Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
CoolGenerator
Jaha. Vad är det som ej är så konstigt, för den är ganska tydlig?
Länken till sidan "Rumble" i TS börjar med fraserna:
Citat:
Ten pages of adverse events. "Deleting part of people's chromosomes" "Progressive damage to the brain."
Rapporten innehåller mycket riktigt en lång lista "Adverse Events", men som den beskriver i avsnittet "2. METHODOLOGY"
Citat:
(...)
• Because many external factors influence whether or not an AE is reported, the
spontaneous reporting system yields reporting proportions not incidence rates. As a
result, it is generally not appropriate to make between-drug comparisons using these proportions; the spontaneous reporting system should be used for signal detection
rather than hypothesis testing.
• In some reports, clinical information (such as medical history, validation of diagnosis,
time from drug use to onset of illness, dose, and use of concomitant drugs) is missing
or incomplete, and follow-up information may not be available.
• An accumulation of adverse event reports (AERs) does not necessarily indicate that a
particular AE was caused by the drug; rather, the event may be due to an underlying
disease or some other factor(s) such as past medical history or concomitant
medication.
(...)
