Citat:
Nej, och det handlar inte heller bara om vem som är bättre utan vem som passar laget bäst.
Suarez är en duktig spelare men det går inte att komma bort från att han skjuter mycket och har en bristande spelförståelse. Lägg till att vi redan har en spelare som skjuter mycket (Ronaldo skjuter mest sett till Europas toppligor). Jag är tveksam till en sån kombo men det är ändå svårt att tacka nej till en spelare som Suarez om han kommer till rätt pris.
Mixed kNuts har skrivit rätt bra om Suarez:
Citat:
Suarez 2012-2013
This is not an impressive year:
---
Let’s start with the good. 2nd in the Premier League in goals. 1st in Shots per Game. 3rd in Key Passes per game. 1st in successful dribbles per game. Suarez was a handful and then some.
Now for the bad. 1st in the league for being dispossessed. 2nd for turning the ball over. 3rd in Offsides per game. Great key pass numbers, but only 5 assists on the season. A 76.6% pass rate. (For comparison, Mata and Hazard were both over 85%, RVP was 80.2%.) A 12.2% conversion rate on total shots.
This season Luis Suarez was really good at creating offense for himself and his teammates. At the same time, he was surprisingly bad at turning that offensive creation into goals.
Judging players on just one season leads to bad decision making. Let’s take a gander at the 2012 model as well.
Suarez 2011-2012
This is not an impressive year:
---
Fewer key passes. Similar turnover and dispossession rates. Worse passing, fewer shots per game, and a far worse conversion rate. And by far worse I mean a non-penalty conversion rate of 8.6%, which is a horrific, season-killing number.
Compared to last year, Suarez’s 2013 was amazing, but part of that is because last season was so bad.
Here are the two sides of the commemorative Luis Suarez coin.
1) He creates a lot of offense.
2) He’s incredibly inefficient.
Side 1 is clearly very good. Though the media rarely focus on it, side 2 is actually quite bad.
Liverpool averaged the most shots per game of any team in the big 5 leagues last season at 19.4. That’s an outstanding feat, and it’s more than Bayern Munich, Barcelona, and Real Madrid.
But did they score the most goals?
No, not by some distance. In fact, they were 4th in the Premier League alone. The reason for this is because their attack was inefficient, and Suarez is a big reason for it. It came as a surprise to me, but systemically, Liverpool create about the same number of shots with and without Luis Suarez in the lineup. If shot creation is equal with and without Suarez, the only way they can score more goals is by becoming more efficient.
And Luis Suarez is the most inefficient superstar forward in the world.
---
http://mixedknuts.wordpress.com/2013/05/29/the-suarez-conundrum/
This is not an impressive year:
---
Let’s start with the good. 2nd in the Premier League in goals. 1st in Shots per Game. 3rd in Key Passes per game. 1st in successful dribbles per game. Suarez was a handful and then some.
Now for the bad. 1st in the league for being dispossessed. 2nd for turning the ball over. 3rd in Offsides per game. Great key pass numbers, but only 5 assists on the season. A 76.6% pass rate. (For comparison, Mata and Hazard were both over 85%, RVP was 80.2%.) A 12.2% conversion rate on total shots.
This season Luis Suarez was really good at creating offense for himself and his teammates. At the same time, he was surprisingly bad at turning that offensive creation into goals.
Judging players on just one season leads to bad decision making. Let’s take a gander at the 2012 model as well.
Suarez 2011-2012
This is not an impressive year:
---
Fewer key passes. Similar turnover and dispossession rates. Worse passing, fewer shots per game, and a far worse conversion rate. And by far worse I mean a non-penalty conversion rate of 8.6%, which is a horrific, season-killing number.
Compared to last year, Suarez’s 2013 was amazing, but part of that is because last season was so bad.
Here are the two sides of the commemorative Luis Suarez coin.
1) He creates a lot of offense.
2) He’s incredibly inefficient.
Side 1 is clearly very good. Though the media rarely focus on it, side 2 is actually quite bad.
Liverpool averaged the most shots per game of any team in the big 5 leagues last season at 19.4. That’s an outstanding feat, and it’s more than Bayern Munich, Barcelona, and Real Madrid.
But did they score the most goals?
No, not by some distance. In fact, they were 4th in the Premier League alone. The reason for this is because their attack was inefficient, and Suarez is a big reason for it. It came as a surprise to me, but systemically, Liverpool create about the same number of shots with and without Luis Suarez in the lineup. If shot creation is equal with and without Suarez, the only way they can score more goals is by becoming more efficient.
And Luis Suarez is the most inefficient superstar forward in the world.
---
http://mixedknuts.wordpress.com/2013/05/29/the-suarez-conundrum/
Citat:
Cavani är också en bättre targetspelare, smartare, och en bättre avslutare.
