Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
korrektamund0
Återigen en antivaxxare som klipper mitt i meningar och sliter påståenden rakt ur kontexten.
Men snälla, det är ju inte det han säger. Han säger
Så frågan är då VAR är datat som styrker dessa uppgifter, och vilka grupper rör det sig om?
”A total of 566 patients,
aged 28 to 97,
M:F ratio 1:1
seen in a preventive cardiology practice
had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot
and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot.
Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac;
sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac;
HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac.
These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk.
At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.
We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle
and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.”
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712