Citat:
Til dere som er interesserte i den tyrkiske Feyyaz Özturk, jeg kontaktet ham på e-post i går for å spørre hva han tenker nå som «Italia-sporet» har kommet ut. I den sammenheng nevnte Özturk selv at planleggingen av sporet skjedde i Italia lenge før vi fikk vite om det. Nedenfor deler jeg dialogen mellom meg og ham:
(1) E-POST FRA MEG
Dear Mr. Öztürk,
I have been following the Lørenskog case closely, and I recently came across your statements regarding your involvement and the information you provided to the Norwegian police. Given the recent developments in the case, particularly the confirmation of an Italy-related lead, I find some of your earlier claims particularly interesting.
I would like to ask you a few questions regarding your knowledge of the case:
1. You mentioned Italy long before the police publicly acknowledged an Italian connection. How did you know about this?
2. You claim to have provided the police with names, travel routes, and financial details related to the case. Have any of your leads been followed up?
3. Why do you believe the Norwegian police refused to take your written statement?
4. You mentioned that Tom Hagen is being blackmailed by his collaborators. Do you have evidence of this, or is it based on insider knowledge?
5. Are you still in contact with anyone related to this case?
Additionally, since you previously shared your thoughts on Flashback, I wanted to ask if you would consider posting another update there. Now that the police have confirmed an Italy-related lead—something you mentioned long ago—it would be very interesting to hear if you have any additional insights on that part of the case.
(2) SVAR FRA OZTURK
Hello D. Khan;
I am a good part of this case
I know the whole incident but the Norwegian police, the most incompetent police organization in the world, committed a big crime against me.
They took my 17-year-old daughter as hostage so that I would not talk, confiscated her passport and put her in a camp, but I went with my friends and rescued her and brought her all the way to Portugal. I only wanted to help that poor woman but the Norwegian state made an agreement with Turkey and issued a red notice for me. That is why I am no longer involved in this issue. The corrupt Norwegian police Kripos did not allow me to sign the statement I gave.
Why??
Because if I signed, I would have appeared in court as a witness and this would have changed the course of the case.
I was offered 500,000 euros to keep quiet and I refused and the Kripos knows it.
I am no longer interested in this matter.
Take good care of yourself.
(3) FRA OZTURK
By the way..
I told Kripos that everything was planned in Italy and gave the details on Dec.2022 and they find the computer now
)
This story is totaly different and I know the details but Norwegian authorities don't want me to talk about it.
I am writing a book with a journalist and explain everything there.
Ciao Khan..
Noen tanker rundt denne fyren? For meg virker det som han vet en god del
(1) E-POST FRA MEG
Dear Mr. Öztürk,
I have been following the Lørenskog case closely, and I recently came across your statements regarding your involvement and the information you provided to the Norwegian police. Given the recent developments in the case, particularly the confirmation of an Italy-related lead, I find some of your earlier claims particularly interesting.
I would like to ask you a few questions regarding your knowledge of the case:
1. You mentioned Italy long before the police publicly acknowledged an Italian connection. How did you know about this?
2. You claim to have provided the police with names, travel routes, and financial details related to the case. Have any of your leads been followed up?
3. Why do you believe the Norwegian police refused to take your written statement?
4. You mentioned that Tom Hagen is being blackmailed by his collaborators. Do you have evidence of this, or is it based on insider knowledge?
5. Are you still in contact with anyone related to this case?
Additionally, since you previously shared your thoughts on Flashback, I wanted to ask if you would consider posting another update there. Now that the police have confirmed an Italy-related lead—something you mentioned long ago—it would be very interesting to hear if you have any additional insights on that part of the case.
(2) SVAR FRA OZTURK
Hello D. Khan;
I am a good part of this case
I know the whole incident but the Norwegian police, the most incompetent police organization in the world, committed a big crime against me.
They took my 17-year-old daughter as hostage so that I would not talk, confiscated her passport and put her in a camp, but I went with my friends and rescued her and brought her all the way to Portugal. I only wanted to help that poor woman but the Norwegian state made an agreement with Turkey and issued a red notice for me. That is why I am no longer involved in this issue. The corrupt Norwegian police Kripos did not allow me to sign the statement I gave.
Why??
Because if I signed, I would have appeared in court as a witness and this would have changed the course of the case.
I was offered 500,000 euros to keep quiet and I refused and the Kripos knows it.
I am no longer interested in this matter.
Take good care of yourself.
(3) FRA OZTURK
By the way..
I told Kripos that everything was planned in Italy and gave the details on Dec.2022 and they find the computer now
)This story is totaly different and I know the details but Norwegian authorities don't want me to talk about it.
I am writing a book with a journalist and explain everything there.
Ciao Khan..
Noen tanker rundt denne fyren? For meg virker det som han vet en god del
Apropo "vet en god del".
når proffe laver en bløff, har man "fallovers", dvs dersom plan A feiler, har man plan B, med fallover plan C etc, slik at man hele tiden kan flytte "plottet" rundt og dermed skape forvirring og ta et steg vekk fra en ubehagelig sannhet.
Tyrkeren fremstår som en historieforteller som skal selge inn en plan C eller D for den saks skyld og dra inn italienske mafiaen, som nok folk tenker når "italia sporet" kommer, låter som en god bok eller artig film, heller en realitetene og det er nok at AEH og hva en hendte, er en Norsk greie fremfor noe annet.
så finner man på alt mulig for å forvirre. TH møter eks gangster fra København og det gjøres slik at pressen ikke må gå glipp av denne litt spesielle karakteren, som nok følte seg brukt i et narrespill fremfor noe annet.
TH finner pistol på isen utenfor hjemmet og så er det sikkert flere momenter som drar saken i rettning av en skapt historie som kjører en slags påvirknings agenda, slik at folk hele tiden fores med noe å SE og FOKUSERE på, fremfor hva en der skjules.
Det er saken i seg selv, karakterene som draes frem og inn som krydrer saken som om den var skapt som et spennende tema folk skulle snakke om, men da innenfor de gitte rammer.
Derfor ser man enkelte fortviler når Wiborg draes inn, det saken mange helst vil skal dø stille ut, fordi den faktisk har mulig relevans til AEH sin skjebne.
Man må regne med at de som har en agenda også opptrer her og sier hysj npr man nevner Wiborg, noe som gjør det tvingende nødvendig og gå hardere på med nettopp den leaden der.