Brave är ingen webläsare att rekommendera från en som bryr sig om ens integritet, är noga med detta.
GNUzilla and IceCat som är approved från Richard Stallman bör ni dock ha i åtanke. Finns att läsa mer på länken nedan om den, bygger på firefox:
https://www.gnu.org/software/gnuzilla/
Ang DuckGo, kolla upp GnuNET?
https://www.gnunet.org/en/
Brave utvecklarna håller med på jävligt fula metoder sedan länge.
Citat:
Brave browser collecting donations on behalf of content creators
In December 2018, British YouTube content creator Tom Scott said that he had not received any donations collected on his behalf by Brave browser. In a tweet, he stated "So if you thought you'd donated to me through Brave, the money (or their pseudo-money [BAT]) will not reach me, and Brave's terms say that they may choose to just keep it for themselves. It looks like they're 'providing this service' for every creator on every platform. No opt-in, no consent."[91][92] In response, Brave amended the interface with a disclaimer for each creator who hasn't signed up with Brave and promised to consider adding "an opt-out option for creators who do not wish to receive donations" and "switching the default so users cannot tip or donate to unverified creators".[93] Critics stated that the system should be opt-in and not opt-out, that the disclaimer did not clearly state absence of any relation with the creators, and suggests that creator begun process of signing up with Brave.[citation needed] Two days after the complaint, Brave issued an update to "clearly indicate which publishers and creators have not yet joined Brave Rewards so users can better control how they donate and tip"[93] and in January 2020 another update to change the behavior of contributions and tips. They are now held in the browser and transferred if the creator signs up within 90 days; otherwise, they are returned to the user.[94][95] Tom Scott, the original complainant, tweeted in response: "These are good changes, and they fix the complaints I had!".[95]
