Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Klamdamp
Dr Paul LaViolette.
En snabb googling på hans namn säger det mesta.
Och han får dessutom chansen att föreläsa lite om sina ämnen och intressen.
I lectured later that day, speaking about the gigantic ice age floods that once swept through that region, how they covered the pyramid with flood deposits. I also spoke a bit about galactic superwaves and about advanced science concepts encoded in ancient constellation lore.
Fast han är tydligen enormt nydanande inom fysik och diverse andra ämnen.
http://ufology.wikia.com/wiki/Paul_LaViolette
He is the developer of subquantum kinetics, a novel approach to microphysics that accounts for electric, magnetic, gravitational, and nuclear forces in a unified manner and resolves many long-standing physics problems. Based on the predictions of this theory, he developed an alternative cosmology that effectively replaces the big bang theory. Dr. LaViolette has also developed a new theory of gravity that replaces the deeply flawed theory of general relativity. Predicted from subquantum kinetics, it accounts for the electrogravitic coupling phenomenon discovered by Townsend Brown and may explain the advanced aerospace propulsion technology utilized in the B-2 bomber.
Mycket imponerande, inte minst att han har lyckats få fram en gravitationsteori....som dock ingen annan fysiker har något större intresse av.
Och dessutom Subquantum kinetics, ett mycket intressant ämne, som dock endast verkar forskas i av ett enda institut.....LaViolette's eget The Starburst Foundation.....
Och jag visste inte att General Electrics F-118 jetmotor var betecknad som "advanced aerospace propulsion technology".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Electric_F118
In addition to his understanding of UFO and black budget craft propulsion systems, including materialization and dematerialization, he has deep knowledge of the inner workings of the U.S. Patent Office.
Nå, det sista, om insikt i US patent office kan däremot vara väldigt bra att ha.
He states in this interview that, currently, if an invention doesn’t fit into the accepted physics paradigm, the patent examiners immediately reject it thinking it violates the paradigm and must be a mistake. In effect, new energy technologies are the underdog: They don’t fit the paradigm so they are left out of the needed funding, or their patents are denied — even to the point that the Patent Office is breaking the law. In order to alleviate the current Earth crises of environmental pollution, global warming, etc. and advance as a technological society, we need technologies that don’t fit into the old paradigm.
Eller kanske inte.
Jag tror den här frasen i slutet, som text till en bild (längst ner, innan kommentarsfältet) fungerar som en bra illustration över den generella kvalitén på den här artikeln och dess vetenskapliga pålitlighet.
Normally invisible orbs seen floating in the air in my first camera shot.
