between Johannesgatan and the top of the stairs."
the testimony makes that proposition
unlikely, but it does not logically exclude it.
The appropriate conclusion is
"not supported and substantially contradicted by Ahmed's account", rather than
"definitively ruled out".
