Citat:
Det är en intressant länk, ett par frågor,
Är metoden beskriven efter Q eller är alla stegen tagna från en metod som tagits fram för den här typen av psyops? Har du isåfall en länk till var metoden är beskriven (som inte börjar med ett email till Soros och innefattar Q)?
Jag gissar att det är CIA lektion 101 i hur man får igång en gräsrotsrörelse och störtar valfri diktatur men det vore kul att se en källa.
Länken är till Cindy Wood men det är en Mike Wood som skrivit sidan, vad har dom två för koppling till varandra?
Är metoden beskriven efter Q eller är alla stegen tagna från en metod som tagits fram för den här typen av psyops? Har du isåfall en länk till var metoden är beskriven (som inte börjar med ett email till Soros och innefattar Q)?
Jag gissar att det är CIA lektion 101 i hur man får igång en gräsrotsrörelse och störtar valfri diktatur men det vore kul att se en källa.
Länken är till Cindy Wood men det är en Mike Wood som skrivit sidan, vad har dom två för koppling till varandra?
Bra fråga, det verkar vara nyskrivet utifrån en blandning av tidigare observationer och analys av tidigare kulter och analys av Q-fenomenet, såhär beskriver han det själv:
Psychologically, we have some insight into why this happens – hell, Dorothy Martin’s cult was the subject of “When Prophecy Fails,” one of the foundational texts of social psychology. I’ ll do my best to break down how this works, step by step, using some of that psychology and some of my own observations. As best I can, I’ve tried to accompany each step with some illustrative examples from all of these previous sources (though it’s easier to find Q’s text online – the ZetaTalk website is a mess, NESARA is spread over a billion different 90s websites, etc.).Men jag kan inte se att han har använt precis samma beskrivningar tidigare - fast jag har inte ägnat ens fem minuter åt att leta, men jag länkar hans publikationer - vissa är läsbara direkt på nätet - i spoiler om länken nedan skulle krångla igen (då går han ändå att hitta via universitetets alfabetiska register)
Journal articles
Wood, M.J. (2016) Conspiracy suspicions as a proxy for beliefs in conspiracy theories: Implications for theory and measurement. British Journal of Psychology. Read it online
Wood, M.J. (2015). Some dare call it conspiracy: Labeling something a conspiracy theory does not reduce belief in it. Political Psychology. Read it online.
Wood, M.J. and Thomae, M. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349 (6251). Open Science Collaboration.
Wood, M.J., & Douglas, K.M. (2013). “What about Building 7?” A social psychological analysis of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories. Frontiers in Psychology, 4: 409.
Chen, L., Meier, K.M., Blair, M.R., Watson, M.R., & Wood, M.J. (2012). Temporal characteristics of overt attentional behavior during category learning. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 244-256.
Wood, M.J., Douglas, K.M., & Sutton, R.M. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 767-773.
Wood, M.J., & Blair, M.R. (2011). Informed inferences of unknown feature values in categorization. Memory & Cognition, 39, 666-674.
Book chapters
Douglas, K.M., Sutton, R.M., Jolley, D., & Wood, M.J. (2015). The social, political, environmental, and health-related consequences of conspiracy theories: Problems and potential solutions. In M. Bilewicz, A. Cichocka & W. Soral (Eds), The psychology of conspiracy. Hove: Routledge.
Conference proceedings
Wood, M.J., Fry., M., & Blair, M.R. (2010). The price is right: A high information access cost facilitates category learning. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 236-41). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Blair, M.R., Chen, L.C., Meier, K.M., Wood, M.J., Watson, M.R., Wong, U. (2009). The Impact of Category Type and Working Memory Span on Attentional Learning in Categorization. In N.A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3127-32). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Conferences
Wood, M.J. (2015). Romance, spin, and propaganda: The role of mass media in the spread of conspiracy theories. Paper presented at the Conference on Conspiracy Theories, University of Miami, USA.
Wood, M.J., & Gray, D.R. (2014). Right-wing authoritarianism and beliefs in conspiracy theories. Poster presented at the British Psychological Society Annual Conference (Social Section), Canterbury Christ Church University.
Wood. M.J. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Presentation given at the British Psychological Society Annual Conference 2012, London, UK.
Wood, M.J. (2012). What are they hiding? The curious effectiveness of indirect advocacy of conspiracy theories. Presentation given at the 27thPsyPAG Annual Conference, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Wood, M.J., & Douglas, K.M. (2011). “I’m just asking questions!” Conspiracy theories, complexity, and innuendo. Poster presented at the 16th General Meeting of the European Association for Social Psychology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Wood, M.J. (2016) Conspiracy suspicions as a proxy for beliefs in conspiracy theories: Implications for theory and measurement. British Journal of Psychology. Read it online
Wood, M.J. (2015). Some dare call it conspiracy: Labeling something a conspiracy theory does not reduce belief in it. Political Psychology. Read it online.
Wood, M.J. and Thomae, M. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349 (6251). Open Science Collaboration.
Wood, M.J., & Douglas, K.M. (2013). “What about Building 7?” A social psychological analysis of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories. Frontiers in Psychology, 4: 409.
Chen, L., Meier, K.M., Blair, M.R., Watson, M.R., & Wood, M.J. (2012). Temporal characteristics of overt attentional behavior during category learning. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 244-256.
Wood, M.J., Douglas, K.M., & Sutton, R.M. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 767-773.
Wood, M.J., & Blair, M.R. (2011). Informed inferences of unknown feature values in categorization. Memory & Cognition, 39, 666-674.
Book chapters
Douglas, K.M., Sutton, R.M., Jolley, D., & Wood, M.J. (2015). The social, political, environmental, and health-related consequences of conspiracy theories: Problems and potential solutions. In M. Bilewicz, A. Cichocka & W. Soral (Eds), The psychology of conspiracy. Hove: Routledge.
Conference proceedings
Wood, M.J., Fry., M., & Blair, M.R. (2010). The price is right: A high information access cost facilitates category learning. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 236-41). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Blair, M.R., Chen, L.C., Meier, K.M., Wood, M.J., Watson, M.R., Wong, U. (2009). The Impact of Category Type and Working Memory Span on Attentional Learning in Categorization. In N.A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3127-32). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Conferences
Wood, M.J. (2015). Romance, spin, and propaganda: The role of mass media in the spread of conspiracy theories. Paper presented at the Conference on Conspiracy Theories, University of Miami, USA.
Wood, M.J., & Gray, D.R. (2014). Right-wing authoritarianism and beliefs in conspiracy theories. Poster presented at the British Psychological Society Annual Conference (Social Section), Canterbury Christ Church University.
Wood. M.J. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Presentation given at the British Psychological Society Annual Conference 2012, London, UK.
Wood, M.J. (2012). What are they hiding? The curious effectiveness of indirect advocacy of conspiracy theories. Presentation given at the 27thPsyPAG Annual Conference, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Wood, M.J., & Douglas, K.M. (2011). “I’m just asking questions!” Conspiracy theories, complexity, and innuendo. Poster presented at the 16th General Meeting of the European Association for Social Psychology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Vete fasen vad som hände med länken - måste klickat snett nånstans.. Här är den rätta länken: https://www.winchester.ac.uk/about-us/leadership-and-governance/staff-directory/staff-profiles/wood.php
