Citat:
"NS-grupperingar" som sponsras av judiska oligarker och leds av israeliska agenter och som i praktiken och de facto kämpar för judisk makt och homosexrörelsens framsteg.
"Ukraina" som egentligen aldrig har existerat som nation eller självständig entitet innan 1991 och alltid har styrts av vikingar(som skapade hela skiten av ett sammelsurium av slaver, finnar och balter), mongoler, polacker, ryssar, turkar m.fl, med en kort period av kossackstyre på 1600-talet med den judekrossande hjälten Bogdan i spetsen som enda undantag (kosacker som för övrigt hade katoliker, polacker och judar som främsta hatobjekt och fiende, eftersom det var de polska förtryckarna som tvingade folket i västra Ukraina att bli katoliker i deras egenpåhittade "grekisk-katolska" kyrka) är ju en clownverksamhet utan dess like. Trots en av världens bästa förutsättningar för jordbruk och en ganska omfattande industriell och teknologisk kapacitet är det fortfarande Europas fattigaste land. De fejk-katolska dårarna i västra änden av Ukraina (ca 1/10 av befolkningen) har med decenniers stöd från CIA och stor "grekisk-katolsk" diaspora och lobby i USA, Kanada m.fl.länder abetat för skapandetav dagens jude-fars till land. Efter CIA-kuppen och regimbytet 2014 så togs alla maktpositioner över av judar och till sist så tyckte de vita negrerna att det vore bra med en judisk TV-gycklare som president och pride-parader.
Godnatt. Ridå. Eller nåt.
Vi fåtaliga sansade människor med lite koll får väl mest vänta och se vad som händer nu. Mycket kan hända. Det är inte alls säkert att detta försvagar ZOG och gynnar europeiska folk på det sätt man skulle kunna tro.
"Ukraina" som egentligen aldrig har existerat som nation eller självständig entitet innan 1991 och alltid har styrts av vikingar(som skapade hela skiten av ett sammelsurium av slaver, finnar och balter), mongoler, polacker, ryssar, turkar m.fl, med en kort period av kossackstyre på 1600-talet med den judekrossande hjälten Bogdan i spetsen som enda undantag (kosacker som för övrigt hade katoliker, polacker och judar som främsta hatobjekt och fiende, eftersom det var de polska förtryckarna som tvingade folket i västra Ukraina att bli katoliker i deras egenpåhittade "grekisk-katolska" kyrka) är ju en clownverksamhet utan dess like. Trots en av världens bästa förutsättningar för jordbruk och en ganska omfattande industriell och teknologisk kapacitet är det fortfarande Europas fattigaste land. De fejk-katolska dårarna i västra änden av Ukraina (ca 1/10 av befolkningen) har med decenniers stöd från CIA och stor "grekisk-katolsk" diaspora och lobby i USA, Kanada m.fl.länder abetat för skapandetav dagens jude-fars till land. Efter CIA-kuppen och regimbytet 2014 så togs alla maktpositioner över av judar och till sist så tyckte de vita negrerna att det vore bra med en judisk TV-gycklare som president och pride-parader.
Godnatt. Ridå. Eller nåt.
Vi fåtaliga sansade människor med lite koll får väl mest vänta och se vad som händer nu. Mycket kan hända. Det är inte alls säkert att detta försvagar ZOG och gynnar europeiska folk på det sätt man skulle kunna tro.
Citat:
Det är en lite krånglig historia men i princip så är väl kontentan av det hela att dagens Ukraina, och dess gränser, i stort sett helt är ett resultat av godtyckliga gränsdragningar av bolsjeviker och kommunister då det begav sig samt vissa sovjetiska landvinningar under andra världskriget om jag minns det hela rätt.
Det är lite ironiskt att vissa nationalister är så fästa vid dessa gränsers helgd när man betänker vilka som drog upp dessa kan jag tycka...
Det är lite ironiskt att vissa nationalister är så fästa vid dessa gränsers helgd när man betänker vilka som drog upp dessa kan jag tycka...
Den amerikanske analytikern David Stockman ger sig på en historisk parallell och resonerar kring historiciteten gällande dagens "Ukraina", han verkar inte så imponerad...:
Citat:
Given these realities, why should Washington care about an intramural battle among contiguous peoples and territories that have been joined at the hip for most of the last 1300 years?
The implicit answer is because it’s the world’s self-appointed policeman and Spanker-in-Chief.
Beyond that, it’s apparently due to a putative aggrandizement syndrome. That is, Putin’s Russia may be puny in the economic and military scheme of things today, but once it is permitted to acquire a taste for conquest it is certain to grow into a Hitlerian monster.
Needless to say, the former reason is based on Washington’s institutionalized arrogance and has no place at all in realistic thinking about national security, while the latter is based on sheer ignorance about the actual history of Hitler’s conquests.
The truth is, there was nothing inexorable about it. Contrary to today’s nostrums, Nazi Germany wasn’t a self-feeding deus ex machina of conquest, nor was it a generic model of what happens when ruthless dictators are not braced with opposing force early on.
To the contrary, Hitler was a product of a specific, unique and unfortunate history that bears no resemblance to current circumstances on the Ukrainian/Russian line of conflict. In fact, Hitler’s original expansion was rooted in deep German grievances about its territorial, industrial and financial (i.e. onerous reparations) decapitation by the vengeful winners at Versailles.
Thus, the re-occupation of the Alsace-Lorain and the Ruhr, the annexation of the German speaking Sudetenland, the dispute over the Danzig Corridor in Poland – all involved the reclamation of former German territories, while the Anschluss with Austria was a voluntary marriage of German-speaking losers from the abomination of 1919.
So Hitler’s rise and initial territorial expansion had been preventable, not inexorable, because it was rooted in historic mistakes that took on a life of their own: Namely, the irridentism of an aggrieved German population that had been stripped of 15% of its historic territory and upwards of 50% of its coal and other industrial resources by the “peacemakers” at Versailles.
Stated differently, Hitler was the metastasized residue of history gone wrong, not the inexorable product of annexing, for instance, the overwhelmingly German speaking population of the Sudetenland. The latter had been extracted from Germany in 1919 and handed to the new state of Czechoslovakia, which, in turn, had been carved out of whole cloth by Wilson & Co.
The correct lesson from the 1930s, therefore, is more nearly the opposite of the deus ex machina aggrandizement syndrome peddled by Washington and Brussels. It was the West’s insistence on the creation and perpetuation of the artificial states of Poland and Czechoslovakia that gestated Hitler, not the mere fact of neighboring territories being conquered after the fact.
As it happened, Poland had disappeared from the maps of Europe in 1795 and had no reason to come back in the fulsome extent provided by the Versailles Treaty except for Wilson’s courting of the Polish vote in the industrial Midwest. Similarly, the mongrel state of Czechoslovakia with its linguistic, religious and ethnic concoction had no historical basis or reason for existence at all. Well, again, except for American electoral machinations, which constituted the raw politics underlying Wilson’s messianic determination to remake the map of the world so as to be “safe for democracy” in his own exalted opinion.
The fact is, Ukraine is the Poland and Czechoslovakia of the present time – an artificial state loaded with Russians and with no reason for existence in its present form and girth. Well, still again, other than Washington’s fanatical insistence that the happenstance map of administrative units which fell out of the Soviet Union’s collapse constitute sacred borders that must be preserved at all hazards.
To the contrary, what Putin wants, ironically, is the pre-communist status quo ante. That is, he wants Crimea, where Ukrainians constitute but a tiny minority and which had been Russian since 1783. And, more crucially, which hosts the greatest strategic military asset possessed by Russia thereafter – -the great Naval base at the headwaters of the Black Sea in Sevastopol.
Likewise, the Donbas and territories east of the Dnieper River and along the northern edge of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov have been Russian for upwards of 300 years. By all facts of pre-1922 history, these territories amounted to Novorossiya (“New Russia”) as shown in this map from 1897.
As it happened, they became “Ukrainian” only by writ of two of history’s greatest evil monsters – Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin – who placed them in the administrative unit of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic for reasons that have no historic validity whatsoever.
Yet a devastating war goes on there today – a war which is careening to the precipice of WWIII – because Washington encourages Kiev to insist on retention of “every inch” of a map put together by Lenin, Stalin and Khrushchev.
In fact, the latter did for the map of Ukraine what Wilson & Co. did to Germany after the Great War. That is to say, these long gone commie dictators extracted from Russian and Polish territories a combustible mongrel that begs to be partitioned and returned to the status quo ante, not defended to the last drop of Ukrainian blood and US/NATO treasure.
https://lrc-cdn.s3.amazonaws.com/assets/2022/03/new-russia.jpg
Needless to say, there is no Washington policy-maker familiar with the above map, nor Capitol Hill armchair warrior who has a clue. Most especially, by shrieking about “borders” being violated and the need for all out support to a heroic nation valiantly resisting the Russian ogre, the GOP’s bloodthirsty hawks and neocons have made it easy as pie for Biden and his national security minions to pivot to an all-out war footing against Russia, thereby distracting the American public from the abysmal failure of their domestic policies.
The implicit answer is because it’s the world’s self-appointed policeman and Spanker-in-Chief.
Beyond that, it’s apparently due to a putative aggrandizement syndrome. That is, Putin’s Russia may be puny in the economic and military scheme of things today, but once it is permitted to acquire a taste for conquest it is certain to grow into a Hitlerian monster.
Needless to say, the former reason is based on Washington’s institutionalized arrogance and has no place at all in realistic thinking about national security, while the latter is based on sheer ignorance about the actual history of Hitler’s conquests.
The truth is, there was nothing inexorable about it. Contrary to today’s nostrums, Nazi Germany wasn’t a self-feeding deus ex machina of conquest, nor was it a generic model of what happens when ruthless dictators are not braced with opposing force early on.
To the contrary, Hitler was a product of a specific, unique and unfortunate history that bears no resemblance to current circumstances on the Ukrainian/Russian line of conflict. In fact, Hitler’s original expansion was rooted in deep German grievances about its territorial, industrial and financial (i.e. onerous reparations) decapitation by the vengeful winners at Versailles.
Thus, the re-occupation of the Alsace-Lorain and the Ruhr, the annexation of the German speaking Sudetenland, the dispute over the Danzig Corridor in Poland – all involved the reclamation of former German territories, while the Anschluss with Austria was a voluntary marriage of German-speaking losers from the abomination of 1919.
So Hitler’s rise and initial territorial expansion had been preventable, not inexorable, because it was rooted in historic mistakes that took on a life of their own: Namely, the irridentism of an aggrieved German population that had been stripped of 15% of its historic territory and upwards of 50% of its coal and other industrial resources by the “peacemakers” at Versailles.
Stated differently, Hitler was the metastasized residue of history gone wrong, not the inexorable product of annexing, for instance, the overwhelmingly German speaking population of the Sudetenland. The latter had been extracted from Germany in 1919 and handed to the new state of Czechoslovakia, which, in turn, had been carved out of whole cloth by Wilson & Co.
The correct lesson from the 1930s, therefore, is more nearly the opposite of the deus ex machina aggrandizement syndrome peddled by Washington and Brussels. It was the West’s insistence on the creation and perpetuation of the artificial states of Poland and Czechoslovakia that gestated Hitler, not the mere fact of neighboring territories being conquered after the fact.
As it happened, Poland had disappeared from the maps of Europe in 1795 and had no reason to come back in the fulsome extent provided by the Versailles Treaty except for Wilson’s courting of the Polish vote in the industrial Midwest. Similarly, the mongrel state of Czechoslovakia with its linguistic, religious and ethnic concoction had no historical basis or reason for existence at all. Well, again, except for American electoral machinations, which constituted the raw politics underlying Wilson’s messianic determination to remake the map of the world so as to be “safe for democracy” in his own exalted opinion.
The fact is, Ukraine is the Poland and Czechoslovakia of the present time – an artificial state loaded with Russians and with no reason for existence in its present form and girth. Well, still again, other than Washington’s fanatical insistence that the happenstance map of administrative units which fell out of the Soviet Union’s collapse constitute sacred borders that must be preserved at all hazards.
To the contrary, what Putin wants, ironically, is the pre-communist status quo ante. That is, he wants Crimea, where Ukrainians constitute but a tiny minority and which had been Russian since 1783. And, more crucially, which hosts the greatest strategic military asset possessed by Russia thereafter – -the great Naval base at the headwaters of the Black Sea in Sevastopol.
Likewise, the Donbas and territories east of the Dnieper River and along the northern edge of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov have been Russian for upwards of 300 years. By all facts of pre-1922 history, these territories amounted to Novorossiya (“New Russia”) as shown in this map from 1897.
As it happened, they became “Ukrainian” only by writ of two of history’s greatest evil monsters – Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin – who placed them in the administrative unit of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic for reasons that have no historic validity whatsoever.
Yet a devastating war goes on there today – a war which is careening to the precipice of WWIII – because Washington encourages Kiev to insist on retention of “every inch” of a map put together by Lenin, Stalin and Khrushchev.
In fact, the latter did for the map of Ukraine what Wilson & Co. did to Germany after the Great War. That is to say, these long gone commie dictators extracted from Russian and Polish territories a combustible mongrel that begs to be partitioned and returned to the status quo ante, not defended to the last drop of Ukrainian blood and US/NATO treasure.
https://lrc-cdn.s3.amazonaws.com/assets/2022/03/new-russia.jpg
Needless to say, there is no Washington policy-maker familiar with the above map, nor Capitol Hill armchair warrior who has a clue. Most especially, by shrieking about “borders” being violated and the need for all out support to a heroic nation valiantly resisting the Russian ogre, the GOP’s bloodthirsty hawks and neocons have made it easy as pie for Biden and his national security minions to pivot to an all-out war footing against Russia, thereby distracting the American public from the abysmal failure of their domestic policies.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/03/david-stockman/washington-is-delirious-with-war-fever-for-no-reason-of-homeland-security/
