Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av deyy
Jag vet inte om AM-2201 ger utslag på urinprov. Men om rökmixen blev beslagtagen och dom hittade JWH-018 så beror det inte på AM-2201.
Skulle vara intressant att veta vart du har köpt rökmixen.
Citat:
"As far as I can tell, the metabolism of this would likely mirror JWH-018, ending with a nearly identical metabolite.
First, the biggest difference between these two molecules is the existence of the fluoropentyl indole side-chain (in AM-2201, which is absent in JWH-018). This is the first site of cleavage in napthoylindole metabolism, at least it seems to be the major trend in human metabolism. The molecular weight difference between these two molecules is entirely the result of the flourine atom, which will be removed with the rest of the pentyl side-chain (this, of course, is the site of debate for potential fluorotoxicity of fluoropentyl-indoles).
After this, the metabolic route continues to attack the indole ring, resulting in the detectable (via GC/MS or LC/MS-MS) indole-n-dealkyl metabolite, which as far as I can tell should look basically identical in either of the aforementioned methods.
Metabolic hydroxylation also occurs, but the metabolites of this route seem less extensive and are almost entirely conjugated with glucuronide.
READ: JWH-018 and AM-2201 will likely appear identical on basic laboratory drug-testing.
Read more: http://www.drugs-forum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=144184#ixzz1pU0N9LGU"
Det var inte jag som fick mixen tagen, det var en polare, och det kan mycket möjligt vara så att han blandade ihop skit och det var hans urin/blodprov som visade på JWH-018.
Är lite fuzzy på detaljerna, tyvärr.
Håller på infon om var mixen är köpt då jag inte tänker "smutskasta" en butik utan att vara säker.
