Citat:
Garry Nolans inlgg.
"First, you are putting words in my mouth. I "quote-unquote" never said, "Nah looks fake to me". Don't put words in my mouth. If you want to be taken seriously, don't lie.
Second... I was given the original data. I looked at it. I realized it would take an enormous amount of effort to go back and recreate the trail of evidence. I put far more effort into this already than you know. You've spent what, 30 minutes looking at a tweet or two and then popping off?
If YOU think it's so important, go spend 40 years learning the tools of the trade, learn how science is really done, and then spend a year of your life doing the work. Until then, you are an amateur with an opinion. I won't even offer an opinion because I have said many times I would need to see all the data.
I have been explicit in not taking a position. I've just pointed to countermanding evidence. Just because I don't just jump to YOUR conclusion doesn't mean I am accusing anyone of anything. I am just warning people to be very careful if they want to discern the truth here.
They didn't do what was needed to verify to a standard of science. There are now at least 2 explicit videos explaining how these things could have been faked (note I used the word "could". The DNA evidence of "nothing we've seen before" is a nothing burger given all the ways that DNA reads can be messed up.
You have zero comprehension of what it takes to do real work. You want instant answers. People like you do this field an extraordinary disservice. The reason "real scientists" won't touch this stuff with padded gloves is completely evident in your lack of critical thinking skills. Of course, that's just an opinion, but I don't need peer review to come to that conclusion at least."
"First, you are putting words in my mouth. I "quote-unquote" never said, "Nah looks fake to me". Don't put words in my mouth. If you want to be taken seriously, don't lie.
Second... I was given the original data. I looked at it. I realized it would take an enormous amount of effort to go back and recreate the trail of evidence. I put far more effort into this already than you know. You've spent what, 30 minutes looking at a tweet or two and then popping off?
If YOU think it's so important, go spend 40 years learning the tools of the trade, learn how science is really done, and then spend a year of your life doing the work. Until then, you are an amateur with an opinion. I won't even offer an opinion because I have said many times I would need to see all the data.
I have been explicit in not taking a position. I've just pointed to countermanding evidence. Just because I don't just jump to YOUR conclusion doesn't mean I am accusing anyone of anything. I am just warning people to be very careful if they want to discern the truth here.
They didn't do what was needed to verify to a standard of science. There are now at least 2 explicit videos explaining how these things could have been faked (note I used the word "could". The DNA evidence of "nothing we've seen before" is a nothing burger given all the ways that DNA reads can be messed up.
You have zero comprehension of what it takes to do real work. You want instant answers. People like you do this field an extraordinary disservice. The reason "real scientists" won't touch this stuff with padded gloves is completely evident in your lack of critical thinking skills. Of course, that's just an opinion, but I don't need peer review to come to that conclusion at least."
Han verkar lite irriterad.
Han har helt rtt. Det r ett ofog att folk har s brtt att hoppa till nn slutsats kring enstaka fall. Det gller inte bara "skeptikerna" heller, ven om de har en starkare tendens d de lst sig vid ett specifikt antagande i varje fall.
Men det r besvrligt med sna hr fall. Man vet ju inte skert hur serist det sktts d man inte har ngon trovrdig bedmare man kan lita p d mnet behandlas s styvmoderligt.
__________________
Senast redigerad av SnakePlisssken 2023-09-14 kl. 16:15.
Senast redigerad av SnakePlisssken 2023-09-14 kl. 16:15.
Skapa ett konto eller logga in för att kommentera
Du måste vara medlem för att kunna kommentera
