__________________
Senast redigerad av nerdnerd 2024-04-29 kl. 19:31.
Senast redigerad av nerdnerd 2024-04-29 kl. 19:31.
Kollade lite på skoj med MS Copilot som är den AI som vi rekommenderas att använda på jobbet:
(Det är mina fetningar för att underlätta läsandet något, men i övrigt har jag inte rört det någonting.)
----
[Jag]:
What is wrong with moon landing sceptics?
Copilot:
Moon landing skepticism often stems from a variety of misconceptions and misunderstandings about the scientific and technical aspects of space travel. Here are some common points raised by skeptics and the explanations that debunk these claims:
Flag Waving: Skeptics argue that the American flag appears to wave in the vacuum of the moon, which should be impossible without an atmosphere. However, the flag did not need wind to move; it only moved when touched, and due to the lack of atmosphere, it took a long time to settle.
Shadow Directions: The claim that shadows cast by objects on the lunar surface point in different directions suggests multiple light sources, like in a TV studio. In reality, a low sun and the uneven lunar surface can distort shadow angles, and each object only casts one shadow.
Radiation Belts: Some believe that the Apollo astronauts would have been harmed by the Van Allen radiation belts. However, the astronauts passed through these belts quickly, receiving a dose of radiation equivalent to a medical X-ray, not enough to cause harm.
C on Moon Rock: A photograph from Apollo 16 shows a rock with a “C” on it, which skeptics say indicates a prop. This “C” is not present in the original negatives and is likely a hair or fiber that contaminated a reproduction.
Footprints on the Moon: Skeptics question how astronauts left footprints on the dry lunar surface. Moon dust particles are different from Earth’s sand; they can hold a compressed shape without moisture, similar to how powders like talcum powder behave on Earth.
No Exhaust Flame: The absence of a visible exhaust flame from the lunar module during takeoff led some to believe it was a model being pulled by a wire. The lunar lander’s propellant doesn’t produce a visible flame, unlike the Saturn V rocket’s kerosene and liquid oxygen combination.
These points, among others, have been thoroughly investigated and debunked by experts. The persistence of moon landing conspiracy theories can be attributed to a variety of psychological and social factors, including distrust in authorities, the appeal of secret knowledge, and the human tendency to favor sensational stories over mundane truths. It’s important to rely on credible sources and scientific consensus when evaluating such historical events.
---
Så vad tycker du nu om AI?
(Det är mina fetningar för att underlätta läsandet något, men i övrigt har jag inte rört det någonting.)
----
[Jag]:
What is wrong with moon landing sceptics?
Copilot:
Moon landing skepticism often stems from a variety of misconceptions and misunderstandings about the scientific and technical aspects of space travel. Here are some common points raised by skeptics and the explanations that debunk these claims:
Flag Waving: Skeptics argue that the American flag appears to wave in the vacuum of the moon, which should be impossible without an atmosphere. However, the flag did not need wind to move; it only moved when touched, and due to the lack of atmosphere, it took a long time to settle.
Shadow Directions: The claim that shadows cast by objects on the lunar surface point in different directions suggests multiple light sources, like in a TV studio. In reality, a low sun and the uneven lunar surface can distort shadow angles, and each object only casts one shadow.
Radiation Belts: Some believe that the Apollo astronauts would have been harmed by the Van Allen radiation belts. However, the astronauts passed through these belts quickly, receiving a dose of radiation equivalent to a medical X-ray, not enough to cause harm.
C on Moon Rock: A photograph from Apollo 16 shows a rock with a “C” on it, which skeptics say indicates a prop. This “C” is not present in the original negatives and is likely a hair or fiber that contaminated a reproduction.
Footprints on the Moon: Skeptics question how astronauts left footprints on the dry lunar surface. Moon dust particles are different from Earth’s sand; they can hold a compressed shape without moisture, similar to how powders like talcum powder behave on Earth.
No Exhaust Flame: The absence of a visible exhaust flame from the lunar module during takeoff led some to believe it was a model being pulled by a wire. The lunar lander’s propellant doesn’t produce a visible flame, unlike the Saturn V rocket’s kerosene and liquid oxygen combination.
These points, among others, have been thoroughly investigated and debunked by experts. The persistence of moon landing conspiracy theories can be attributed to a variety of psychological and social factors, including distrust in authorities, the appeal of secret knowledge, and the human tendency to favor sensational stories over mundane truths. It’s important to rely on credible sources and scientific consensus when evaluating such historical events.
---
Så vad tycker du nu om AI?
__________________
Senast redigerad av nerdnerd 2024-04-29 kl. 19:48.
Senast redigerad av nerdnerd 2024-04-29 kl. 19:48.
Citat:
LOL. Det är bara en mindre grupp "äldre" som fortfarande tror på månlandningsfantasierna. Plus då den stora NPC-majoriteten, men av tänkande människor är de troende i absolut minoritet.
Att ens överväga att de sjöng och hoppade runt under ett skarpt uppdrag är befängt. Vad som däremot är fullt rimligt är att de sjöng och hoppade runt under en simulering, när allt var på låtsas. Det är den självklara slutsatsen jag kan dra utifrån och angående dina klipp.
Att ens överväga att de sjöng och hoppade runt under ett skarpt uppdrag är befängt. Vad som däremot är fullt rimligt är att de sjöng och hoppade runt under en simulering, när allt var på låtsas. Det är den självklara slutsatsen jag kan dra utifrån och angående dina klipp.
Varför skulle man inte kunna sjunga på månen?
‼️Skapa ett konto eller logga in för att kommentera
Du måste vara medlem för att kunna kommentera