2005-06-15, 13:54
#88
Rekommenderad läsning för den vetgirige och orädde kättaren(!!):
För den som verkligen är intresserad av att ta reda på hur revisionistisk forskning går till, rekommenderar jag att läsa Jürgen Graf's "The Giant With Feet of Clay" som på drygt 130 sidor - som väl inte kan anses som alltför betungande även för den som inte gillar tjocka böcker - analyserar Raul Hilberg's stora studie; "The Destruction of the European Jews", och som jag själv, p g a ett ovanligt ilsket åskväder med uteblivet Internet som följd 
, i lugn och ro kunde plöja igenom. Lugnt och sakligt går Graf igenom Hilberg's påståenden som vederläggs ett efter ett på ett lättfattligt sätt. Och några kopplingar till nazism kan man knappast skönja i denna briljanta "undersökande journalistik" om man kan kalla det så. Boken finns som pdf-fil för gratis nerladdning hos vho och jag citerar här lite från det inledande kapitlet:
http://vho.org/dl/ENG/Giant.pdf
, i lugn och ro kunde plöja igenom. Lugnt och sakligt går Graf igenom Hilberg's påståenden som vederläggs ett efter ett på ett lättfattligt sätt. Och några kopplingar till nazism kan man knappast skönja i denna briljanta "undersökande journalistik" om man kan kalla det så. Boken finns som pdf-fil för gratis nerladdning hos vho och jag citerar här lite från det inledande kapitlet:http://vho.org/dl/ENG/Giant.pdf
Citat:
"---That Hilberg's work is the result of an immense and devoted labor is recognized even by Revisionists, those who dispute the current version of the fate of the Jews in the Third Reich. For the Frenchman Prof. Robert Faurisson, one of the most prominent Revisionists, Hilberg stands "high above Poliakov, Wellers, Klarsfeld and others like them."3 Because of Hilberg's dominant position in orthodox 'Holocaust' literature the Revisionists
have had to confront his work again and again. The first such confrontation was in 1964, three years after the appearance of the first edition of The Destruction of the European Jews. At that time, the Frenchman Paul
Rassinier, a former Resistance fighter, ex-prisoner of the NS concentration camps Buchenwald and Dora, and the founder of Revisionism, made a full attack on Hilberg. In his book Le Drame des Juifs Européens, Rassinier
made a thorough study of Hilberg's statistics on Jewish population losses during the Second World War. He rejected the latter's conclusion that the number of Jewish victims should be set at 5.1 million; he said Hilberg could only have arrived at this number by a gross manipulation of his data. According to Rassinier, and based on Hilberg's data, the real number of Jewish NS victims was less than one million.4
Revisionist research has not stood still in the more than 35 years since the appearance of Rassinier's critique of Hilberg. However, there has never been a comprehensive analysis of the methods Hilberg applied nor a critical appraisal of his conclusions. The purpose of the present work is to remedy that lack.
Our investigation will concentrate on the following points:
uncontestably solid source material here. The mass shootings of Jews behind the eastern front are a different matter. It is not disputed by anyone that some shootings took place; what is in dispute by Revisionist researchers is the extent of these shootings as claimed by Hilberg and other orthodox historians. On this point too we will examine critically the numbers of victims Hilberg claims and the sources he has used.
In short, we will attempt to determine whether Hilberg's great work on the 'Holocaust' deserves the scholarly merit it lays claim to or must be found lacking.---"
have had to confront his work again and again. The first such confrontation was in 1964, three years after the appearance of the first edition of The Destruction of the European Jews. At that time, the Frenchman Paul
Rassinier, a former Resistance fighter, ex-prisoner of the NS concentration camps Buchenwald and Dora, and the founder of Revisionism, made a full attack on Hilberg. In his book Le Drame des Juifs Européens, Rassinier
made a thorough study of Hilberg's statistics on Jewish population losses during the Second World War. He rejected the latter's conclusion that the number of Jewish victims should be set at 5.1 million; he said Hilberg could only have arrived at this number by a gross manipulation of his data. According to Rassinier, and based on Hilberg's data, the real number of Jewish NS victims was less than one million.4
Revisionist research has not stood still in the more than 35 years since the appearance of Rassinier's critique of Hilberg. However, there has never been a comprehensive analysis of the methods Hilberg applied nor a critical appraisal of his conclusions. The purpose of the present work is to remedy that lack.
Our investigation will concentrate on the following points:
- What proofs does Hilberg provide that the NS regime planned the physical destruction of Jews living in its area of control?There will be no discussion on the persecutions and deportations of Jews during the Second World War nor on the suffering of Jews in camps and ghettos, which are doubted by almost nobody: Hilberg's work rests on
- What proofs does Hilberg provide for the existence of extermination camps, that is, camps erected solely or partially for the murder of Jews and provided with killing gas chambers for this purpose?
- What proofs does Hilberg provide for the figure of close to 5.1 million which he claims is the number of Jewish victims of National Socialist policy?
uncontestably solid source material here. The mass shootings of Jews behind the eastern front are a different matter. It is not disputed by anyone that some shootings took place; what is in dispute by Revisionist researchers is the extent of these shootings as claimed by Hilberg and other orthodox historians. On this point too we will examine critically the numbers of victims Hilberg claims and the sources he has used.
In short, we will attempt to determine whether Hilberg's great work on the 'Holocaust' deserves the scholarly merit it lays claim to or must be found lacking.---"
Skapa ett konto eller logga in för att kommentera
Du måste vara medlem för att kunna kommentera