Säker på det?
Magmedicinen som gjorde ASTRA rik har i kopia hur många namn som helst. Torde vara samma med denna medicin: När patentet gått ut så är det fritt fram att kopiera, men namnet ägs fortfarande av den ursprunglige ägaren
Magmedicinen som gjorde ASTRA rik har i kopia hur många namn som helst. Torde vara samma med denna medicin: När patentet gått ut så är det fritt fram att kopiera, men namnet ägs fortfarande av den ursprunglige ägaren
Citat:
Du är en självgod nolla
A preprint promoted by a member of the UK Parliament for claiming to show that vitamin D led to an “80% reduction in need for ICU and a 60% reduction in deaths” has been removed from a server used by The Lancet family of journals.
The preprint, “Calcifediol Treatment and COVID-19-Related Outcomes,” was posted to Preprints with The Lancet on January 22. On February 13, David Davis, a Conservative member of UK’s Parliament, tweeted:
Lancet är inte alltid rätt källa.
Om du vill lära dig något får du använda dom kanaler som finns.
Titta du på klippet som dr Campbell postade på YT.
Vad för D vit halt ng/ml rekomenderar du?
A preprint promoted by a member of the UK Parliament for claiming to show that vitamin D led to an “80% reduction in need for ICU and a 60% reduction in deaths” has been removed from a server used by The Lancet family of journals.
The preprint, “Calcifediol Treatment and COVID-19-Related Outcomes,” was posted to Preprints with The Lancet on January 22. On February 13, David Davis, a Conservative member of UK’s Parliament, tweeted:
Lancet är inte alltid rätt källa.
Om du vill lära dig något får du använda dom kanaler som finns.
Titta du på klippet som dr Campbell postade på YT.
Vad för D vit halt ng/ml rekomenderar du?
select search filters
briefings
roundups & rapid reactions
before the headlines
fiona fox's blog
you are here: science media centre > roundups for journalists > expert reaction to preprint on calcifediol (vitamin d metabolite) treatment and covid-19-related outcomes, data from barcelona
FEBRUARY 15, 2021
expert reaction to preprint on calcifediol (vitamin D metabolite) treatment and COVID-19-related outcomes, data from Barcelona
A preprint, an unpublished non-peer reviewed study, looks at calcifediol treatment and COVID-19-related outcomes in Barcelona.
Prof Naveed Sattar, Professor of Metabolic Medicine, University of Glasgow, said:
“This is interesting but a huge dose of scepticism in the top line results is warranted as this is NOT a randomised controlled trial with no information on process of randomisation, and lack of placebo. It also does not appear to be registered as a trial. Also, baseline differences in more females in the vitamin D3 (calcifediol) group plus higher vitamin D levels, could easily confound the results. There is also no reason to relate vitamin D levels to outcomes as that is observational and tells us nothing new as we know vitamin D levels are lower in sicker patients – we have known this for decades in many conditions.
“In short, this is not a useful study as it falls well short of a well conducted randomised trial. Whilst many wish to believe Vitamin D is the cure to covid-19 or an exciting treatment, this ‘trial’ cannot allow any such inference. We must await robust randomised trials to form appropriate conclusions.”
Prof Adrian Martineau, Clinical Professor of Respiratory Infection and Immunity, Queen Mary University of London, said:
“This manuscript reports findings of a study designed to investigate effects of administering calcifediol (25-hydroxyvitamin D) on COVID-19 outcomes. Some dramatic positive findings are presented, but important methodological details are missing.
“First, it is not clear whether or how the randomisation was done. The abstract mentions randomisation – but Methods do not describe how it was done – they simply state that ‘551 received calcifediol at admission to the hospital and 379 were not treated (control group).’ Two features in particular suggest that there may have been issues with the randomisation:
a) intervention and control groups were not evenly balanced in size;
b) intervention and control groups were not evenly balanced with regard to key baseline characteristics (sex composition, baseline vitamin D levels).
“Second, 50 patients in the control group received the vitamin D metabolite calcifediol during ICU admission ‘at the discretion of the treating physicians and outside the original protocol’. This represents a pretty significant breach of the protocol, and calls into question the validity of the study’s results.
“Third, I could not find the registration for the trial. It is standard practice to register clinical trials before they start recruiting, and it’s not clear whether this was done.
“Overall, more methodological detail is needed before the claims of treatment benefit can be substantiated.”
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....ct_id=3771318#
All our previous output on this subject can be seen at this weblink:
www.sciencemediacentre.org/tag/covid-19
Declared interests
Prof Naveed Sattar: “No COI.”
Prof Adrian Martineau: “I am Chief Investigator of the CORONAVIT trial – the UK’s national clinical trial of vitamin D supplementation to reduce risk and/or severity of COVID-19. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04579640
I am the senior author on the meta-analysis by Jolliffe et al (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1....14.20152728v3), which demonstrates a modest protective effect of vitamin D supplements on acute respiratory infections other than COVID-19, and which is referenced in the updated NICE guideline.”
215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE
+44 (0)20 7611 8300
Terms and Conditions | Privacy Notice
follow us on twitter
read Fiona's blog
subscribe to feeds
With thanks to Wellcome Collection for use of their image library
Science Media Centre is a registered charity No. 1140827
and a company limited by guarantee, No. 7560997
Registered in England and Wales.
All worldwide rights reserved for all content on this site.
Copyright © Science Media Centre 2012
constructed on a molecular level by nodehosted by
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the ...
Necessary
Always Enabled
Non-Necessary
Sågas m fotknölarna.
Citat:
select search filters
briefings
roundups & rapid reactions
before the headlines
fiona fox's blog
you are here: science media centre > roundups for journalists > expert reaction to preprint on calcifediol (vitamin d metabolite) treatment and covid-19-related outcomes, data from barcelona
FEBRUARY 15, 2021
expert reaction to preprint on calcifediol (vitamin D metabolite) treatment and COVID-19-related outcomes, data from Barcelona
A preprint, an unpublished non-peer reviewed study, looks at calcifediol treatment and COVID-19-related outcomes in Barcelona.
Prof Naveed Sattar, Professor of Metabolic Medicine, University of Glasgow, said:
“This is interesting but a huge dose of scepticism in the top line results is warranted as this is NOT a randomised controlled trial with no information on process of randomisation, and lack of placebo. It also does not appear to be registered as a trial. Also, baseline differences in more females in the vitamin D3 (calcifediol) group plus higher vitamin D levels, could easily confound the results. There is also no reason to relate vitamin D levels to outcomes as that is observational and tells us nothing new as we know vitamin D levels are lower in sicker patients – we have known this for decades in many conditions.
“In short, this is not a useful study as it falls well short of a well conducted randomised trial. Whilst many wish to believe Vitamin D is the cure to covid-19 or an exciting treatment, this ‘trial’ cannot allow any such inference. We must await robust randomised trials to form appropriate conclusions.”
Prof Adrian Martineau, Clinical Professor of Respiratory Infection and Immunity, Queen Mary University of London, said:
“This manuscript reports findings of a study designed to investigate effects of administering calcifediol (25-hydroxyvitamin D) on COVID-19 outcomes. Some dramatic positive findings are presented, but important methodological details are missing.
“First, it is not clear whether or how the randomisation was done. The abstract mentions randomisation – but Methods do not describe how it was done – they simply state that ‘551 received calcifediol at admission to the hospital and 379 were not treated (control group).’ Two features in particular suggest that there may have been issues with the randomisation:
a) intervention and control groups were not evenly balanced in size;
b) intervention and control groups were not evenly balanced with regard to key baseline characteristics (sex composition, baseline vitamin D levels).
“Second, 50 patients in the control group received the vitamin D metabolite calcifediol during ICU admission ‘at the discretion of the treating physicians and outside the original protocol’. This represents a pretty significant breach of the protocol, and calls into question the validity of the study’s results.
“Third, I could not find the registration for the trial. It is standard practice to register clinical trials before they start recruiting, and it’s not clear whether this was done.
“Overall, more methodological detail is needed before the claims of treatment benefit can be substantiated.”
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....ct_id=3771318#
All our previous output on this subject can be seen at this weblink:
www.sciencemediacentre.org/tag/covid-19
Declared interests
Prof Naveed Sattar: “No COI.”
Prof Adrian Martineau: “I am Chief Investigator of the CORONAVIT trial – the UK’s national clinical trial of vitamin D supplementation to reduce risk and/or severity of COVID-19. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04579640
I am the senior author on the meta-analysis by Jolliffe et al (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1....14.20152728v3), which demonstrates a modest protective effect of vitamin D supplements on acute respiratory infections other than COVID-19, and which is referenced in the updated NICE guideline.”
215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE
+44 (0)20 7611 8300
Terms and Conditions | Privacy Notice
follow us on twitter
read Fiona's blog
subscribe to feeds
With thanks to Wellcome Collection for use of their image library
Science Media Centre is a registered charity No. 1140827
and a company limited by guarantee, No. 7560997
Registered in England and Wales.
All worldwide rights reserved for all content on this site.
Copyright © Science Media Centre 2012
constructed on a molecular level by nodehosted by
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the ...
Necessary
Always Enabled
Non-Necessary
Sågas m fotknölarna.
briefings
roundups & rapid reactions
before the headlines
fiona fox's blog
you are here: science media centre > roundups for journalists > expert reaction to preprint on calcifediol (vitamin d metabolite) treatment and covid-19-related outcomes, data from barcelona
FEBRUARY 15, 2021
expert reaction to preprint on calcifediol (vitamin D metabolite) treatment and COVID-19-related outcomes, data from Barcelona
A preprint, an unpublished non-peer reviewed study, looks at calcifediol treatment and COVID-19-related outcomes in Barcelona.
Prof Naveed Sattar, Professor of Metabolic Medicine, University of Glasgow, said:
“This is interesting but a huge dose of scepticism in the top line results is warranted as this is NOT a randomised controlled trial with no information on process of randomisation, and lack of placebo. It also does not appear to be registered as a trial. Also, baseline differences in more females in the vitamin D3 (calcifediol) group plus higher vitamin D levels, could easily confound the results. There is also no reason to relate vitamin D levels to outcomes as that is observational and tells us nothing new as we know vitamin D levels are lower in sicker patients – we have known this for decades in many conditions.
“In short, this is not a useful study as it falls well short of a well conducted randomised trial. Whilst many wish to believe Vitamin D is the cure to covid-19 or an exciting treatment, this ‘trial’ cannot allow any such inference. We must await robust randomised trials to form appropriate conclusions.”
Prof Adrian Martineau, Clinical Professor of Respiratory Infection and Immunity, Queen Mary University of London, said:
“This manuscript reports findings of a study designed to investigate effects of administering calcifediol (25-hydroxyvitamin D) on COVID-19 outcomes. Some dramatic positive findings are presented, but important methodological details are missing.
“First, it is not clear whether or how the randomisation was done. The abstract mentions randomisation – but Methods do not describe how it was done – they simply state that ‘551 received calcifediol at admission to the hospital and 379 were not treated (control group).’ Two features in particular suggest that there may have been issues with the randomisation:
a) intervention and control groups were not evenly balanced in size;
b) intervention and control groups were not evenly balanced with regard to key baseline characteristics (sex composition, baseline vitamin D levels).
“Second, 50 patients in the control group received the vitamin D metabolite calcifediol during ICU admission ‘at the discretion of the treating physicians and outside the original protocol’. This represents a pretty significant breach of the protocol, and calls into question the validity of the study’s results.
“Third, I could not find the registration for the trial. It is standard practice to register clinical trials before they start recruiting, and it’s not clear whether this was done.
“Overall, more methodological detail is needed before the claims of treatment benefit can be substantiated.”
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....ct_id=3771318#
All our previous output on this subject can be seen at this weblink:
www.sciencemediacentre.org/tag/covid-19
Declared interests
Prof Naveed Sattar: “No COI.”
Prof Adrian Martineau: “I am Chief Investigator of the CORONAVIT trial – the UK’s national clinical trial of vitamin D supplementation to reduce risk and/or severity of COVID-19. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04579640
I am the senior author on the meta-analysis by Jolliffe et al (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1....14.20152728v3), which demonstrates a modest protective effect of vitamin D supplements on acute respiratory infections other than COVID-19, and which is referenced in the updated NICE guideline.”
215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE
+44 (0)20 7611 8300
Terms and Conditions | Privacy Notice
follow us on twitter
read Fiona's blog
subscribe to feeds
With thanks to Wellcome Collection for use of their image library
Science Media Centre is a registered charity No. 1140827
and a company limited by guarantee, No. 7560997
Registered in England and Wales.
All worldwide rights reserved for all content on this site.
Copyright © Science Media Centre 2012
constructed on a molecular level by nodehosted by
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the ...
Necessary
Always Enabled
Non-Necessary
Sågas m fotknölarna.
Du inser alltså at din källa Lancet har publicerat
fallska artiklar skrivna för att missinformera lgodtrogna läkare.
A mysterious company's coronavirus papers in top medical journals may be unraveling
Scientists and journals express concern over influential studies of COVID-19 patient data that evaluated possible treatments such as hydroxychloroquine
2 JUN 2020.
1 av 100 tals studier om d vitamin covid
på pub med
COVID-19 Mortality Risk Correlates Inversely with Vitamin D3 Status, and a Mortality Rate Close to Zero Could Theoretically Be Achieved at 50 ng/mL 25(OH)D3: Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
__________________
Senast redigerad av rusellpeters 2021-12-26 kl. 19:25.
Senast redigerad av rusellpeters 2021-12-26 kl. 19:25.
Citat:
Du inser alltså at din källa Lancet har publicerat
fallska artiklar skrivna för att missinformera lgodtrogna läkare.
A mysterious company's coronavirus papers in top medical journals may be unraveling
Scientists and journals express concern over influential studies of COVID-19 patient data that evaluated possible treatments such as hydroxychloroquine
2 JUN 2020.
1 av 100 tals studier om d vitamin covid
på pub med
COVID-19 Mortality Risk Correlates Inversely with Vitamin D3 Status, and a Mortality Rate Close to Zero Could Theoretically Be Achieved at 50 ng/mL 25(OH)D3: Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
fallska artiklar skrivna för att missinformera lgodtrogna läkare.
A mysterious company's coronavirus papers in top medical journals may be unraveling
Scientists and journals express concern over influential studies of COVID-19 patient data that evaluated possible treatments such as hydroxychloroquine
2 JUN 2020.
1 av 100 tals studier om d vitamin covid
på pub med
COVID-19 Mortality Risk Correlates Inversely with Vitamin D3 Status, and a Mortality Rate Close to Zero Could Theoretically Be Achieved at 50 ng/mL 25(OH)D3: Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
När LANCET gör fel, så blir det rättelser.
D-vitamin biter inte på covid, inga stora kliniker behandlar med D-vitamin e.likn.
Det är foliehattsmedikamenter. Ingen vetenskaplig publikation värd namnet kommer sjunga dess lov.
Prata inte om data från hobbydoktorerna i FLCCC och BIRD. De är ivermectinkrämare, tull vilket pris som helst.
Det är vaccin och riktade antiviraler som stävjar denna pandemi. Och de som underhåller pandemin, det är inte vaccinering e.d. utan flertalet egoistiska idioter som inte vaccinerar sig. Nåja, det kommer inte nyanställas sådan personal i människovårdande yrken, skönt. En ovaccinerad lågbegåvad idiot ska inte vårda mina anhöriga.
Citat:
När LANCET gör fel, så blir det rättelser.
D-vitamin biter inte på covid, inga stora kliniker behandlar med D-vitamin e.likn.
Det är foliehattsmedikamenter. Ingen vetenskaplig publikation värd namnet kommer sjunga dess lov.
Prata inte om data från hobbydoktorerna i FLCCC och BIRD. De är ivermectinkrämare, tull vilket pris som helst.
Det är vaccin och riktade antiviraler som stävjar denna pandemi. Och de som underhåller pandemin, det är inte vaccinering e.d. utan flertalet egoistiska idioter som inte vaccinerar sig. Nåja, det kommer inte nyanställas sådan personal i människovårdande yrken, skönt. En ovaccinerad lågbegåvad idiot ska inte vårda mina anhöriga.
D-vitamin biter inte på covid, inga stora kliniker behandlar med D-vitamin e.likn.
Det är foliehattsmedikamenter. Ingen vetenskaplig publikation värd namnet kommer sjunga dess lov.
Prata inte om data från hobbydoktorerna i FLCCC och BIRD. De är ivermectinkrämare, tull vilket pris som helst.
Det är vaccin och riktade antiviraler som stävjar denna pandemi. Och de som underhåller pandemin, det är inte vaccinering e.d. utan flertalet egoistiska idioter som inte vaccinerar sig. Nåja, det kommer inte nyanställas sådan personal i människovårdande yrken, skönt. En ovaccinerad lågbegåvad idiot ska inte vårda mina anhöriga.
Folk som blir helt rabiata över något så glasklart son att bra D-vitaminnivåer klart hjälper hur man klarar Corona får mig att gå full konspirationsteoretiker. Får dom betalt? Har människan verkligen varit på månen? Finns det ödlemänniskor som skriver på Flashback?
Men seriöst, du tror den rekommenderade dagliga dosen D-vitamin är helt perfekt och skall inte överstigas?
Att man fattar att bra D-vitaminnivåer är bra behöver ju inte betyda att man är emot vaccin.
Citat:
Folk som blir helt rabiata över något så glasklart son att bra D-vitaminnivåer klart hjälper hur man klarar Corona får mig att gå full konspirationsteoretiker. Får dom betalt? Har människan verkligen varit på månen? Finns det ödlemänniskor som skriver på Flashback?
Men seriöst, du tror den rekommenderade dagliga dosen D-vitamin är helt perfekt och skall inte överstigas?
Att man fattar att bra D-vitaminnivåer är bra behöver ju inte betyda att man är emot vaccin.
Men seriöst, du tror den rekommenderade dagliga dosen D-vitamin är helt perfekt och skall inte överstigas?
Att man fattar att bra D-vitaminnivåer är bra behöver ju inte betyda att man är emot vaccin.
Avsaknad av D-vitamin-brust/insufficiens, minskar risken att insjukna i ffa luftvägsinfektioner generellt. Det är ingen behandling för covid-19. Lägg ner nu.
Citat:
När LANCET gör fel, så blir det rättelser.
D-vitamin biter inte på covid, inga stora kliniker behandlar med D-vitamin e.likn.
Det är foliehattsmedikamenter. Ingen vetenskaplig publikation värd namnet kommer sjunga dess lov.
Prata inte om data från hobbydoktorerna i FLCCC och BIRD. De är ivermectinkrämare, tull vilket pris som helst.
Det är vaccin och riktade antiviraler som stävjar denna pandemi. Och de som underhåller pandemin, det är inte vaccinering e.d. utan flertalet egoistiska idioter som inte vaccinerar sig. Nåja, det kommer inte nyanställas sådan personal i människovårdande yrken, skönt. En ovaccinerad lågbegåvad idiot ska inte vårda mina anhöriga.
D-vitamin biter inte på covid, inga stora kliniker behandlar med D-vitamin e.likn.
Det är foliehattsmedikamenter. Ingen vetenskaplig publikation värd namnet kommer sjunga dess lov.
Prata inte om data från hobbydoktorerna i FLCCC och BIRD. De är ivermectinkrämare, tull vilket pris som helst.
Det är vaccin och riktade antiviraler som stävjar denna pandemi. Och de som underhåller pandemin, det är inte vaccinering e.d. utan flertalet egoistiska idioter som inte vaccinerar sig. Nåja, det kommer inte nyanställas sådan personal i människovårdande yrken, skönt. En ovaccinerad lågbegåvad idiot ska inte vårda mina anhöriga.
Du borde göra som Lancet och komma med en rättelse.
Background: Evidence recommends that vitamin D might be a crucial supportive agent for the immune system, mainly in cytokine response regulation against COVID-19. Hence, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to maximise the use of everything that exists about the role of vitamin D in the COVID-19.
Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science up to December 18, 2020. Studies focused on the role of vitamin D in confirmed COVID-19 patients were entered into the systematic review.
Conclusion: This study found that most of the COVID-19 patients were suffering from vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency. Also, there is about three times higher chance of getting infected with SARS-CoV-2 among vitamin-D-deficient individuals and about five times higher probability of developing the severe disease in vitamin-D-deficient patients. Vitamin D deficiency showed no significant association with mortality rates in this population.
En av hundratals studier.
Vaccin är inte behandling mot Covid, ett visst skydd mot allvarlig sjukdom hos de med svagt immunsystem
D vitamin nivå 50 ng/ ml och motion minst 3 tim i veckan. God kost inte fet
är du bättre skyddad mot covid än en slö fet metabolic ohälsosam person med typ 2 diabetes.
Vaccin är bra för vissa men inte lösningen
Omicron smittan drivs av vaccinerade.
Vakna gör som Lancet.
Citat:
Du borde göra som Lancet och komma med en rättelse.
Background: Evidence recommends that vitamin D might be a crucial supportive agent for the immune system, mainly in cytokine response regulation against COVID-19. Hence, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to maximise the use of everything that exists about the role of vitamin D in the COVID-19.
Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science up to December 18, 2020. Studies focused on the role of vitamin D in confirmed COVID-19 patients were entered into the systematic review.
Conclusion: This study found that most of the COVID-19 patients were suffering from vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency. Also, there is about three times higher chance of getting infected with SARS-CoV-2 among vitamin-D-deficient individuals and about five times higher probability of developing the severe disease in vitamin-D-deficient patients. Vitamin D deficiency showed no significant association with mortality rates in this population.
En av hundratals studier.
Vaccin är inte behandling mot Covid, ett visst skydd mot allvarlig sjukdom hos de med svagt immunsystem
D vitamin nivå 50 ng/ ml och motion minst 3 tim i veckan. God kost inte fet
är du bättre skyddad mot covid än en slö fet metabolic ohälsosam person med typ 2 diabetes.
Vaccin är bra för vissa men inte lösningen
Omicron smittan drivs av vaccinerade.
Vakna gör som Lancet.
Background: Evidence recommends that vitamin D might be a crucial supportive agent for the immune system, mainly in cytokine response regulation against COVID-19. Hence, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to maximise the use of everything that exists about the role of vitamin D in the COVID-19.
Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science up to December 18, 2020. Studies focused on the role of vitamin D in confirmed COVID-19 patients were entered into the systematic review.
Conclusion: This study found that most of the COVID-19 patients were suffering from vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency. Also, there is about three times higher chance of getting infected with SARS-CoV-2 among vitamin-D-deficient individuals and about five times higher probability of developing the severe disease in vitamin-D-deficient patients. Vitamin D deficiency showed no significant association with mortality rates in this population.
En av hundratals studier.
Vaccin är inte behandling mot Covid, ett visst skydd mot allvarlig sjukdom hos de med svagt immunsystem
D vitamin nivå 50 ng/ ml och motion minst 3 tim i veckan. God kost inte fet
är du bättre skyddad mot covid än en slö fet metabolic ohälsosam person med typ 2 diabetes.
Vaccin är bra för vissa men inte lösningen
Omicron smittan drivs av vaccinerade.
Vakna gör som Lancet.
Vilka större välrenommerade sjukhus behandlar med vit-D på sina IVA-patienter? Inga sa du, stämmer det? Varför är det så? Antingen är alla sjukhusläkare idioter eller så är D-vitamin inte så jäkla fantastiskt. I Sverige i det nationella covid-19-vårdprogrammet (länkat till det flera ggr, gå in på wwww.infektion.net o kolla vårdprogram) rekommenderas inte vitamin-D-behandling. Är läkarna som sysslar med covid-vård idioter? Tror inte det.
Omikron drivs fram bl.a. av vaccin. Det är ingen som blir förvånad över det, det är en av anledningarna till att det är så fiffigt m mRNA-vaccinerna att man kan finjustera dem för att klara av nya SARS-Cov-2-varianter. Virus muterar. Det är inget misslyckande med covid-19-caccinerna, även om vaccinhatarna blir överlyckliga när de får fragment av sanniningen och bygger upp sin fantasivärld. På samma sätt är det med influensavirus. Men inte tycker experter som sysslar med den årliga infleunsaepidemin att vi ska sluta med influensavaccin.
Citat:
Vad menar du? Att mods på FB är kunniga inom medicin? Och vad vet du om ivermectin? Inser du att drogen har sålts receptfritt i mer än 60 år utan någon som helst koppling till medicinskador? Är det som du kallar värdelöst? Att gamla mediciner hittar nya användningsområden är varken nytt eller förvånande. Det finns medicin mot högt blodtryck som istället började användas till prostataförstoring. Eller värktabletter som nu används till blodförtunning. Du vet inte vad du pratar om.
Det har ju inte ens existerat i 60 år, så du har ju fel om det. Vad vet du om Ivermectin om du inte ens vet det? Du vet inte vad du pratar om.
Ny undersökning från Japan med ivermectin publicerad sista december.
The study was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant Number 19H03760 and 19H03761
Conclusions
Ivermectin improved gastrointestinal complications and the number of ventilator-free days in severe COVID-19 patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. Prevention of gastrointestinal symptoms by SARS-Cov-2 might be associated with COVID-19 outcome
https://www.jiac-j.com/article/S1341...360-3/fulltext
Då inväntar vi låtsasdoktorn och de andra "specialisterna" i denna tråd för avfärdande av denna undersökning.
The study was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant Number 19H03760 and 19H03761
Conclusions
Ivermectin improved gastrointestinal complications and the number of ventilator-free days in severe COVID-19 patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. Prevention of gastrointestinal symptoms by SARS-Cov-2 might be associated with COVID-19 outcome
https://www.jiac-j.com/article/S1341...360-3/fulltext
Då inväntar vi låtsasdoktorn och de andra "specialisterna" i denna tråd för avfärdande av denna undersökning.
Citat:
Ny undersökning från Japan med ivermectin publicerad sista december.
The study was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant Number 19H03760 and 19H03761
Conclusions
Ivermectin improved gastrointestinal complications and the number of ventilator-free days in severe COVID-19 patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. Prevention of gastrointestinal symptoms by SARS-Cov-2 might be associated with COVID-19 outcome
https://www.jiac-j.com/article/S1341...360-3/fulltext
Då inväntar vi låtsasdoktorn och de andra "specialisterna" i denna tråd för avfärdande av denna undersökning.
The study was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant Number 19H03760 and 19H03761
Conclusions
Ivermectin improved gastrointestinal complications and the number of ventilator-free days in severe COVID-19 patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. Prevention of gastrointestinal symptoms by SARS-Cov-2 might be associated with COVID-19 outcome
https://www.jiac-j.com/article/S1341...360-3/fulltext
Då inväntar vi låtsasdoktorn och de andra "specialisterna" i denna tråd för avfärdande av denna undersökning.
This article has 1,995 Twitter interactions across 8 URLs.
It has received 262 tweets and 1,733 retweets.
Låt inte forskarkolleger godkänna artikeln när experterna på twitter sagt sitt.
Skapa ett konto eller logga in för att kommentera
Du måste vara medlem för att kunna kommentera
