Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Spugge
Bifogar också en källa till:
https://www.gichd.org/fileadmin/uploads/gichd/Publications/Explosive_weapon_effects_web.pdf
Sida 93:
"Some munitions pose particular targeting concerns. A single Mk 82, for example,
contains 89 kg of high explosive. It creates a tremendously powerful blast,
making collateral damage mitigation measures a complex task in a populated
area. Owing to the powerful blast wave it produces, it can destroy reinforced
concrete structures within 16 m of the point of detonation, and will easily flatten
the houses and apartment buildings that civilians inhabit. Non-reinforced buildings
offer almost no protection from a direct hit from a Mk 82. This is clear from the
5 April 2003 case study from Al-Tuwaisi, Basra (E1), when an attempt was made
to kill a high-value individual in his house. The house was destroyed, but so were
the houses on either side, killing 17 people and injuring another 5."
Mk 82 har alltså halva vikten jämfört med den stritsspets som sitter in en Kh 101. Ser det mer ut som denna beskrivning med husen runt omkring förstöra, eller mer som de förstörda husen med en T62-mina ovan?
Bilder på sjukhuset.
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/kremlin-says-kyiv-childrens-hospital-was-hit-by-anti-missile-fire-not-by-russia-2024-07-09/
