Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Alpoxen
Hmm. Ett litet problem med din analys är att inget, absolut ingenting, tyder på att du har rätt och att Q skulle vara något annat än ett skämt. Sen kan du leta efter coincidences i nyhetsflödet hur mycket du vill.
Alla vet vilket spin du hade lagt på nyheten om Cohen hade frikänts, eller hur. Hur hade det låtit då? Allt går att passa in i planen i efterhand eftersom det inte finns någon plan.
Att Trump lovade sina väljare en mur och att Mexarna skulle betala för den var hans viktigaste vallöfte. Hur har det gått med det? Ingår det i planen att efter två år inte ha ett skit att visa upp på den fronten.Om nu militärens ingenjörer ska bygga den, varför tog han inte dit dem dag ett och sa åt dem att sätta igång?
Trump måste ha läst din replik då han svarade på båda dina frågor på Twitter under dagen. Egg and face, it’s all coming together.
Citat:
I never directed Michael Cohen to break the law. He was a lawyer and he is supposed to know the law. It is called “advice of counsel,” and a lawyer has great liability if a mistake is made. That is why they get paid. Despite that many campaign finance lawyers have strongly......
....stated that I did nothing wrong with respect to campaign finance laws, if they even apply, because this was not campaign finance. Cohen was guilty on many charges unrelated to me, but he plead to two campaign charges which were not criminal and of which he probably was not...
....guilty even on a civil basis. Those charges were just agreed to by him in order to embarrass the president and get a much reduced prison sentence, which he did-including the fact that his family was temporarily let off the hook. As a lawyer, Michael has great liability to me!
Citat:
I often stated, “One way or the other, Mexico is going to pay for the Wall.” This has never changed. Our new deal with Mexico (and Canada), the USMCA, is so much better than the old, very costly & anti-USA NAFTA deal, that just by the money we save, MEXICO IS PAYING FOR THE WALL!
