Obstruction of justice, begången för att presidenten är
livrädd för utredandet av hans affärer med ryska intressen och agenter, och hur dessa inverkat på valet:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/04/us/politics/trump-sessions-russia-mcgahn.html
Citat:
Obstruction Inquiry Shows Trump’s Struggle to Keep Grip on Russia Investigation
President Trump gave firm instructions in March to the White House’s top lawyer: stop the attorney general, Jeff Sessions, from recusing himself in the Justice Department’s investigation into whether Mr. Trump’s associates had helped a Russian campaign to disrupt the 2016 election.
Hela. Artikeln. Är. Fantastisk.

Jag skulle inte kalla den rekommenderad läsning;
jag skulle säga att den är obligatorisk!
Citat:
After that hearing, Mr. Trump began to discuss openly with White House officials his desire to fire Mr. Comey. This unnerved some inside the White House counsel’s office, and even led one of Mr. McGahn’s deputies to mislead the president about his authority to fire the F.B.I. director.
The lawyer, Uttam Dhillon, was convinced that if Mr. Comey was fired, the Trump presidency could be imperiled, because it would force the Justice Department to open an investigation into whether Mr. Trump was trying to derail the Russia investigation.
Longstanding analysis of presidential power says that the president, as the head of the executive branch, does not need grounds to fire the F.B.I. director. Mr. Dhillon, a veteran Justice Department lawyer before joining the Trump White House, assigned a junior lawyer to examine this issue. That lawyer determined that the F.B.I. director was no different than any other employee in the executive branch, and that there was nothing prohibiting the president from firing him.
But Mr. Dhillon, who had earlier told Mr. Trump that he needed cause to fire Mr. Comey, never corrected the record, withholding the conclusions of his research.
Stephen I. Vladeck, a law professor at the University of Texas School of Law, called the incident “extraordinary,” adding that he could not think of a similar one that occurred in past administrations.
“This shows that the president’s lawyers don’t trust giving him all the facts because they fear he will make a decision that is not best suited for him,” Mr. Vladeck said.
The attempts to stop Mr. Trump from firing Mr. Comey were successful until May 3, when the F.B.I. director once again testified on Capitol Hill. He spent much of the time describing a series of decisions he had made during the bureau’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s personal email account.
Citat:
Two days after Mr. Comey’s testimony, an aide to Mr. Sessions approached a Capitol Hill staff member asking whether the staffer had any derogatory information about the F.B.I. director. The attorney general wanted one negative article a day in the news media about Mr. Comey, according to a person with knowledge of the meeting.
Citat:
Mr. Trump spent the next weekend at his country club in Bedminster, N.J., where he watched a recording of Mr. Comey’s testimony, stewed about the F.B.I. director and discussed the possibility of dismissing him with his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and his senior policy adviser, Stephen Miller. He had decided he would fire Mr. Comey, and asked Mr. Miller to help put together a letter the president intended to send to Mr. Comey.
In interviews with The Times, White House officials have said the letter contained no references to Russia or the F.B.I.’s investigation. According to two people who have read it, however, the letter’s first sentence said the Russia investigation had been “fabricated and politically motivated.”
On Monday, May 8, Mr. Trump met with Mr. Sessions and Mr. Rosenstein to discuss firing Mr. Comey, and Mr. Rosenstein agreed to write his own memo outlining why Mr. Comey should be fired. Before writing it, he took a copy of the letter that Mr. Trump and Mr. Miller had drafted during the weekend in Bedminster.
Citat:
Donald F. McGahn II, carried out the president’s orders and lobbied Mr. Sessions to remain in charge of the inquiry, according to two people with knowledge of the episode. Mr. McGahn was unsuccessful, and the president erupted in anger in front of numerous White House officials, saying he needed his attorney general to protect him.
...varför behöver gubben
landets högste åklagare som barnvakt för att "skydda honom"?
Och från vad?
Innan de gamla vanliga
"fake news!!!!"-mupparna sätter igång att tjuta som stuckna grisar i tråden;
AP bekräftar:
https://twitter.com/AP_Politics/status/949107525026304001
Citat:
BREAKING: AP source: Trump had top White House lawyer urge Attorney General Jeff Sessions to not recuse himself from Russia investigation
https://apnews.com/91d848f2f7764268a921def62d411d16
...jag börjar faktiskt undra
hur mycket sparad dokumentation över samtal och gångna händelser vita husets personal har, eftersom hela den här affären är dömd att till slut explodera i ansiktet på dem och
de vet att den högst ansvarigt skyldige är en vanelögnare som kommer göra
allt vad han kan för att försöka skulden lägga på precis vem annan som helst?
Donald har bara två huvudsakliga driftsinstinkter: Att få vara i rampljusets centrum och att
allting är någon annans fel!
The Stupid Watergate...