Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
micro113
Nej, det sägs ingenstans i bibeln.
Det är inget som sägs i bibeln
Fast diskussionen handlade inte om vad någon med samma vanföreställningar som du själv tyckte - utan om vad bibeln säger.
Efter lite snabbt googlande så fick jag fram det här:
http://www.godrules.net/articles/harlotry.htm
Citat:
First, let me point out the main error that many Christians make when reading scripture. This is probably the single most significant error I can think of, when studying this topic. Please look at this Bible verse below and tell me what you think it says:
23:17 There shall be no whore 6948 of the daughters 1323 of Israel 3478, nor a sodomite 6945 of the sons 1121 of Israel 3478.(whore: or, sodomitess) - Deuteronomy 23:17-18
The term "whore" is literally "female temple prostitute" and the term "sodomite" is literally "male temple prostitute".
Here is the basic summation of how the Bible views prostitution:
Sex with a non-married temple prostitute = Sexual Idolatry
Sex with a married temple prostitute = Adultery & Idolatry
Sex with a non-married prostitute = Not a sin.
Sex with a married prostitute = Adultery
De enda formerna av prostitution som fördöms i Bibeln är "tempelprostitution" (involverar dyrkan av andra gudar och mycket mer), gifta prostituerade kvinnor och männen som har sex med dem och prästdöttrar som prostituerar sig. Ogifta prostituerade kvinnor som inte var under sin faders hushåll finns det däremot inga straff för.
Vissa rättfärdiga judar i Gamla Testamentet hade sex med ogifta prostituerade och de fördöms inte:
Citat:
OK, now, lets look at all the scriptures on prostitution in the Bible and see what we find:
In this passage, Judah was not rebuked or punished for having sex with someone he thought was a whore.
"2:1 And Joshua the son of Nun sent out of Shittim two men to spy secretly, saying, Go view the land, even Jericho. And they went, and came into an harlot's house, named Rahab, and lodged there." - Joshua 2:1
Here, we see two men, chosen by Joshua to scout the land of Jericho. And when they arrive to Jericho, they stay at a prostitute's house. Her name was Rahab and she is praised in the Hall of Faith and also is an ancestor of Jesus Christ. She was not an "inn keaper" or a "hostess". If you look at the Hebrew words for "harlot's house", you discover it means, "house of a woman who is a harlot".
Rahab later on married Salma and gave birth to Boaz, who ended up being Ruth's husband, who is an ancestor of Jesus Christ
Du missförstår även Paulus ord förstår inte kontexten som han skriver det inom.
Citat:
You may ask, "Well what about these two passages?"
"6:15 Know ye not that your bodies are the members of Christ? shall I then take the members of Christ, and make [them] the members of an harlot? God forbid. 6:16 What? know ye not that he which is joined to an harlot is one body? for two, saith he, shall be one flesh. 6:17 But he that is joined unto the Lord is one spirit. 6:18 Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body. [article] 6:19 What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost [which is] in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own? 6:20 For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's." - 1 Corinthians 6:15-20
"3:16 Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and [that] the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? 3:17 If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which [temple] ye are." - 1 Corinthians 3:16-
Will not "God destroy you" if you join yourself to a harlot?
Actually, this is a very fair question. After doing a bit of research, I discovered a few things of great relevance. First, the Historian Strabo indicates that in 7th Century B.C., Corinth's Temple to Aphrodite employed 1000 cultic temple prostitutes. Now many historians seem to "squable" regarding whether it truly was 1000 temple prostitutes in 7th Century BC, as it is questionable what source Strabo used for this information. However, the only reason they contest is because Strabo was living in (ca. 64 BC-AD 21) and he would not have direct prima facie knowledge of what was occuring in 7th century Corinth. During Strabo's time, Rome had already conquered Corinth and had significant influence over it, and much of the operations at the Temple of Aphrodite had diminished. So, if you research it, you will discover many seem to down play this idea of Corinth being filled with temple prostitutes.
HOWEVER, I found one very interesting line, which many seem to miss:
"Prostitutes were regularly regarded as devotees of Aphrodite in Greek literature, but that does not make them cult prostitutes per se." - Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 42.3 (1999): 443-460
Isn't that an interesting little statement? Most people in Corinth during the time of Paul, regularly regarded harlots as "devotees of Aphrodite". So, in other words, they were not doing "official harlotry for Aphrodite", but still considered their "harlotry" unto Aphrodite. Would that not make them an unofficial "temple prostitute" in God's sight? According to God's Law, yes.
Now, I mentioned all of this, because a lot of "historians" downplay this "temple prostitute" idea. However, we are not looking for "official" temple prostitutes, but rather, harlots doing their service unto false gods, whether officially or unofficially. Now, lets discuss this passage of Paul's. Notice, it says "ye are the temple of God". Why would Paul mention you are the temple of God, while talking about "harlots", unless he was directly refering to the "temple prostitutes" of Corinth? So, it is about looking at the scripture in context to the time, location and people being written to.
Further, Paul seems to be making an argument against sleeping with these harlots, by saying "your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost". So, saying the body is a temple, and that bringing an idol into a temple would "defile" it. So, if it was refering to a normal prostitute, it does not make a lot of sense to argue this way. But, if he is refering to these temple prostitutes, it makes a great deal of sense, as she is worshipping an idol and you are bring her body, an "idolatrous body temple", and making it one with your body, a "temple to the Holy Ghost", hence defiling the temple of God. For which, God would destroy you as a result.
Last, it says "ye are bought with a price". What is this refering to? It is refering to the marriage design instituted in the Old Testament. In that a man would pay the "dowry" or "price" for his bride and she is then his wife. So, you are bought with a price and are married to Jesus Christ. Now, a question for you: "If you are married to Jesus Christ, can you marry another?" The answer to that question is "No". But, the Bible makes it clear that Christian men and women can marry. Therefore, it is not speaking of physical marriage, but rather spiritual marriage. So, Paul is saying you are to flee fornication, because you are spiritually married to Jesus Christ. And from this, we can see that this fornication violates your spiritual marriage to Christ. Since it is not refering to physical marriage (as you are allowed to marry another Christian), it is refering to a fornication that is "spiritual". And looking at the preceding verses, we see it discussing "harlots". How can harlots make you cheat on God spiritually? Only if there is idolatry involved. Therefore, Paul is speaking of temple harlotry.
Så kristna som vill förbjuda ogift prostitution har inget stöd för det i Bibeln. Prostitution är ett nödvändigt ont för samhället som helhet så att vi inte får stora hopar av sexuellt frustrerade män likt Elliot Rodgers som saknar närhet och kontakt med det motsatta könet. Även många tidiga kristna ledare som skulle betraktas som anti-sexuella idag såg prostitution som ett nödvändigt ont för att stävja sexuell frustration och annat bland män:
Citat:
Thomas Aquinas: "Accordingly in human government also, those who are in authority rightly tolerate certain evils, lest certain goods be lost, or certain evils be incurred: thus Augustine says [De ordine 2.4]: If you do away with harlots, the world will be convulsed with lust.'"
Citat:
St. Augustine: "Suppress prostitution, and capricious lusts will overthrow society."
Men jag antar väl att feminister vill ha ett samhälle med sexuellt frustrerade män som begår fruktansvärda brott för att de blir berövade kvinnlig närhet. Och nej, jag talar inte om trafficking eller gatuprostitution utan om vanliga säkra bordeller och escorter.
Och förresten, hur vanligt är det egentligen med trafficking eller gatuprostitution idag? Vilka män är egentligen intresserade av att gå till knarkande street hookers eller kvinnor som blir tvingade? Det vanligaste är nog att män hellre lägger slantarna på snygga privata escorter, escorterande porrstjärnor eller säkra bordeller med kvinnor som inte tvingas till nånting.
Varför ska sådant förbjudas?
Har inte hört ett enda bra argument av feminister till varför säkra bordeller eller escortköp ska förbjudas.
