Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
onopono
Härifrån...
Tack, jo jag vet, jag brukar som sagt göra det.
Du gillar inte sånt?
Du har fortfarande inte nämnt en enda lögn från denne, än mindre presenterat underlag som visar att det faktiskt handlar om just en, lögn.
Varför har du inte det?
Det har jag. Och flera andra. Multipla gånger. Och vi har upprepat oss. Nu gör jag det igen:
GMC har konstaterat att Wakefield ljugit i åtta avsnitt. För er som inte har länken till beslutet kommer den här igen:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110809092833/http:/www.gmc-uk.org/Wakefield_SPM_and_SANCTION.pdf_32595267.pdf
Här utdrag ur beslutet där det framgår VAR och i vilka avseenden Wakefield ljugit:
Citat:
The Panel found that Dr Wakefield had a duty to disclose this information to the Legal Aid Board via Mr Barr. It was dishonest and misleading of him not to have done so. The Panel concluded that his intention to mislead the Legal Aid Board was sufficient on its own to amount to serious professional misconduct.
Citat:
The children described in the Lancet paper were admitted for research purposes under a programme of investigations for Project 172-96 and the purpose of the project was to investigate the postulated new syndrome following vaccination. In the paper, Dr Wakefield failed to state that this was the case and the Panel concluded that this was dishonest, in that his failure was intentional and that it was irresponsible. His conduct resulted in a misleading description of the patient population. This was a matter which was fundamental to the understanding of the study and the terms under which it was conducted.
Citat:
First, in a published letter in response to correspondents who had suggested that there had been biased selection of the Lancet children, Dr Wakefield stated that the children had been referred through the normal channels, a response which was dishonest and irresponsible. He provided an inaccurate statement which omitted relevant information when he knew that the description of the population in the study was being questioned by the scientific community.
Citat:
Second, at a meeting of the Medical Research Council, the Chair, Professor Sir John Pattison referred to the seriousness and importance of the implications of Dr Wakefield’s research and its major public health implications. At that meeting and on the issue of bias in generating the series of cases, Dr Wakefield stated that the children had come by “the standard route”, a response which was dishonest and irresponsible.
Citat:
The Panel made findings of transgressions in many aspects of Dr Wakefield’s research. It made findings of dishonesty in regard to his writing of a scientific paper that had major implications for public health, and with regard to his subsequent representations to a scientific body and to colleagues. He was dishonest in respect of the LAB funds secured for research as well as being misleading. Furthermore he was in breach of his duty to manage finances as well as to account for funds that he did not need to the donor of those funds. In causing blood samples to be taken from children at a birthday party, he callously disregarded the pain and distress young children might suffer and behaved in a way which brought the profession into disrepute.
Citat:
The Panel concluded that Dr Wakefield’s shortcomings and the aggravating factors in this case including in broad terms the wide-ranging transgressions relating to every aspect of his research; his disregard for the clinical interests of vulnerable patients; his failure to heed the warnings he received in relation to the potential conflicts of interest associated with his Legal Aid Board funding; his failure to disclose the patent; his dishonesty and the compounding of that dishonesty in relation to the drafting of the Lancet paper; and his subsequent representations about it, all played out against a background of research involving such major public health implications, could not be addressed by any conditions on his registration.
Du menar även fortsättningsvis att det inte finns "beviiiiiiis, det finns inga beviiiis, beviiiiiiisa att han ljög, viiiiiisa var han ljög, viiiiiiiiisa, viiiiiiiiiisa vaaaar, viiiiiiiiiiisa".
Herregud...
