Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Redax
Hur som helst har jag visat att medierna inte aningslöst går på detta. Vilket var trådens påstående.
Medierna? Du länkade
EN tidning.
CNN, precis som flera andra mediebolag, nämner ingenting om
“working the refs” utan går stenhårt på defensiven.
"Vi rapporterar visst! Här! Titta!"
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/02/07/opinions/trump-claim-on-under-covering-terrorism-is-baloney-bergen/index.html
Citat:
Now comes President Donald Trump's claim Monday at the key US military base overseeing the war on ISIS -- US Central Command in Tampa, Florida -- that the media aren't reporting terrorism for "reasons" the President didn't elaborate upon.
Trump told the CENTCOM audience, "You've seen what happened in Paris and Nice. All over Europe, it's happening. It's gotten to a point where it's not even being reported. And in many cases, the very, very dishonest press doesn't want to report it. They have their reasons, and you understand that."
To "prove" that the media aren't covering terrorism adequately the Trump White House, which is fighting in court to reinstate a refugee ban citing the terrorist threat, on Monday night released a list of 78 "major" terrorist attacks since September 2014, claiming, "Most have not received the media attention they deserved."
Ingenstans i denna artikel gör man minsta antydan om att man minsann vet att det hela bara var ett sätt att få medierna att kavla ut alla terroristdåd på bästa sändningstid och därmed poängtera det logiska med ett reseförbud.