Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av Multikulturisten
Var någonstans, i allt det du länkat, står det att dessa judar inte ville ha invandring till Israel?
Det var detta jag efterfrågade, inte massas konspiratoriskt dravel.
Hehe, oväntad respons.

På vilket sätt verkar Israels styrande politiker - som dessa organisationer och individer uttalat, helhjärtat och förbehållslöst stödjer - för invandring och kulturberikning i Israel? Sen när innebär sionism att Israel ska vara mångkulturellt, välkomnande och tolerant för icke-judar? Är Israel det? Har dessa för Västs vidkommande multikultivurmande organisationer och individer, som uttryckligen sätter judiska och israeliska intressen framför allt annat, någonsin förespråkat en ens i närheten liknande invandringspolitik för Israel? Har du ens läst denna tråds rubrik? Är du jude eller bara sällsynt obildad och korkad?
Angående judisk-sionistiska neocons och dubbelmoral skriver de amerikanska statsvetarprofessorerna Mearsheimer och Walt i boken
The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy:
http://mearsheimer-walt-the-israel-lobby.blogspot.com/2008/06/mearsheimer-walt-israel-lobby-and-us_4764.html
Citat:
The problem is even more pronounced in the second Bush administration, whose ranks have included staunchly pro-Israel neoconservatives like Elliott Abrams, John Bolton, Douglas Feith, Aaron Friedberg, John Hannah, I. Lewis Libby, William Luti, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, and David Wurmser. As we shall see in Part II, these officials consistently pushed for policies favored by Israel and backed by key organizations in the lobby.
[...]
A few years later, in 2001, when Bruce Riedel left his position handling Middle East issues on the National Security Council, the New Republic reported that the Pentagon had "held up the appointment of Riedel's designated successor, the Middle East expert Alina Romanowski, whom Pentagon officials suspect of being insufficiently supportive of the Jewish state."71 The person appointed instead was Elliott Abrams, who had previously pleaded guilty to withholding information from Congress during the Iran-contra affair. Abrams is hardly objective about Israel, having previously written in a 1997 book that "there can be no doubt that Jews, faithful to the covenant between God and Abraham, are to stand apart from the nation in which they live. It is the very nature of being Jewish to be apart—except in Israel—from the rest of the population."72 This is a remarkable comment coming from an individual who holds a critically important position on Middle East policy in the U.S. government. "For the government of Israel," wrote Nathan Gutt-man in Ha'aretz, his appointment was "a gift from heaven."73
Trodde du att AJC, vars verksamhets fokusområden är "mångfald" och "Israel" som refererades till i mitt föregående inlägg, har haft något att anmärka på t.ex. nedanstående radikalnationalistiska attityder bland israeliska ledare?
Citat:
In early 2007, Benjamin Netanyahu apologized to ultra-Orthodox Israelis with large families for the hardships that were caused by welfare cuts that he had made in 2002 when he was finance minister. He noted, however, that there was at least one important and unexpected benefit of these cuts: "there was a dramatic drop in the birth rate" within the "non-Jewish public."45 For Netanyahu, like many Israelis who are deeply worried about the so-called Arab demographic threat, the fewer Israeli Arab births, the better.
Netanyahu's comments would almost certainly be condemned if made in the United States. Imagine the outcry that would arise here if a U.S. cabinet official spoke of the benefits of a policy that had reduced the birthrates of African Americans and Hispanics, thereby preserving a white majority. But such statements are not unusual in Israel, where important leaders have a history of making derogatory comments about Palestinians and are rarely sanctioned for them. Menachem Begin once said that "Palestinians are beasts walking on two legs," while former IDF Chief of Staff Rafael Eitan referred to them as "drugged roaches in a bottle" and also said that "a good Arab is a dead Arab." Another former chief of staff, Moshe Ya'alon, referred to the Palestinian threat as like a "cancer" on which he was performing "chemotherapy. "46
[...]
These hostile attitudes toward Israeli Arabs, coupled with fears about a "demographic threat" and the desire to maintain a Jewish majority, have led to considerable support among Israeli Jews for expelling or "transferring" much of the Arab population from Israel. Indeed, Avigdor Lieberman, who was appointed deputy prime minister for strategic threats in 2006, has made it clear that he favors expulsion, so as to make Israel "as much as possible" a homogeneous Jewish state. Specifically, he advocates trading portions of Israel that are densely packed with Arabs for areas of the West Bank that contain Jewish settlers. He is not the first Israeli cabinet minister to advocate expulsion.48
Although he is a controversial figure, Lieberman is not an outlier in Israel on this issue. The Israel Democracy Institute reported in May 2003 that 57 percent of Israel's Jews "think that the Arabs should be encouraged to emigrate." A 2004 survey conducted by Haifa University's Center for the Study of National Security found that the number had increased to 63.7 percent. One year later, in 2005, the Palestinian Center for Israel Studies found that 42 percent of Israeli Jews believed that their government should encourage Israeli Arabs to leave, while another 17 percent tended to agree with the idea. The following year, the Center for Combating Racism found that 40 percent of Israel's Jews wanted their leaders to encourage the Arab population to emigrate, while the Israel Democracy Institute found the number to be 62 percent.49 If 40 percent or more of white Americans declared that blacks, Hispanics, and Asians "should be encouraged" to leave the United States, it would surely prompt vehement criticism.
Med tanke på judendomens unikt etnocentriska karaktär och hur det format mentaliteten hos judiska statslösa minoriteter i diasporan, och med tanke på judarnas historiska erfarenheter, är det egentligen inget konstigt med att så många judar har en så aggressivt och chauvinistiskt etnonationalistisk inställning till sin relativt nybildade nationalstat samtidigt som samma personer och organisationer har ett intresse av öppenhet, "mångfald" och fri invandring när det gäller resten av världen. För skulle judarna behöva fly sitt land i Mellanöstern till följd av Israels alltmer impopulära agerande och de etniska konflikter som alltid uppstått i den judiska historien, så vill de förstås bli välkomnade som främlingar i värdlandet. Israels politiska yttringar är en naturlig konsekvens av judendomens patologiska karaktär manifesterad som en nationalstat.
Slutligen har vi en tråd om en judisk lobbyist som förklarar läget och ger de "konspiratoriska" "antisemiterna" rätt (OBS! obligatorisk läsning):
https://www.flashback.org/t1693406
Om detta av någon anledning inte duger åt dig, hur vore det att googla själv och läsa på om dessa individer och organisationer så att du kan bidra med något av substans? Lycka till...