Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Bunsofsteel
FHM vilseleder ang. stängda skolors betydelse:
https://medium.com/@kebe_21648/why-it-is-hard-to-trust-the-swedish-health-authorities-fohm-reporting-during-the-pandemic-60ded1c00c d9
Fler som insett det jag precis skrev tidigare i tråden att jämförelsen mellan svenska och finska skolor är helt felaktig då i princip inga svenska barn testades under perioden som FHM:s rapport bygger på...
"The report proclaims that “There is no difference in the overall incidence of the laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 cases in the age group 1–19 years in the two countries”.
This is the result that has been widely publicized in international media, and it is sometimes cited when policymakers in other countries contemplate whether to open schools in the autumn or keep them closed. However, using reported cases to draw the conclusion that school closures were ineffective is not scientifically sound, as it was extremely difficult for a child to be tested in Sweden during the study period. The conclusion of the report is that the” Closing of schools had no measurable effect on the number of cases of Covid-19 among children”,
which is profoundly misleading."
Att FHM jobbar evidensbaserat är rent nys. Datat stödjer inte slutsatserna som görs i rapporten.
Rent hittepå.
Ja, jag håller fullständigt med dig! Man känner sig fullständigt utelämnad till dessa människors inkompetens och godtycklighet! Det är absurt! Som en Kafka roman.
Ytterligare utdrag ur artikeln:
”In an article published by Gretchen Vogel in Science Mag on May 22, she opines that Sweden might have been the country to answer the burning questions about the effects of transmission of Covid-19 by school children and notes that “Sweden failed to collect any data.” (ref. 1). According to Vogel the Swedish authorities
“have failed to track infections among school children — even when large outbreaks led to the closure of individual schools or staff members died of the disease.”
Sweden`s state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell paused the collection of data because he viewed it as not being important nor advantageous. In fact, one of the excuses offered by Tegnell for the decision to pause data collection was that there was a certain risk of In an article published by Gretchen Vogel in Science Mag on May 22, she opines that Sweden might have been the country to answer the burning questions about the effects of transmission of Covid-19 by school children and notes that “Sweden failed to collect any data.” (ref. 1). According to Vogel the Swedish authorities
“have failed to track infections among school children — even when large outbreaks led to the closure of individual schools or staff members died of the disease.”
Sweden`s state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell paused the collection of data because he viewed it as not being important nor advantageous. In fact,
one of the excuses offered by Tegnell for the decision to pause data collection was that there was a certain risk of creating anxiety in a population by asking questions around Covid-19.
