Ni två i tråden som jämt talar om internationella lagar och hur viktigt det är att följa dom. Hur kan ni nu stå och hoppas på att Usa ska invadera Syrien. Ni vet vilka ni är.
Här är några jurister som påtalar hur fel en attack ifrån Usa är. Ska vi skita i alla tidigare människors arbeten för att sätta regler och lagar och ha anarki, eller bör vi följa lagarna som finns och arbeta efter dom. Vad tycker ni två?
International Lawyers: Strike Against Syria Would Be Illegal
Citat:
We are practitioners and professors of international law. Under international law, military strikes by the United States of America and its allies against the Syrian Arab Republic, unless conducted in self-defense or with United Nations Security Council approval, are illegal and constitute acts of aggression.
The unlawful killing of any human being without legal justification, under every legal system, is murder. And an act of violence committed by one government against another government, without lawful justification, amounts to the crime of aggression: the supreme international crime which carries with it the evil of every other international crime, as noted by the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg in 1946.
Citat:
The use of military force by a state can be used in self-defense after an armed attack by another state, or, with the approval of the United Nations Security Council. At present, neither instance would apply to a U.S. strike against Syria.
We understand the urge to act to protect innocent civilians. We strongly condemn any and all violence against civilians, whoever the perpetrators. But responding to unlawful violence with more unlawful violence, bypassing existing legal mechanisms, is a road to a lawless world. It is a road that leads to Hell.
https://consortiumnews.com/2018/04/11/international-lawyers-strike-against-syria-would-be-illegal/
Fast om jag känner er rätt så är ni några hala jävlar, och kommer så klart att ha en bra ursäkt för att kringå dessa lagar.