Valfusk under USA-valet 2020? Rapporterade incidenter.

5. I have not been granted access to examine any of the systems used in the 2020 Election. However, I
have conducted detailed analysis of the NY Times data sets and have discovered significant anomalies
are caused by fraudulent manipulation of the results. In my expert judgment, the evidence is
widespread and throughout all battleground states I have studied. I conclude the following:
a. The vote count distribution in PA, WI, MI, AZ, NV, and GA are not based on normal system
operation. Instead, they are caused by fraudulent electronic manipulation of the targeted voting
machines.
b. On approximately 2:30 AM EST, TV broadcasts reported that PA, WI, AZ, NV and GA have
decided to cease vote counting operations and will continue the following day. The unanimous
decision to intentionally stop counting by all 5 battleground states is highly unusual, possibly
Case 2:20-cv-13134-LVP-RSW ECF No. 1-19, PageID.826 Filed 11/25/20 Page 5 of 9
6
unprecedented and demonstrates prior coordination by election officials in battleground state.
There would be no legitimate reason battleground states need to pre-coordinate election
activities and stop on-going adjudication processes. However, is equally puzzling that the vote
counting did not stop, as reported. In fact, it continued behind closed doors in early hours of
November 4, 2020. This activity is highly unusually and demonstrates collusion to achieve
desired results without being monitored by watchers.
c. When analyzing the NT Times data for the 2020 election, I conclude that the software algorithm
manipulated votes counts forging between 1-2% of the precinct results to favor Vice President
Biden. The software performed data alteration in real-time in order to maintain close parity
among the candidates and without raising red flags. The specific software algorithm was
developed by Smartmatic and implemented in DVS machines to facilitate backdoor access by a
nefarious operator to manipulate live data, as desired.
d. The DVS Democracy Suite’s ImageCast Central optical scanner failed to correctly verify and
validate absentee ballots, as described in its own literature. There is reported evidence that the
optical scanner accepted and adjudicated ballots that did not have signatures or other key
features that is required for ballot validation and verification. This indicates that the DVS system
configuration was modified to accept invalid ballots when they should have been rejected.
e. After the DVS ImageCast scanner validates a ballot, by design, it is required to tabulate and store
the results in a cast vote record along with a human-readable image of the ballot that has been
scanned. The image, called AuditMark provides the user with scanned results that is verifiable.
However, media reports indicate that not only did the ImageCast fail to properly verify absentee
ballots; it also failed to maintain records of the AutitMark that would be necessary to conduct
an audit. The only way to alter this protocol is to alter the system configuration and prevent the
ImageCast scanner from rejecting illegal ballots; and reprogram AuditMark to store ballot image
Case 2:20-cv-13134-LVP-RSW ECF No. 1-19, PageID.827 Filed 11/25/20 Page 6 of 9
7
that could be verified. This is evidence of fraud perpetrated to prevent investigators to discover
the number of invalid votes that were cast.
f. The cryptographic key store on DVS thumb drive (reported stolen in Philadelphia) was used alter
vote counts prior to up chain reporting. Since DVS uses the same cryptographic key for all its
voting systems in all battleground states, the key allowed a remote operator to conduct massive
attacks on all battleground state data set without being detected.
g. Beginning on approximately 4:30 AM EST on November 4, 2020, the vote counts favored Vice
President Biden by nearly 80% in many jurisdictions. The data distribution is statistically
congruent, even when considering a larger number of absentee ballots were collected for Vice
President Biden.
h. The data variance favoring Vice President continues to accelerate after 4:30 AM EST on
November 4, 2020 and continues until it momentum through November 9, 2020. This
abnormality in variance is evident by the unusually steep slope for Vice President Biden in all
battleground states on November 4, 2020. A sudden rise in slope is not normal and
demonstrates data manipulation by artificial means. For example in PA, President Trump’s lead
of more than 700,000 count advantage was reduced to less than 300,000 in a few short hours,
which does not occur in the real world without an external influence. I conclude that manually
feeding more than 400,000 mostly absentee ballots cannot be accomplished in a short time
frame (i.e., 2-3 hours) without illegal vote count alteration. In another case for Edison County,
MI, Vice President Biden received more than 100% of the votes at 5:59 PM EST on November 4,
2020 and again he received 99.61% of the votes at 2:23 PM EST on November 5, 2020. These
distributions are cause for concern and indicate fraud.
i. DVS has acknowledged that Chinese made parts are used in its voting machines. However, the
company is unwilling to share details on its supply chains, foreign ownership, or its relationship
Case 2:20-cv-13134-LVP-RSW ECF No. 1-19, PageID.828 Filed 11/25/20 Page 7 of 9
8
with China, Venezuela and Cuba. In particular, I have seen USIC intelligence reports showing
China’s espionage activities in the United States and efforts to infiltrate elections. Since these
countries are our enemies, I conclude that FIS and other operators were involved to influence
the outcome of the 2020 election.
j. A Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) cyber attack was carried out by covert operators using
sophisticated tools, such as Hammer and Scorecard. The MITM attack occurred in two ways.
Initially, remote operatives used USB memory cards containing cryptographic keys and access
system backdoors to alter votes in battleground states. Subsequently, the results were
forwarded to Scytl/SOE Software servers located in Frankfurt, Germany (previously, Barcelona,
Spain). The MITM attack was structured to ensure sufficient data alteration had occurred prior
to forwarding the tallied results to the Scytl/eClarity Software Electronic Night Reporting (ENR)
system. The reason election data are forwarded overseas is to avoid detection and monitoring
by the USIC to obfuscate the MITM.
k. In my expert opinion, the DVS Democracy Suite, Scytl/SOE Software/eClarity and Smartmatic
have not produced auditable results in the 2020 election. It is evident that ballots were not
properly validated, system records were not kept, and the system experience considerable
instability even several days prior to November 4, 2020 that require DVS to implement software
changes at the last minute. In addition, the disparity in data distribution after 4:30 AM on
November 4, 2020 indicates significant systemic anomalies that were widespread among all
battleground states. The evidence is both extensive and persuasive and indicates large-scale
fraud by remote operators.
16. I conclude that a combination of lost cryptographic key contained on stolen USB memory cards, serious
exploitable system and software vulnerabilities and operating system backdoor in DVS, Scytl, SOE
Software/eClarity and Smartmatic created the perfect environment to commit widespread fraud in all
Case 2:20-cv-13134-LVP-RSW ECF No. 1-19, PageID.829 Filed 11/25/20 Page 8 of 9
9
states where these systems are installed. My analysis of the 2020 Election from NY Times data shows
statistical anomalies across the battleground state votes. These failures are widespread and systemic -
and sufficient to invalidate the vote counts.
17. I conclude with high confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in all battleground states
resulting in a hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for President Trump to be transferred to
Vice President Biden. These alterations were the result of systemic and widespread exploitable
vulnerabilities in DVS, Scytl/SOE Software and Smartmatic systems that enabled operators to achieve
the desired results. In my view, the evidence is overwhelming and incontrovertible.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.S. 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
America that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge

Declaration of XXXXXXXXX.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C Section 1746, I, XXXXXXXX, make the following
declaration.
1. I am over the age of 21 years and I am under no legal disability, which would prevent me
from giving this declaration.
2. I was an electronic intelligence analyst under 305th Military Intelligence with experience
gathering SAM missile system electronic intelligence. I have extensive experience as a white
hat hacker used by some of the top election specialists in the world. The methodologies I
have employed represent industry standard cyber operation toolkits for digital forensics and
OSINT, which are commonly used to certify connections between servers, network nodes
and other digital properties and probe to network system vulnerabilities.

21. In my professional opinion, this affidavit presents unambiguous evidence that Dominion
Voter Systems and Edison Research have been accessible and were certainly compromised
by rogue actors, such as Iran and China. By using servers and employees connected with
rogue actors and hostile foreign influences combined with numerous easily discoverable
leaked credentials, these organizations neglectfully allowed foreign adversaries to access data

and intentionally provided access to their infrastructure in order to monitor and manipulate
elections, including the most recent one in 2020. This represents a complete failure of their
duty to provide basic cyber security. This is not a technological issue, but rather a
governance and basic security issue: if it is not corrected, future elections in the United States
and beyond will not be secure and citizens will not have confidence in the results.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge. Executed this November 23th, 2020.

Declaration of XXXXXXXXX.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C Section 1746, I, XXXXXXXX, make the following
declaration.
1. I am over the age of 21 years and I am under no legal disability, which would prevent me
from giving this declaration.
2. I was an electronic intelligence analyst under 305th Military Intelligence with experience
gathering SAM missile system electronic intelligence. I have extensive experience as a white
hat hacker used by some of the top election specialists in the world. The methodologies I
have employed represent industry standard cyber operation toolkits for digital forensics and
OSINT, which are commonly used to certify connections between servers, network nodes
and other digital properties and probe to network system vulnerabilities.

21. In my professional opinion, this affidavit presents unambiguous evidence that Dominion
Voter Systems and Edison Research have been accessible and were certainly compromised
by rogue actors, such as Iran and China. By using servers and employees connected with
rogue actors and hostile foreign influences combined with numerous easily discoverable
leaked credentials, these organizations neglectfully allowed foreign adversaries to access data

and intentionally provided access to their infrastructure in order to monitor and manipulate
elections, including the most recent one in 2020. This represents a complete failure of their
duty to provide basic cyber security. This is not a technological issue, but rather a
governance and basic security issue: if it is not corrected, future elections in the United States
and beyond will not be secure and citizens will not have confidence in the results.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge. Executed this November 23th, 2020.