Eric Hunt har ändrat sig - tror numer på Förintelsen

Through the years, I have asked several prominent “Revisionists” this question. The most common response is “I don’t know.”

Does this answer sound like it would win a public debate let alone get laughed out of an auditorium? Instead it is undoubtedly a losing position. And this is precisely why Revisionists have not and are, without additional miraculous, earth-shattering new data, unable to ever “win” the “Holocaust denial” debate.

I have read most of what has been written in regards to this central question. The Revisionist answer is the equivalent of “I don’t know” along with some insinuations that some transports we know were indeed sent to the “Russian East” (mostly Minsk, Belarus and the Baltic states) must have been first transited through these camps. This weak and really nonexistent data is not good enough. Often some of these claimed transports to the “Russian East” through Sobibor, Treblinka, etc., happened before the extermination camps claimed “transit camps” were even open, therefore are impossible to have occurred via the “transit camps.”

The hard truth, why no scholars of any value, or the typical general public will even try to consider Revisionist claims, are the undeniable facts about what happened. At Auschwitz in particular, Jews were torn apart from their family members. Children, their parents, the elderly, those unable to be of primary use to the Nazi war effort were never seen again. If Revisionists can’t tell what happened to these small children and elderly, rather than meet their end in the gas chambers they were last seen and photographed being forced into, they’re finished.

If Revisionists want to continue in “the movement” they must focus resources on coming up with an answer to the central question which could win a debate. Hard data on where those approximately two million Jews unable to work and alleged shoved in gas chambers were instead sent, rather than the cremation pits outside the gas chambers. I have concluded this information does not exist, because these Jews were killed.

The really good factual work I did, debunking of Steven Spielberg’s Oscar Winning liewitness Irene Zisblatt, or the use of the British bombed Nordhausen camp as Holocaust propaganda, has been attached to falsehoods of N.S. mass murder denial I now disavow. The work as a whole has been tainted. I ask that copies of my old videos, recordings, or writings be deleted, as it is misleading, especially to young people. In the future I may curate my past stuff into a new form I stand behind 100% today.

To be clear, the Holocaust industry has told Big Lies. They are using these lies to enable their agendas. Germans, Palestinians, Europeans, and others are paying the price of this weaponized guilt propaganda. Even Americans like myself, whose grandfather served in the liberation of France, are forced to submit to what has become one sided Jewish supremacist white-guilt propaganda. Elie Wiesel’s march to the edge of a flaming pit of fire where babies were dumped via dump trucks is a total fabrication. Schoolchildren are brainwashed to accept this illogical fantasy fiction as reality. Irene Zisblatt’s lies about pooping diamonds for a year and a half, escaping from inside an Auschwitz gas chamber and being thrown 150 feet over barbed wire, naked onto a train, being selected to become a lampshade, and others in Steven Spielberg’s Oscar winning documentary “The Last Days” will go down in history as a high water mark for the extreme gullibility of the public, the power of the Holocaust promotion industry, and the fraudulent journalist profession to refuse to expose it. I’m proud to have taken a stand and helped expose these lies which mock real suffering and sacrifice and are used for sinister ends.

It's not much of an exaggeration to say that Hunt's five documentary videos, produced between May 2011 and May 2016, have done more to keep Holocaust denial alive this decade than the entire output of Mattogno, Graf and Kues. Along with 'denierbud's documentaries, produced between 2006 and 2012, Hunt's videos have been touted across what we'd now call the alt-right blogosphere and uploaded by dozens of different 'revisionist', alt-right and conspiracist groups onto their websites or YouTube channels, as the ADL was forced to note back in 2014. If you had asked me on January 20 who the leading Holocaust revisionist activists were, then I'd have unhesitatingly put Eric Hunt in the top ten.

A San Francisco jury found a troubled New Jersey man guilty of a felony hate crime charge of false imprisonment on Monday while clearing him of five other felonies stemming from a bizarre encounter in which he pulled Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel out of a hotel elevator last year.

Eric Hunt, 24, had been charged with six felonies related to the Feb. 1, 2007, incident at the Argent Hotel that prosecutors had said was a hate-based attempt to persuade the peace activist to renounce the Holocaust.

The Nobel laureate testified during the trial about how Hunt rode up an elevator with him and yanked him out on the sixth floor, insisting that he had to interview him. Once outside the elevator, Wiesel said, he called for help and Hunt froze before eventually walking off.

One juror said outside court that the six counts amounted to "piling on." The panel found Hunt guilty of what appeared to be misdemeanor false imprisonment but was increased to a felony by virtue of a hate crime enhancement.

The jury found Hunt guilty of two other felony offenses, but the counts were cut to misdemeanor battery and misdemeanor elder abuse after the jury rejected hate crime enhancements for them.

Hunt shook and appeared to be moved to tears as the jury cleared him of the most serious felony allegation, attempted kidnapping.

The false imprisonment felony count carries a maximum three-year sentence. Because Hunt has been in custody for 18 months, accumulating good-conduct credits, he will probably be freed after sentencing next month, his attorney, John Runfola, said.

First he attacked Nobel Prize-winning author Elie Wiesel in an elevator, and now famed Holocaust denier Eric Hunt is on the attack again, filing a lawsuit in Broward against Steven Speilberg and author Irene Weisberg Zisblatt.

Hunt, 25, who was convicted last year in the attack on Wiesel in San Francisco in 2007, claims Zisblatt's new book "The Fifth Diamond: The Story of Irene Weisberg Zisblatt" is a fraud, according to the Sun-Sentinel.

The lawsuit, filed on Oct. 6 in Broward Circuit Court, alleges that "Zisblatt blatantly stole other Jewish people's experiences during World War II and passed them off as her own in order to further the Jewish political agenda and profit off of these fantastical tales."

I ask that copies of my old videos, recordings, or writings be deleted, as it is misleading, especially to young people.

To be clear, the Holocaust industry has told Big Lies. They are using these lies to enable their agendas. Germans, Palestinians, Europeans, and others are paying the price of this weaponized guilt propaganda. Even Americans like myself, whose grandfather served in the liberation of France, are forced to submit to what has become one sided Jewish supremacist white-guilt propaganda.

Hard data on where those approximately two million Jews unable to work and alleged shoved in gas chambers were instead sent, rather than the cremation pits outside the gas chambers. I have concluded this information does not exist, because these Jews were killed.

In the future I may curate my past stuff into a new form I stand behind 100% today

Debate Challenge
I accept to appear on any internet radio debate with any major published Revisionist with any internet radio show moderator.
Proposed moderator is The Ryan Dawson show, which has had on several Revisionists and would be a fair moderator.
Dawson's email is rydawson1@gmail.com, his skype is rys2sense , contact him or me to set up a date and time.

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Donate
Help fund my independent research, content production, and activism.
With your help, I hope to continue to expose politically incorrect truth in a much bigger way than ever before.
I can accept donations through the following methods -[...]

Pressac published his conclusions along with much of the underlying evidence in his 1989 book, Auschwitz: Technique and operation of the gas chambers by Beate Klarsfeld Foundation of New-York with translation from the French by Peter Moss.[1]
In his 1993 Les Crématoires d'Auschwitz,[7] he further delineated the operation of the crematoria at Auschwitz, and their integration into the larger Nazi program to eradicate the Jews of Europe. Pressac estimated that between 631,000 and 711,000 were killed at Auschwitz.[8]

What is the Pressac book? Pressac is a former Revisionist. He's convinced that the gas chambers did actually exist. And he's not discovering anything new in this. Absolutely nothing. He opens the door of the gas chamber. Everybody knew they were there. — Claude Lanzmann (in) Explaining Hitler by Ron Rosenbaum [12]

[...]And so, even though his writings are scientifically suspect, Pressac was without doubt the most politically successful revisionist to date. He was in fact our double agent.
Many thanks, Jean-Claude!

I ask that copies of my old videos, recordings, or writings be deleted, as it is misleading, especially to young people.

elcid123
archive.org Member

- usually what is deliberately concealed is of a salacious or titillating nature, thus there are often huge elements of shock and surprise when the truth comes out, somewhat akin to the commotion raised by a frightened cat suddenly loosed from the bag that had imprisoned it. Or it could have to do with a similarity between the behavior of both secrets and cats — once either is let out, they go wherever they want. (In other words, private news that has been made public spreads far and wide, despite all efforts to keep it contained to a small circle of confidantes or even to silence it altogether.)

"Och likväl rör hon sig"

Debate with Friedrich Paul Berg

http://www.ancreport.com/podcast/hol...vs-fritz-berg/

Fritz got totally rocked in the “debate.” I can’t really call what he did debate – he had to throw at least 50 “childish” insults one after the other. I stuck to the evidence, his entire lack of evidence proving the “Transit camp” theory and his own very illogical claims.

Highlights :

Fritz : Auschwitz was ” a gay old time.” Dr. Mengele “wonderful.”

In the debate you’ll hear exactly why Germar Rudolf, head of Committee for “Open Debate” on the Holocaust begged Fritz not to debate me. The outrageously emotional and insulting words come from Fritz. The logic and evidence I use shatter the denial of gassing and mass shooting by bullets. There is zero evidence to prove the Revisionist “transit camp” theory. “Deniers” know this and retreat to using stock phrases in their comfort zone.

Highlights:

On where did the approximately 750,000 Jews sent to Treblinka, supposedly sent Eastwards (but actually gassed) go?
Fritz : “I don’t know, I don’t care.”

Also
Fritz : Auschwitz was a “gay old time.”
Fritz : Dr. Mengele was “wonderful.”

Fritz often repeats that no autopsies have proven victims to be gassed. I point out a Polish archaeological investigation which showed intact skulls found at Treblinka cremation pits not pierced by bullets. I also point out the illogical concept that the large amount of bone fragments and cremated remains found at the site could prove cause of death due to exposure to engine exhaust when the cremation fire would release many of the same chemicals, especially if liquid fuel was used as an accelerant. When confronted with that logic, Fritz said, “I’m not an expert.” He later referenced watching CSI.

The investigations carried out by the Poles at Treblinka immediately after the war was a ludicrous half-baked affair, carried out by a judge, no less. You don’t put a judge in charge of a ground search and forensic examination at a crime scene. This work is done by properly qualified independent personnel, and then they submit their findings to a court of law, where only then does the judge become involved, and he assesses all the evidence presented before him before coming to a legal conclusion.

And the ground search at Treblinka was not carried out methodically, let alone thoroughly. There is no detailed report that could satisfy anyone that 850,000 human remains were buried or scattered there. The good judge claimed that parts of human bones and skulls were discovered, and even unburned rotted flesh and tissue. But then, one has to ask – what did they do with these human remains. The report doesn’t say what happened next, it just says that it came on to rain and the work was abandoned. And so we are left in the dark as to whether these alleged remains were left lying on the surface; collected and transferred elsewhere; or just covered over with earth. .

The situation gets worse, because Wikipedia states the following about what happened at Treblinka after the war;-

” The new Soviet-installed [Polish}government did not preserve evidence of the camp. The scene was not legally protected at the conclusion of World War II. ”

Absolutely amazing! – the Polish authorities didn’t even bother to protect the site either physically or legally for many years after the conclusion of WW2. They claim that it is vast cemetery containing the remains of nearly one million human souls, but just left the place untended for anyone to come and go, and do whatever they wanted there.

Wikipedia goes on to claim that;-

” In September 1947, 30 students from the local school, led by their teacher Feliks Szturo and priest Józef Ruciński, collected larger bones and skull fragments into farmers’ wicker baskets and buried them in a single mound. ”

But once again this is a ludicrous story. If there were human remains to be collected, then it would done by officially organised adult teams – and not by school children led by an unqualified teacher and priest. And of course, the big question is;- where is this mound of human remains today? Because there is no mound that exists anywhere on the site of Treblinka II.

To be clear, the Holocaust industry has told Big Lies. They are using these lies to enable their agendas. Germans, Palestinians, Europeans, and others are paying the price of this weaponized guilt propaganda. Even Americans like myself, whose grandfather served in the liberation of France, are forced to submit to what has become one sided Jewish supremacist white-guilt propaganda. Elie Wiesel’s march to the edge of a flaming pit of fire where babies were dumped via dump trucks is a total fabrication. Schoolchildren are brainwashed to accept this illogical fantasy fiction as reality. Irene Zisblatt’s lies about pooping diamonds for a year and a half, escaping from inside an Auschwitz gas chamber and being thrown 150 feet over barbed wire, naked onto a train, being selected to become a lampshade, and others in Steven Spielberg’s Oscar winning documentary “The Last Days” will go down in history as a high water mark for the extreme gullibility of the public, the power of the Holocaust promotion industry, and the fraudulent journalist profession to refuse to expose it. I’m proud to have taken a stand and helped expose these lies which mock real suffering and sacrifice and are used for sinister ends.