Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av Bronco68
trams
Det är så sött när historielösa troll tror sig "veta".
Innan andra världskriget och den koloniala drömmen var över bestod mellanöstern av i princip ett enda stort arabiskt kalifat där människorna identifierade sig utifrån religion snarare än etnicitet. Nationalismen dök upp först efter koloniseringen avslutats. Baserat på klaner beboddes ytan. I och med romarna, sedan turkarna, sedan britterna med fransmännen som koloniserade området, var det nu dags att lägga ner de koloniala drömmarna, urbefolkningen skulle få sina rättigheter och sitt land lovade britterna, om muslimerna hjälpte britterna köra ut turkarna. Gång på gång spelar väst dubbelspel mot muslimerna. Därav talar man om före krigstiden och efter krigstiden.
I och med politiska komplikationer och en stark judisk migration till området pga. förföljelser i övriga världen, protesterade muslimerna, rädslan för att förlora sitt land var orsaken. En etnisk resning skedde, känd som Al Nakba. Muslimernas fara besannades. Judiska terror organisationer mördade människor som kunde skada deras sak, även den Svenska fredsmedlaren Folke Bernadotte.
Jag nämner Bernadotte av en viktig anledning, det hans förslag bestod av och hur det bemöttes av båda parter:
http://www.palestineremembered.com/Acre/Palestine-Remembered/Story564.html#1948
Citat:
28-29 June 1948
Count Bernadotte suggests economic, military, and political union of Transjordan and Palestine containing Arab and Jewish states: Negev and central Palestine to go to Arabs; Western Galilee to Jews; Jerusalem to be part of Arab state with administrative autonomy for Jews; Haifa and Jaffa to be free ports and Lydda free airport. Rejected by both sides.
Hur kommer de sig att en minoritet lyckas få en majoritet av landytan till slut?
Inte ens Jordaniens kung ville överta området, enligt dem själva ville de försvara civila obeväpnade muslimer, inte förrän samarbetet med Yishuv och vikten av FN medlemskap (erkännande) förändrades det, frågan lyder, vilken jävla ockupation talar ni om? Så vitt jag vet handlade det om en annektion under tumultet då britterna inte höll sitt löfte. Idag annekterar någon annan området, detta var urbefolkningen rädda för under den stora judiska migrationen under första hälften av 1900 talet. Syrien hade hand om vissa områden där klaner i Jordanien inte gick med på att ge upp, allt pga. att gränser ritades upp av britterna och fransmännen uppstod konflikt. Se exemplet Libanon, där talar man franska som andraspråk, i Palestina är det Engelska. Det beror främst på att britterna kontrollerade Palestina och fransmännen Libanon. Det går att fördjupa sig något oerhört, men varför skulle jag lägga ner tid på någon som dig? Någon som tar TS inlägg som seriöst, utan att själva kritiskt ställa sig till frågorna som ställs.
Varför alltid tala om allt annat än Israels skuld?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transjordan
Citat:
Following the French occupation in Damascus in July 1920, the French, acting in accordance with their wartime agreements with Britain refrained from extending their rule south into Transjordan. That autumn Emir Faisal's brother, Abdullah, led a band of armed men north from the Hedjaz into Transjordan and threatened to attack Syria and vindicate the Hashemites' right to overlordship there. Samuel seized the opportunity to press the case for British control. He succeeded. In March 1921 the Colonial Secretary, Winston Churchill, visited the Middle East and endorsed an arrangement whereby Transjordan would be removed from the original territory of Palestine, with Abdullah as the emir under the authority of the High Commissioner, and with the condition that the Jewish National Home provisions of the (future) Palestine mandate would not apply there. Effectively, this removed about 78% of the original territory of Palestine and left about 22% where the application of the Balfour Declaration calling for a "Jewish" national home could be applied.
Citat:
Under the Ottoman empire, Transjordan did not correspond to any previous historical, cultural or political division, though most of it belonged to the Vilayet of Syria and a strategically important southern section with an outlet to the Red Sea were incorporated into Transjordan by Abdullah, the provinces of Ma'an and Aqaba from the Vilayet of Hejaz.[3]
There were extensive pre-existing cultural, linguistic and religious ties between the populations living on the east of the Jordan river with those living on the west of the Jordan river.[4] The inhabitants of northern Jordan had traditionally associated with Syria, and those of southern Jordan with the Arabian Peninsula.
Citat:
The British administration in Jerusalem only ever covered the area west of the Jordan, while the area east of the Jordan was administered by the British representative in Ma'an, Captain Alex Kirkbride[5] until the arrival in November 1920 of Abdullah. The Mandate for Palestine, while specifying actions in support of Jewish immigration and political status, stated that in the territory to the east of the Jordan River, Britain could 'postpone or withhold' those articles of the Mandate concerning a Jewish National Home.[6] Abdullah established his government on 11 April 1921.[7]
In August 1922, the British government presented a memorandum to the League of Nations stating that Transjordan would be excluded from all the provisions dealing with Jewish settlement, and this memorandum was approved by the League on 12 August. From that point onwards, Britain administered the part west of the Jordan as Palestine, and the part east of the Jordan as Transjordan.[8] Technically they remained one mandate, but most official documents referred to them as if they were two separate mandates.
Transjordan remained under British control until the first Anglo-Transjordanian treaty was concluded in 1928.
The borders and territory of Transjordan were not determined until after the Mandate came into effect. The borders in the east of the country were designed so as to aid the British in building an oil pipeline from their Mandate of Iraq through Transjordan to seaports in the Palestine Mandate.
Citat:
The works of Benny Morris, Avi Shlaim, Ilan Pappe, Mary Wilson, Eugene Rogan, and other historians outline a modus vivendi agreement between Abdullah and the Yishuv. Those works are taught in most Israeli university courses on the history, political science, and sociology of the region.[26] Archival materials reveal that the parties had negotiated the non-belligerent partition of Palestine between themselves, and that initially they had agreed to abide by the terms of the UN resolution. John Baggot Glubb, the commander of the Arab Legion, wrote that British Foreign Secretary Bevin had given the green light for the Arab Legion to occupy the territory allocated to the Arab state. The Prime Minister of Transjordan explained that Abdullah had received hundreds of petitions from Palestinian notables requesting protection upon the withdrawal of the British forces. Eugene Rogan says that those petitions, from nearly every town and village in Palestine, are preserved in "The Hashemite Documents: The Papers of Abdullah bin al-Husayn, volume V: Palestine 1948 (Amman 1995)".[27]
After the mandate was terminated, the armed forces of Transjordan entered Palestine. The Security Council adopted a US-backed resolution that inquired about the number and disposition of Transjordan's armed forces in Palestine. The Foreign Minister of Transjordan replied that neither the UN nor US recognized Transjordan, although they both had been given the opportunity for more than two years. Yet the US had recognized the Jewish state immediately, although its qualifications were lacking.[28]
Abdullah explained Transjordan's armed forces entry into Palestine to the Security Council saying "we were compelled to enter Palestine to protect unarmed Arabs against massacres similar to those of Deir Yassin."[29]
After capturing the West Bank area of Cisjordan during the 1948–49 war with Israel, Abdullah took the title King of Jordan, and he officially changed the country's name to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan in April 1949. The following year he annexed the West Bank.
The United States extended de jure recognition to the Government of Transjordan and the Government of Israel on the same day, 31 January 1949.[30] Clea Bunch said that "President Truman crafted a balanced policy between Israel and its moderate Hashemite neighbours when he simultaneously extended formal recognition to the newly created state of Israel and the Kingdom of Transjordan. These two nations were inevitably linked in the President's mind as twin emergent states: one serving the needs of the refugee Jew, the other absorbing recently displaced Palestinian Arabs. In addition, Truman was aware of the private agreements that existed between Jewish Agency leaders and King Abdullah I of Jordan. Thus, it made perfect sense to Truman to favour both states with de jure recognition."[31]
Rifai asked when the United States was going to recognize the union of Arab Palestine and Jordan. Mr. Rockwell explained the Department's position, stating that it was not the custom of the United States to issue formal statements of recognition every time a foreign country changed its territorial area. The union of Arab Palestine and Jordan had been brought about as a result of the will of the people and the US accepted the fact that Jordanian sovereignty had been extended to the new area. Mr. Rifai said he had not realized this and that he was very pleased to learn that the US did in fact recognize the union.[32]
Jordan was admitted as a member state of the United Nations on 14 December 1955.
När tar ni någonsin offrets perspektiv?
