Max Täuben var en SS-Untersturmfuehrer, det vill säga, en löjtnant (mer korrekt sådan som i USA kallas för 2nd lieutenant). Han förde befäl över en pluton (underhåll-verkstad) på östfronten. Hans pluton var inte kopplad till en Einzatsgruppen men ägnade sig ändå åt att mörda judar, trots att de inte fått order om att delta i dödandet. Plutonen sköt hundratals judar och begravde dem. Före avrättningarna hade hans män slagit de dödsdömda med bla spadar. Till slut blev det för mycket.
www.ase.org.uk/htm/conferences/atsi/pdf/F3.pdf
Saken är den att Taubner hade tagit foton på plutonens ”aktiviteter” och skickat hem dem. Den 24 maj 1943 dömdes han på en rad punkter av en Oberstes SS- und Polizeigericht. Så här såg delar av anklagelsen ut:
www.shamash.org/holocaust/denial/nazi_doc.txt (med hänvisning till 'The Good Old Days' - E. Klee, W. Dressen, V. Riess, The Free Press,
NY, 1988, p, 196-207])
Intressant, eller hur!
www.ase.org.uk/htm/conferences/atsi/pdf/F3.pdf
Saken är den att Taubner hade tagit foton på plutonens ”aktiviteter” och skickat hem dem. Den 24 maj 1943 dömdes han på en rad punkter av en Oberstes SS- und Polizeigericht. Så här såg delar av anklagelsen ut:
Citat:
1. The accused shall not be punished because of the actions against
the Jews as such. The Jews have to be exterminated and none of the
Jews that were killed is any great loss. Although the accused should
have recognized that the extermination of the Jews was the duty of
Kommandos which were set up especially for this purpose, he should
be excused for considering himself to have the authority to take
part in the extermination of Jewry himself. Real hatred of the Jews
was the driving motivation for the accused. In the process he let
himself be drawn into committing cruel actions in Alexandriya which
are unworthy of a German man and an SS-officer. These excesses cannot
be justified, either, as the accused would like to, as retaliation
for the pain that the Jews have caused the German people. It is not
the German way to apply Bolshevic methods during the necessary
extermination of the worst enemy of our people. In so doing the
conduct of the accused gives rise to considerable concern. The
accused allowed his men to act with such vicious brutality that
they conducted themselves under his command like a savage horde...
2. By taking photographs of the incidents or having photographs
taken, by having these developed in photographic shops and showing
them to his wife and friends, the accused is guilty of disobedience.
Such pictures could pose the gravest risks to the security of the
Reich if they fell into the wrong hands...
the Jews as such. The Jews have to be exterminated and none of the
Jews that were killed is any great loss. Although the accused should
have recognized that the extermination of the Jews was the duty of
Kommandos which were set up especially for this purpose, he should
be excused for considering himself to have the authority to take
part in the extermination of Jewry himself. Real hatred of the Jews
was the driving motivation for the accused. In the process he let
himself be drawn into committing cruel actions in Alexandriya which
are unworthy of a German man and an SS-officer. These excesses cannot
be justified, either, as the accused would like to, as retaliation
for the pain that the Jews have caused the German people. It is not
the German way to apply Bolshevic methods during the necessary
extermination of the worst enemy of our people. In so doing the
conduct of the accused gives rise to considerable concern. The
accused allowed his men to act with such vicious brutality that
they conducted themselves under his command like a savage horde...
2. By taking photographs of the incidents or having photographs
taken, by having these developed in photographic shops and showing
them to his wife and friends, the accused is guilty of disobedience.
Such pictures could pose the gravest risks to the security of the
Reich if they fell into the wrong hands...
www.shamash.org/holocaust/denial/nazi_doc.txt (med hänvisning till 'The Good Old Days' - E. Klee, W. Dressen, V. Riess, The Free Press,
NY, 1988, p, 196-207])
Intressant, eller hur!
Fallet Max Taubner är som jag sade förut ändock ett synnerligen dubiöst halmstrå för de som förkunnar att "judarna Förintades". Grymheter och disciplinbrott bestraffades regelmässigt i andra världskrigets Tyskland, både inom Wehrmacht och SS - SS-domaren Konrad Morgen var en av de mest aktiva inom den sanitära verksamheten, som ledde till att vissa svin till lägerkommendanter rent av avrättades. Domen mot Taubner, om den nu är autentisk, betyder ingenting i det stora sammanhanget. Domens språk är, som Scott Smith säger i en tråd om frågan på RODOH, "puffed up language that has little meaning outside its context. But it can be made to sound suspect, which is why the Hoaxsters carry on about it."
- kanske du kan scanna in och posta "det som efterfrågas"?
: