Vinnaren i pepparkakshustävlingen!
I mitt arkiv hittade jag följande artikel
2014-04-29 Bjarne Moelv - Det demokratiska självmordet
https://drive.google.com/open?id=17morMA36DtWj0O6SNw0WBtvtie4ncWX_
Den gamla artikeln finns också men är en dålig, svårläst kopia
1987-10-05 DN - Moelv - Operation Olof
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1OhsjBdbSBKegm-Iv1aA6ZM51B3jlQ4UP
Lite shaky är utpekandet eftersom det var så långt emellan. Sen hade ju AW nerverna att stämma aftonbladet och expressen för ärekränkning, vilket man kanske skulle hållit sig ifrån om man var skyldig (?).
Anna Hage: "När hon kom fram till mannen som låg på gångbanan, såg hon att han blödde ur munnen och näsan. En kvinna stod brevid mannen och en man - Y - satt nedhukad vid den skaddes huvud" (FUP 225)
Nicola Fauzzi: "När Fauzzi vänder sig om är det 4-5 personer som står i en grupp. Förstser inte Fauzzi att någon person ligger ner. När någon i gruppen flyttar sig ser Fauzzi en person ligga ned på trottoaren" (FUP 92)
Stig Engström: "Han såg dock snart att någon låg på marken och även att det var folk omkring denne" (FUP 42)
Gösta Söderström: "10-12 personer stod runt en man som låg och blödde. Två personer höll på med livräddande åtgärder"
källa: http://lennartremstam.blogspot.com/2015/05/gosta-soderstrom-blir-intervjuad.html
Kjell Östling: "ca 8-10 personer fanns på brottsplatsen. Några pekade i riktning mot Tunnelgatan. En man låg på gatan, någon höll på med livräddande åtgärder"
källa: http://lennartremstam.blogspot.com/2015/05/polis-kjell-ostling-blir-intervjuad.html
"86 05-13 kl 11,30 sammanträffar krinsp/KK1 Lars Jonsson och Allan Bäckström med vittnet Stefan Glantz - tidigare hörd - anknyter till spaningsuppslag E 17 - i avsikt att utröna vilka personer som fanns invid den mördade Olof Palme och dennes hustru Lisbeth. Glantz förevisas i ärendet speciell upplagd fotosamling - över de sk "mordvittnena" - jämte ytterligare några foton - totalt 15 st fotografier. I fotosamlingen finns bla foton på Stig Engström, Lars Jeppsson, Anders Björkman Anna Hage och Karin Johansson mfl." (FUP 328)
Varför Lars Jeppsson ??
"I samband med att Anna steg ur bilen såg hon också en kvinna som stod intill den liggande mannen, Vidare fanns där en yngling som uppehöll sig vid mannens huvud, De båda iakttagna höll på att "joxa" med den liggande mannen. Ynglingen vid den liggande mannens huvud var klädd i en mellanblå midjejacka typ dunjacka och jeans, han hade smalt ansikte och var mörkhårig" (FUP 227)
"Glantz uppger att han tycker att foto E 15 - föreställande Lars Jeppsson verkar lite bekant utseendemässigt. Han kan inte dra sig till minnes från vilket sammanhang, men tror att han kanske sett ett foto på honom någon tidning" (FUP 328)
Lars Jeppsson: https://ibb.co/M84Gfsb
I Tingsrätten:
Åklagare Helin: ”När hon kom fram till mannen, som låg på gångbanan, såg hon att han blödde ur munnen och näsan. En kvinna stod bredvid mannen och en man, Y, satt nedhukad vid den skadades huvud.” Det avviker ju litegrand från vad du sade i dag för du sade att du var den som först kom fram till Olof Palme och efter en stund kom en annan fram och frågade om han kunde hjälpa till.
Hage: Ja.
Åklagare Helin: Hur är det med det där? Hage: Nej, jag var framme först. Åklagare Helin: Du var först.
Hage: Stefan Glans kom ju strax… strax efter..
Fråga: varför säger hon att han ”joxade”? Vad innebär det?
Hade Glantz mellanblå täckjacka och var mörkhårig så var det naturligtvis han, men vem som var framme först går inte att avgöra eftersom hon inte står fast vid de tidiga uppgifterna.
Vi har fortfarande ingen aning om hur han såg ut.
Det som gör det hela lite intressant är att Israelsson berättar om en blodig kille först på plats som han borde känt igen om det var Glantz. De var ju kompisar, men det ringde ingen klocka, ens när de gemensamt åkte därifrån i HJ:s taxi.
Jag tror Anna H säger "jag var framme först" för att bevisa att hon såg GM.
För att bevisa detsamma ändrar hon också GM:s position
"Hon lade samtidigt märke till en man som befann sig ett tiotal meter från den liggande männen, och springande lämnade platsen." (FUP 225)
"Samtidigt som hon såg den liggande mannen såg hon en man som sparng in på Tunnelgatan - österut, Avståndet mellan männen när hon upptäckte dem uppskattar hon till 5-7 meter." (FUP 226)
"Ja det är ett par meter, han förflyttar sig ju hela tiden så det är svårt att säga, men han var inte närmare än tre och en halv meter ifrån." (FUP 232)
joxa ?
Med "De båda iakttagna höll på att "joxa" med den liggande mannen"(FUP 227) Tror jag att hon menar, att de båda iakttagna vände på Olof.
Karin Johansson säger:
"När de kommer fram till mannen som ligger på platsen så väller det blod ur munnen på honom, kvinna bredvid är helt uppriven och en stor mängd folk har samlats på platsen" (FUP 263)
"Vi springer fram till mannen och kvinnan, då har Stefan kommit dit. De har lagt honom i framstupa sidoläge" (FUP 270)
Stefan Glantz måste ha sett GM, men trodde att det var en åskådare, ett vittne.
Svara
- Ämnesverktyg
- Visa första olästa
- Hitta inlägg efter datum
TRC:
MR WILLIAMSON: Yes, Mr Chairman, I have in fact given you documentation on Mr Bertiel Verdin, a Swedish journalist and in his case, he was in fact one of those journalists introduced to us as part of a Foreign Affairs programme. He came to South Africa to cover you know, for some journalistic reason and who was then recruited for other purposes. If I can just refer to that document. Sorry, which number is it? Yes, I have a memorandum. This was actually while I was still in the SAP, where I wrote to Colonel Goosen, who later became Brigadier Goosen. You can see on the top it was referred then to General Coetzee, saying the foreign journalist Bertiel Verdin, for whom you had made arrangements will visit South West Africa, Namibia, left the country on Sunday. He was particularly impressed with the positive and rendered a positive report to Mrs Thatcher and Mr Reagan's Foreign Affairs staff. And he also undertook to work with Mr Brian Crosio to investigate which South African exiles in Britain were also trained terrorists. And in his case, as has been well documented, his relationship became a close relationship with the Security Branch. He was paid for the information which he provided and in his case, interestingly enough, when he was charged in Britain, for the role he played, in receiving documentation stolen from the ANC and the PAC offices, he was in fact acquitted because as a journalist he had the legal right to do what we were paying him to do. It was not a crime for him to do what we wanted him to do. This was one of the reasons why these type of people were used, because he not only had the access, but in fact it was not illegal for him to do something that would have been illegal for a South African Police Officer or Intelligence Officer.
MR NTSEBEZA: And from the point of view of the South African Security Intelligence offices, he being (a) a foreign journalist and (b) a Swedish one at that, he was strategically very convenient for your purposes, because he wouldn't have credibility problems at first glance?
MR WILLIAMSON: No, he became quite close to the PAC in London.
MR NTSEBEZA: Yes, and Sweden was always also known to have been a supporter of the Liberation Movement in the form of the ANC, so he would also be able to get closer to the ANC without having any acceptance problems as a Swedish journalist?
MR WILLIAMSON: No, he had no South African connection. He was Swedish which is regarded in the world, and at that time, even now, as politically progressive country.
MR NTSEBEZA: Now, you possibly want to tell us about the categories of Human Intelligence employed by the Security Branch. I say so because Mr Horak has indicated that there were all sorts of, there were agents and this, maybe you want to tell us whether in your own way of dealing with the media, you had those sort of categories of people. Whether you operated specifically in the media, via people who were contracted, via people who were agents, via people who were informers, etc.
MR WILLIAMSON: Yes, Mr Chairman, the Intelligence game as we like to call it.
MR NTSEBEZA: Dangerous game, I must say.
MR WILLIAMSON: When you are dealing with agents and informers, it is the motivation, I heard very briefly what Mr Horak was saying, but I think I agree broadly with his categories, that you have professional agents. Full time serving members of the Intelligence Organisation. Then you have a whole spectrum of other people. We had what we called HK (Headquarter) sources. We had regional sources, like WWR, Witwatersrand sources. And like in the Soviet or other Intelligence Agencies, often the coding given to the source, was an indication of his level, his or her level in the hierarchy as it were. There were ideologically motivated people, there were people who were purely motivated by a pecuniary interest and there were a lot of Walter Mitty's who enjoined to be in this exciting, dark, dangerous world and I think it relates to agents in the media just as much as to agents in any other place. And the motivation and control of an agent was the same, whether he was in the media or anywhere else.
MR NTSEBEZA: Now, whatever category of agents maybe it was to a certain specific type of media persons whom you were targeting. Whether on contract or informers or whatever, did you have any formalised briefing sessions or workshops or "bosberaad's", at which you know, the whole purpose of them being used and targeted, was discussed and gone into?
MR WILLIAMSON: Yes, Mr Chairman. The media because of the centrally important role that the State saw it playing in the counter-revolutionary and the revolutionary struggle, there were a lot of attempts made not only to have specific agents who were recruited in the media who were doing specific jobs, in other words, like Mr Horak for example. He was an RS who at one time was handled by myself. The important thing was to have a different level of involvement in the media. Your agents of influence, people who would write certain stories or who would plant certain stories or who would take a certain line on a particular story. But then overall there was the Editorial policy of the paper and that was dealt with at a higher level and I was not really involved in that until I went down to Parliament and became a member of the President's Council. And at that time, I was involved in certain what I called STRATCOM type operations, where senior members of the media were taken on a "bosberaad" up to the border to Special Forces' bases, with the highest ranking Officers of the military, maybe of other Intelligence Agencies and there were, I recall one in 1987, shortly after I went down to Parliament, where a "bosberaad" was held where the main focus was on the Soviet Union and what they were going to, or possibly what they could do about Namibia and Angola and the withdrawal of the troops. And so Mr Horak, in his evidence also did touch on it. You have to see the State's relation with the media as a macro continuum. It goes right from the owners of the media, the people who owned the newspaper, the Editors who controlled the policy of the newspaper, right down to the chap who can clean the dustbin at night and stuff it all in an envelope and give it to you and you had to have agents through that entire spectrum. One was, I would refer mainly a tactical agent and the other was a more strategic agent. Somebody who would be able to influence the broad policy direction of the newspaper.
MR NTSEBEZA: In fact, I have a curious photograph here. I don't know whether it is speaking to what you have just said. I can identify you and I can identify one or two, one person who I think is a media person. And a number of Brigadiers. If you can take a look at that and see if it is possibly what you are talking about.
MR WILLIAMSON: Yes, Mr Chairman, this photograph was taken at Fort Doppies, the 3rd to the 5th of July 1987. And virtually the entire general staff of the Defence Force were there. The Minister, General Malan, General Geldenhuys, General Kat Liebenberg, The Chief of Staff, Finance, I can see him there. Chief of the Air Force is there, Chief of the Navy is there. The Chief of Military Strategic Communication, COMOPS is there, Brigadier Van Wyk. I am there. And then there are various journalists there. Mr Tertius Myburgh is there, Mr Willie Koen. Mr Alf Ries, some highly placed journalists. And this was a "bosberaad" basically up on the border, close to the Angolan border and the main focus was Soviet, how we South Africa and the newspapers and so on, were going to act or relate to what the Soviets were going to do. Soviets and Cubans were going to decide about pulling troops out of Angola in relation to the peace process.
MR WILLIAMSON: Yes, Mr Chairman, I have in fact given you documentation on Mr Bertiel Verdin, a Swedish journalist and in his case, he was in fact one of those journalists introduced to us as part of a Foreign Affairs programme. He came to South Africa to cover you know, for some journalistic reason and who was then recruited for other purposes. If I can just refer to that document. Sorry, which number is it? Yes, I have a memorandum. This was actually while I was still in the SAP, where I wrote to Colonel Goosen, who later became Brigadier Goosen. You can see on the top it was referred then to General Coetzee, saying the foreign journalist Bertiel Verdin, for whom you had made arrangements will visit South West Africa, Namibia, left the country on Sunday. He was particularly impressed with the positive and rendered a positive report to Mrs Thatcher and Mr Reagan's Foreign Affairs staff. And he also undertook to work with Mr Brian Crosio to investigate which South African exiles in Britain were also trained terrorists. And in his case, as has been well documented, his relationship became a close relationship with the Security Branch. He was paid for the information which he provided and in his case, interestingly enough, when he was charged in Britain, for the role he played, in receiving documentation stolen from the ANC and the PAC offices, he was in fact acquitted because as a journalist he had the legal right to do what we were paying him to do. It was not a crime for him to do what we wanted him to do. This was one of the reasons why these type of people were used, because he not only had the access, but in fact it was not illegal for him to do something that would have been illegal for a South African Police Officer or Intelligence Officer.
MR NTSEBEZA: And from the point of view of the South African Security Intelligence offices, he being (a) a foreign journalist and (b) a Swedish one at that, he was strategically very convenient for your purposes, because he wouldn't have credibility problems at first glance?
MR WILLIAMSON: No, he became quite close to the PAC in London.
MR NTSEBEZA: Yes, and Sweden was always also known to have been a supporter of the Liberation Movement in the form of the ANC, so he would also be able to get closer to the ANC without having any acceptance problems as a Swedish journalist?
MR WILLIAMSON: No, he had no South African connection. He was Swedish which is regarded in the world, and at that time, even now, as politically progressive country.
MR NTSEBEZA: Now, you possibly want to tell us about the categories of Human Intelligence employed by the Security Branch. I say so because Mr Horak has indicated that there were all sorts of, there were agents and this, maybe you want to tell us whether in your own way of dealing with the media, you had those sort of categories of people. Whether you operated specifically in the media, via people who were contracted, via people who were agents, via people who were informers, etc.
MR WILLIAMSON: Yes, Mr Chairman, the Intelligence game as we like to call it.
MR NTSEBEZA: Dangerous game, I must say.
MR WILLIAMSON: When you are dealing with agents and informers, it is the motivation, I heard very briefly what Mr Horak was saying, but I think I agree broadly with his categories, that you have professional agents. Full time serving members of the Intelligence Organisation. Then you have a whole spectrum of other people. We had what we called HK (Headquarter) sources. We had regional sources, like WWR, Witwatersrand sources. And like in the Soviet or other Intelligence Agencies, often the coding given to the source, was an indication of his level, his or her level in the hierarchy as it were. There were ideologically motivated people, there were people who were purely motivated by a pecuniary interest and there were a lot of Walter Mitty's who enjoined to be in this exciting, dark, dangerous world and I think it relates to agents in the media just as much as to agents in any other place. And the motivation and control of an agent was the same, whether he was in the media or anywhere else.
MR NTSEBEZA: Now, whatever category of agents maybe it was to a certain specific type of media persons whom you were targeting. Whether on contract or informers or whatever, did you have any formalised briefing sessions or workshops or "bosberaad's", at which you know, the whole purpose of them being used and targeted, was discussed and gone into?
MR WILLIAMSON: Yes, Mr Chairman. The media because of the centrally important role that the State saw it playing in the counter-revolutionary and the revolutionary struggle, there were a lot of attempts made not only to have specific agents who were recruited in the media who were doing specific jobs, in other words, like Mr Horak for example. He was an RS who at one time was handled by myself. The important thing was to have a different level of involvement in the media. Your agents of influence, people who would write certain stories or who would plant certain stories or who would take a certain line on a particular story. But then overall there was the Editorial policy of the paper and that was dealt with at a higher level and I was not really involved in that until I went down to Parliament and became a member of the President's Council. And at that time, I was involved in certain what I called STRATCOM type operations, where senior members of the media were taken on a "bosberaad" up to the border to Special Forces' bases, with the highest ranking Officers of the military, maybe of other Intelligence Agencies and there were, I recall one in 1987, shortly after I went down to Parliament, where a "bosberaad" was held where the main focus was on the Soviet Union and what they were going to, or possibly what they could do about Namibia and Angola and the withdrawal of the troops. And so Mr Horak, in his evidence also did touch on it. You have to see the State's relation with the media as a macro continuum. It goes right from the owners of the media, the people who owned the newspaper, the Editors who controlled the policy of the newspaper, right down to the chap who can clean the dustbin at night and stuff it all in an envelope and give it to you and you had to have agents through that entire spectrum. One was, I would refer mainly a tactical agent and the other was a more strategic agent. Somebody who would be able to influence the broad policy direction of the newspaper.
MR NTSEBEZA: In fact, I have a curious photograph here. I don't know whether it is speaking to what you have just said. I can identify you and I can identify one or two, one person who I think is a media person. And a number of Brigadiers. If you can take a look at that and see if it is possibly what you are talking about.
MR WILLIAMSON: Yes, Mr Chairman, this photograph was taken at Fort Doppies, the 3rd to the 5th of July 1987. And virtually the entire general staff of the Defence Force were there. The Minister, General Malan, General Geldenhuys, General Kat Liebenberg, The Chief of Staff, Finance, I can see him there. Chief of the Air Force is there, Chief of the Navy is there. The Chief of Military Strategic Communication, COMOPS is there, Brigadier Van Wyk. I am there. And then there are various journalists there. Mr Tertius Myburgh is there, Mr Willie Koen. Mr Alf Ries, some highly placed journalists. And this was a "bosberaad" basically up on the border, close to the Angolan border and the main focus was Soviet, how we South Africa and the newspapers and so on, were going to act or relate to what the Soviets were going to do. Soviets and Cubans were going to decide about pulling troops out of Angola in relation to the peace process.
TRC:
DECISION
This is an application for amnesty in terms of Section 18 of the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act 34 of 1995. The Applicants are all former members of the South African Security Forces ("SASP"). At the relevant time the Applicants were based at the notorious Vlakplaas Unit and De Kock was their Operational Commander, whilst Brigadier FW Schoon was the overall commander. They are seeking amnesty for the following crimes:
1. Conspiring at Piet Retief in or about 1986 to break into the offices of the Swedish International Development Agency ("SIDA");
2. Burglary into and theft of files, journals, photographs and a number of documents at the SIDA offices in or about 1986;
3. Malicious damage to property, namely a photocopying machine belonging to SIDA;
4. Abduction and intimidation of unknown persons at the SIDA offices in Manzini, Swaziland in or about 1986;
5. Defeating the ends of justice.
All these offences arise out of a burglary which was carried out by the Applicants in the said year and place into the offices of SIDA. We intend to summarise the facts and evidence which is as follows. According to De Kock in 1986 Glory Sedibe, a cadre of Umkhonto weSizwe ("MK"), the military wing of the African National Congress ("ANC") was abducted by members of the Vlakplaas Unit. He was subsequently turned and worked for the SASP at Vlakplaas. During interrogation Sedibe gave information about activities in SIDA offices. From the information that was obtained from him it appeared that SIDA was a pay-point not only for ANC supporters who had left the country, but for all political organisations and activists who were engaged in the struggle against the previous government. The offices had a number of files, documents and photographs of activists who had left the country to be engaged in the struggle in exile. Some of these refugees would be subsequently recruited to join MK. De Kock states that at the time it was well known that Scandinavian countries, Sweden in particular, supported the anti-apartheid struggle. They also worked very closely with the ANC in some of its activities.
De Kock discussed the information he had obtained with Frank Pienaar who was the head of the Security Branch in Piet Retief. They came to the conclusion that it would be better to get the documents, photographs and any relevant material at the SIDA offices. They were going to break into the said offices in the evening. They believed that these contained valuable information which would enable them, inter alia, to identify enemies of the South African Government in Swaziland, as well as the extent of the Scandinavian countries' involvement with liberation movements. This would also help them to update their own files in a whole number of respects. They were not going to seek prior approval from their superiors before launching the attack and De Kock very frankly states that it was their own initiative to protect the then existing political system. The offices were situated about one and a half blocks away from the Manzini Police Station, so they had to be very careful how they went about the operation.
On the day of the operation it was De Kock; Willemse; Bosch; Fourie and Lappies Labuschagne. Using false passports they entered Swaziland through the Nerston Border Post and proceeded to Manzini where they waited until late in the evening when there were no passers-by. They first went past the place several times to ascertain if there were any people there. At the convenient time and hour, approximately 9.00 p.m, they broke the door open with an axe. They entered and took several documents, photographs, files and accounting registers which reflected monies that had been paid to various people. They found a photocopier which they damaged in order that it could not be used again. Not all of them were armed and only those who did the breaking-in were armed with illegal weapons which were fitted in with silencers. Whilst they were busy sifting the many materials they had found there, a man and a woman came. The latter were commanded not to make any move but to face the wall at a distance of about five (5) to six (6) metres away from the Applicants. They continued with the sorting out of the materials, which were far too many to carry them all.
Fourie testified that he was a member of the Piet Retief Security Police under the command of W/O Frank Pienaar. He states that in the building they encountered about two (2) women and two (2) black youths. He ordered them to remain silent. They were never assaulted or abused by anyone of them. They were very much taken aback to see these people there as they believed that there were no persons residing there; they spontaneously screamed as they saw them. He grabbed one of them and slapped her on the face to compel her to keep quiet. he further states that he had a particular interest in the success of the operation because at the time hew was a member of C2 and was doing research on MK and APLA members' activities. They had photo albums of refugees as well as names of suspects they were trying to identify. Having thoroughly searched the offices they took all the possessions which they had found to Piet Retief Security Police offices where they again went through them with a fine tooth-comb to decipher all relevant information and compare it with what was already known to them.
Bosch testified and his evidence generally corroborated that of his co-Applicants.
Willemse did not testify at the hearing, due to health reasons. His legal representative Mr Attorney Lamey handed up a letter from psychiatrist Dr PA Van der Merwe dated 10 July 2000 and marked Exhibit B. Although the Committee initially expressed its reservations about the relevance and weight to be attached to such letter, we accept the statement from Mr Lamey that Willemse is presently not in a position to give viva voce evidence. There being no contradictions between the contents of his written application and the testimonies of his co-Applicants, we condone his non-attendance of the hearing and written application.
In any case, no gross human rights violation was committed in the incident and the matter could have been dealt with as a chamber matter in terms of the Act.
After considering the evidence in this matter, we are satisfied that all the Applicants have complied with the requirements of the Act. There is no doubt that the incident occurred as a the result of the conflict of the past. They further appear to have given a full disclosure of the relevant facts.
Amnesty is therefore GRANTED for all the offences.
SIGNED AT CAPE TOWN ON THIS 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2001
This is an application for amnesty in terms of Section 18 of the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act 34 of 1995. The Applicants are all former members of the South African Security Forces ("SASP"). At the relevant time the Applicants were based at the notorious Vlakplaas Unit and De Kock was their Operational Commander, whilst Brigadier FW Schoon was the overall commander. They are seeking amnesty for the following crimes:
1. Conspiring at Piet Retief in or about 1986 to break into the offices of the Swedish International Development Agency ("SIDA");
2. Burglary into and theft of files, journals, photographs and a number of documents at the SIDA offices in or about 1986;
3. Malicious damage to property, namely a photocopying machine belonging to SIDA;
4. Abduction and intimidation of unknown persons at the SIDA offices in Manzini, Swaziland in or about 1986;
5. Defeating the ends of justice.
All these offences arise out of a burglary which was carried out by the Applicants in the said year and place into the offices of SIDA. We intend to summarise the facts and evidence which is as follows. According to De Kock in 1986 Glory Sedibe, a cadre of Umkhonto weSizwe ("MK"), the military wing of the African National Congress ("ANC") was abducted by members of the Vlakplaas Unit. He was subsequently turned and worked for the SASP at Vlakplaas. During interrogation Sedibe gave information about activities in SIDA offices. From the information that was obtained from him it appeared that SIDA was a pay-point not only for ANC supporters who had left the country, but for all political organisations and activists who were engaged in the struggle against the previous government. The offices had a number of files, documents and photographs of activists who had left the country to be engaged in the struggle in exile. Some of these refugees would be subsequently recruited to join MK. De Kock states that at the time it was well known that Scandinavian countries, Sweden in particular, supported the anti-apartheid struggle. They also worked very closely with the ANC in some of its activities.
De Kock discussed the information he had obtained with Frank Pienaar who was the head of the Security Branch in Piet Retief. They came to the conclusion that it would be better to get the documents, photographs and any relevant material at the SIDA offices. They were going to break into the said offices in the evening. They believed that these contained valuable information which would enable them, inter alia, to identify enemies of the South African Government in Swaziland, as well as the extent of the Scandinavian countries' involvement with liberation movements. This would also help them to update their own files in a whole number of respects. They were not going to seek prior approval from their superiors before launching the attack and De Kock very frankly states that it was their own initiative to protect the then existing political system. The offices were situated about one and a half blocks away from the Manzini Police Station, so they had to be very careful how they went about the operation.
On the day of the operation it was De Kock; Willemse; Bosch; Fourie and Lappies Labuschagne. Using false passports they entered Swaziland through the Nerston Border Post and proceeded to Manzini where they waited until late in the evening when there were no passers-by. They first went past the place several times to ascertain if there were any people there. At the convenient time and hour, approximately 9.00 p.m, they broke the door open with an axe. They entered and took several documents, photographs, files and accounting registers which reflected monies that had been paid to various people. They found a photocopier which they damaged in order that it could not be used again. Not all of them were armed and only those who did the breaking-in were armed with illegal weapons which were fitted in with silencers. Whilst they were busy sifting the many materials they had found there, a man and a woman came. The latter were commanded not to make any move but to face the wall at a distance of about five (5) to six (6) metres away from the Applicants. They continued with the sorting out of the materials, which were far too many to carry them all.
Fourie testified that he was a member of the Piet Retief Security Police under the command of W/O Frank Pienaar. He states that in the building they encountered about two (2) women and two (2) black youths. He ordered them to remain silent. They were never assaulted or abused by anyone of them. They were very much taken aback to see these people there as they believed that there were no persons residing there; they spontaneously screamed as they saw them. He grabbed one of them and slapped her on the face to compel her to keep quiet. he further states that he had a particular interest in the success of the operation because at the time hew was a member of C2 and was doing research on MK and APLA members' activities. They had photo albums of refugees as well as names of suspects they were trying to identify. Having thoroughly searched the offices they took all the possessions which they had found to Piet Retief Security Police offices where they again went through them with a fine tooth-comb to decipher all relevant information and compare it with what was already known to them.
Bosch testified and his evidence generally corroborated that of his co-Applicants.
Willemse did not testify at the hearing, due to health reasons. His legal representative Mr Attorney Lamey handed up a letter from psychiatrist Dr PA Van der Merwe dated 10 July 2000 and marked Exhibit B. Although the Committee initially expressed its reservations about the relevance and weight to be attached to such letter, we accept the statement from Mr Lamey that Willemse is presently not in a position to give viva voce evidence. There being no contradictions between the contents of his written application and the testimonies of his co-Applicants, we condone his non-attendance of the hearing and written application.
In any case, no gross human rights violation was committed in the incident and the matter could have been dealt with as a chamber matter in terms of the Act.
After considering the evidence in this matter, we are satisfied that all the Applicants have complied with the requirements of the Act. There is no doubt that the incident occurred as a the result of the conflict of the past. They further appear to have given a full disclosure of the relevant facts.
Amnesty is therefore GRANTED for all the offences.
SIGNED AT CAPE TOWN ON THIS 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2001
Var det bara på slutet av 80-talet som Bjarne Moelv skrev någonting om Palmemordet.
Någon som har en länk till de tidningsartiklar han skrev?
Försökte leta i moparkivet men hittade ingenting.
Skrev han någonting om vart han hade fått sin information ifrån?
Någon som orkar ge en beskrivning av Moelvs teori?
Kan fribytarna ha haft något samband med SÄPO:s övervakningspm A 11544?
Hittade följande hos Aner:
"24.8.88, Expressen-ledare 24.8.88:
Okända mordhot mot Olof Palme!
25.8.88, Bjarne Moelv i DN: Fribytare
i säkerhets- och
underrättelseverksamheten?
14.12.88: Christer Pettersson,
bara Christer Pettersson, Christer...
Palme-joumalistiken dog, och
alla journalister deltog i likvakan.
Men, 6.11.00: Läs artikeln ”Tystnad,
förträngning” i det här numret! Läs!
Och jämför! SA."
http://runeberg.org/palmenytt/2000/0196.html
Någon som har en länk till de tidningsartiklar han skrev?
Försökte leta i moparkivet men hittade ingenting.
Skrev han någonting om vart han hade fått sin information ifrån?
Någon som orkar ge en beskrivning av Moelvs teori?
Kan fribytarna ha haft något samband med SÄPO:s övervakningspm A 11544?
Hittade följande hos Aner:
"24.8.88, Expressen-ledare 24.8.88:
Okända mordhot mot Olof Palme!
25.8.88, Bjarne Moelv i DN: Fribytare
i säkerhets- och
underrättelseverksamheten?
14.12.88: Christer Pettersson,
bara Christer Pettersson, Christer...
Palme-joumalistiken dog, och
alla journalister deltog i likvakan.
Men, 6.11.00: Läs artikeln ”Tystnad,
förträngning” i det här numret! Läs!
Och jämför! SA."
http://runeberg.org/palmenytt/2000/0196.html
__________________
Senast redigerad av Sumer 2019-10-26 kl. 22:19.
Senast redigerad av Sumer 2019-10-26 kl. 22:19.
Hur pass tillförlitliga är vittnesuppgifterna att Anth*n* Wh*te har setts i Säpos lokaler? Tycker att en del av tecknerskornas ”fantombilder” är ganska lika.
Citat:
Var det bara på slutet av 80-talet som Bjarne Moelv skrev någonting om Palmemordet.
Någon som har en länk till de tidningsartiklar han skrev?
Försökte leta i moparkivet men hittade ingenting.
Skrev han någonting om vart han hade fått sin information ifrån?
Någon som orkar ge en beskrivning av Moelvs teori?
Kan fribytarna ha haft något samband med SÄPO:s övervakningspm A 11544?
Hittade följande hos Aner:
"24.8.88, Expressen-ledare 24.8.88:
Okända mordhot mot Olof Palme!
25.8.88, Bjarne Moelv i DN: Fribytare
i säkerhets- och
underrättelseverksamheten?
14.12.88: Christer Pettersson,
bara Christer Pettersson, Christer...
Palme-joumalistiken dog, och
alla journalister deltog i likvakan.
Men, 6.11.00: Läs artikeln ”Tystnad,
förträngning” i det här numret! Läs!
Och jämför! SA."
http://runeberg.org/palmenytt/2000/0196.html
Någon som har en länk till de tidningsartiklar han skrev?
Försökte leta i moparkivet men hittade ingenting.
Skrev han någonting om vart han hade fått sin information ifrån?
Någon som orkar ge en beskrivning av Moelvs teori?
Kan fribytarna ha haft något samband med SÄPO:s övervakningspm A 11544?
Hittade följande hos Aner:
"24.8.88, Expressen-ledare 24.8.88:
Okända mordhot mot Olof Palme!
25.8.88, Bjarne Moelv i DN: Fribytare
i säkerhets- och
underrättelseverksamheten?
14.12.88: Christer Pettersson,
bara Christer Pettersson, Christer...
Palme-joumalistiken dog, och
alla journalister deltog i likvakan.
Men, 6.11.00: Läs artikeln ”Tystnad,
förträngning” i det här numret! Läs!
Och jämför! SA."
http://runeberg.org/palmenytt/2000/0196.html
I mitt arkiv hittade jag följande artikel
2014-04-29 Bjarne Moelv - Det demokratiska självmordet
https://drive.google.com/open?id=17morMA36DtWj0O6SNw0WBtvtie4ncWX_
Den gamla artikeln finns också men är en dålig, svårläst kopia
1987-10-05 DN - Moelv - Operation Olof
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1OhsjBdbSBKegm-Iv1aA6ZM51B3jlQ4UP
Är det nån som rotat mer i det s k GMP-objektet "GF"? Vad var det för kuf?
Störd. Hatade Palme. Våldsam. Ägde revolver. Bodde i mordområdet. Rörde sig klumigt. Rätt profil ålders- och utseendemässigt. Inget alibi.
Utreddes kring mitten av 90-talet men lite svårt att få grepp om på vilka grunder han avfördes. Känns ju ytligt sätt inte mindre intressant än den livligt omdiskuterade "GH" (Christer A).
Störd. Hatade Palme. Våldsam. Ägde revolver. Bodde i mordområdet. Rörde sig klumigt. Rätt profil ålders- och utseendemässigt. Inget alibi.
Utreddes kring mitten av 90-talet men lite svårt att få grepp om på vilka grunder han avfördes. Känns ju ytligt sätt inte mindre intressant än den livligt omdiskuterade "GH" (Christer A).
Citat:
Lite shaky är utpekandet eftersom det var så långt emellan. Sen hade ju AW nerverna att stämma aftonbladet och expressen för ärekränkning, vilket man kanske skulle hållit sig ifrån om man var skyldig (?).
Citat:
Anna Hage: "När hon kom fram till mannen som låg på gångbanan, såg hon att han blödde ur munnen och näsan. En kvinna stod brevid mannen och en man - Y - satt nedhukad vid den skaddes huvud" (FUP 225)
Nicola Fauzzi: "När Fauzzi vänder sig om är det 4-5 personer som står i en grupp. Förstser inte Fauzzi att någon person ligger ner. När någon i gruppen flyttar sig ser Fauzzi en person ligga ned på trottoaren" (FUP 92)
Stig Engström: "Han såg dock snart att någon låg på marken och även att det var folk omkring denne" (FUP 42)
Gösta Söderström: "10-12 personer stod runt en man som låg och blödde. Två personer höll på med livräddande åtgärder"
källa: http://lennartremstam.blogspot.com/2015/05/gosta-soderstrom-blir-intervjuad.html
Kjell Östling: "ca 8-10 personer fanns på brottsplatsen. Några pekade i riktning mot Tunnelgatan. En man låg på gatan, någon höll på med livräddande åtgärder"
källa: http://lennartremstam.blogspot.com/2015/05/polis-kjell-ostling-blir-intervjuad.html
"86 05-13 kl 11,30 sammanträffar krinsp/KK1 Lars Jonsson och Allan Bäckström med vittnet Stefan Glantz - tidigare hörd - anknyter till spaningsuppslag E 17 - i avsikt att utröna vilka personer som fanns invid den mördade Olof Palme och dennes hustru Lisbeth. Glantz förevisas i ärendet speciell upplagd fotosamling - över de sk "mordvittnena" - jämte ytterligare några foton - totalt 15 st fotografier. I fotosamlingen finns bla foton på Stig Engström, Lars Jeppsson, Anders Björkman Anna Hage och Karin Johansson mfl." (FUP 328)
Varför Lars Jeppsson ??
"I samband med att Anna steg ur bilen såg hon också en kvinna som stod intill den liggande mannen, Vidare fanns där en yngling som uppehöll sig vid mannens huvud, De båda iakttagna höll på att "joxa" med den liggande mannen. Ynglingen vid den liggande mannens huvud var klädd i en mellanblå midjejacka typ dunjacka och jeans, han hade smalt ansikte och var mörkhårig" (FUP 227)
"Glantz uppger att han tycker att foto E 15 - föreställande Lars Jeppsson verkar lite bekant utseendemässigt. Han kan inte dra sig till minnes från vilket sammanhang, men tror att han kanske sett ett foto på honom någon tidning" (FUP 328)
Lars Jeppsson: https://ibb.co/M84Gfsb
__________________
Senast redigerad av 299792458 2019-10-27 kl. 13:06.
Senast redigerad av 299792458 2019-10-27 kl. 13:06.
Citat:
Hage säger i de två första förhören att det var en man kille där före henne, som joxade med huvudet, men hon anser att hon är felciterad trots att hon läst igenom och godkänt förhören.Anna Hage: "När hon kom fram till mannen som låg på gångbanan, såg hon att han blödde ur munnen och näsan. En kvinna stod brevid mannen och en man - Y - satt nedhukad vid den skaddes huvud" (FUP 225)
Nicola Fauzzi: "När Fauzzi vänder sig om är det 4-5 personer som står i en grupp. Förstser inte Fauzzi att någon person ligger ner. När någon i gruppen flyttar sig ser Fauzzi en person ligga ned på trottoaren" (FUP 92)
Stig Engström: "Han såg dock snart att någon låg på marken och även att det var folk omkring denne" (FUP 42)
Gösta Söderström: "10-12 personer stod runt en man som låg och blödde. Två personer höll på med livräddande åtgärder"
källa: http://lennartremstam.blogspot.com/2015/05/gosta-soderstrom-blir-intervjuad.html
Kjell Östling: "ca 8-10 personer fanns på brottsplatsen. Några pekade i riktning mot Tunnelgatan. En man låg på gatan, någon höll på med livräddande åtgärder"
källa: http://lennartremstam.blogspot.com/2015/05/polis-kjell-ostling-blir-intervjuad.html
"86 05-13 kl 11,30 sammanträffar krinsp/KK1 Lars Jonsson och Allan Bäckström med vittnet Stefan Glantz - tidigare hörd - anknyter till spaningsuppslag E 17 - i avsikt att utröna vilka personer som fanns invid den mördade Olof Palme och dennes hustru Lisbeth. Glantz förevisas i ärendet speciell upplagd fotosamling - över de sk "mordvittnena" - jämte ytterligare några foton - totalt 15 st fotografier. I fotosamlingen finns bla foton på Stig Engström, Lars Jeppsson, Anders Björkman Anna Hage och Karin Johansson mfl." (FUP 328)
Varför Lars Jeppsson ??
"I samband med att Anna steg ur bilen såg hon också en kvinna som stod intill den liggande mannen, Vidare fanns där en yngling som uppehöll sig vid mannens huvud, De båda iakttagna höll på att "joxa" med den liggande mannen. Ynglingen vid den liggande mannens huvud var klädd i en mellanblå midjejacka typ dunjacka och jeans, han hade smalt ansikte och var mörkhårig" (FUP 227)
"Glantz uppger att han tycker att foto E 15 - föreställande Lars Jeppsson verkar lite bekant utseendemässigt. Han kan inte dra sig till minnes från vilket sammanhang, men tror att han kanske sett ett foto på honom någon tidning" (FUP 328)
Lars Jeppsson: https://ibb.co/M84Gfsb
Nicola Fauzzi: "När Fauzzi vänder sig om är det 4-5 personer som står i en grupp. Förstser inte Fauzzi att någon person ligger ner. När någon i gruppen flyttar sig ser Fauzzi en person ligga ned på trottoaren" (FUP 92)
Stig Engström: "Han såg dock snart att någon låg på marken och även att det var folk omkring denne" (FUP 42)
Gösta Söderström: "10-12 personer stod runt en man som låg och blödde. Två personer höll på med livräddande åtgärder"
källa: http://lennartremstam.blogspot.com/2015/05/gosta-soderstrom-blir-intervjuad.html
Kjell Östling: "ca 8-10 personer fanns på brottsplatsen. Några pekade i riktning mot Tunnelgatan. En man låg på gatan, någon höll på med livräddande åtgärder"
källa: http://lennartremstam.blogspot.com/2015/05/polis-kjell-ostling-blir-intervjuad.html
"86 05-13 kl 11,30 sammanträffar krinsp/KK1 Lars Jonsson och Allan Bäckström med vittnet Stefan Glantz - tidigare hörd - anknyter till spaningsuppslag E 17 - i avsikt att utröna vilka personer som fanns invid den mördade Olof Palme och dennes hustru Lisbeth. Glantz förevisas i ärendet speciell upplagd fotosamling - över de sk "mordvittnena" - jämte ytterligare några foton - totalt 15 st fotografier. I fotosamlingen finns bla foton på Stig Engström, Lars Jeppsson, Anders Björkman Anna Hage och Karin Johansson mfl." (FUP 328)
Varför Lars Jeppsson ??
"I samband med att Anna steg ur bilen såg hon också en kvinna som stod intill den liggande mannen, Vidare fanns där en yngling som uppehöll sig vid mannens huvud, De båda iakttagna höll på att "joxa" med den liggande mannen. Ynglingen vid den liggande mannens huvud var klädd i en mellanblå midjejacka typ dunjacka och jeans, han hade smalt ansikte och var mörkhårig" (FUP 227)
"Glantz uppger att han tycker att foto E 15 - föreställande Lars Jeppsson verkar lite bekant utseendemässigt. Han kan inte dra sig till minnes från vilket sammanhang, men tror att han kanske sett ett foto på honom någon tidning" (FUP 328)
Lars Jeppsson: https://ibb.co/M84Gfsb
I Tingsrätten:
Åklagare Helin: ”När hon kom fram till mannen, som låg på gångbanan, såg hon att han blödde ur munnen och näsan. En kvinna stod bredvid mannen och en man, Y, satt nedhukad vid den skadades huvud.” Det avviker ju litegrand från vad du sade i dag för du sade att du var den som först kom fram till Olof Palme och efter en stund kom en annan fram och frågade om han kunde hjälpa till.
Hage: Ja.
Åklagare Helin: Hur är det med det där? Hage: Nej, jag var framme först. Åklagare Helin: Du var först.
Hage: Stefan Glans kom ju strax… strax efter..
Fråga: varför säger hon att han ”joxade”? Vad innebär det?
Hade Glantz mellanblå täckjacka och var mörkhårig så var det naturligtvis han, men vem som var framme först går inte att avgöra eftersom hon inte står fast vid de tidiga uppgifterna.
Vi har fortfarande ingen aning om hur han såg ut.
Det som gör det hela lite intressant är att Israelsson berättar om en blodig kille först på plats som han borde känt igen om det var Glantz. De var ju kompisar, men det ringde ingen klocka, ens när de gemensamt åkte därifrån i HJ:s taxi.
Citat:
Hage säger i de två första förhören att det var en man kille där före henne, som joxade med huvudet, men hon anser att hon är felciterad trots att hon läst igenom och godkänt förhören.
I Tingsrätten:
Åklagare Helin: ”När hon kom fram till mannen, som låg på gångbanan, såg hon att han blödde ur munnen och näsan. En kvinna stod bredvid mannen och en man, Y, satt nedhukad vid den skadades huvud.” Det avviker ju litegrand från vad du sade i dag för du sade att du var den som först kom fram till Olof Palme och efter en stund kom en annan fram och frågade om han kunde hjälpa till.
Hage: Ja.
Åklagare Helin: Hur är det med det där? Hage: Nej, jag var framme först. Åklagare Helin: Du var först.
Hage: Stefan Glans kom ju strax… strax efter..
Fråga: varför säger hon att han ”joxade”? Vad innebär det?
Hade Glantz mellanblå täckjacka och var mörkhårig så var det naturligtvis han, men vem som var framme först går inte att avgöra eftersom hon inte står fast vid de tidiga uppgifterna.
Vi har fortfarande ingen aning om hur han såg ut.
Det som gör det hela lite intressant är att Israelsson berättar om en blodig kille först på plats som han borde känt igen om det var Glantz. De var ju kompisar, men det ringde ingen klocka, ens när de gemensamt åkte därifrån i HJ:s taxi.
I Tingsrätten:
Åklagare Helin: ”När hon kom fram till mannen, som låg på gångbanan, såg hon att han blödde ur munnen och näsan. En kvinna stod bredvid mannen och en man, Y, satt nedhukad vid den skadades huvud.” Det avviker ju litegrand från vad du sade i dag för du sade att du var den som först kom fram till Olof Palme och efter en stund kom en annan fram och frågade om han kunde hjälpa till.
Hage: Ja.
Åklagare Helin: Hur är det med det där? Hage: Nej, jag var framme först. Åklagare Helin: Du var först.
Hage: Stefan Glans kom ju strax… strax efter..
Fråga: varför säger hon att han ”joxade”? Vad innebär det?
Hade Glantz mellanblå täckjacka och var mörkhårig så var det naturligtvis han, men vem som var framme först går inte att avgöra eftersom hon inte står fast vid de tidiga uppgifterna.
Vi har fortfarande ingen aning om hur han såg ut.
Det som gör det hela lite intressant är att Israelsson berättar om en blodig kille först på plats som han borde känt igen om det var Glantz. De var ju kompisar, men det ringde ingen klocka, ens när de gemensamt åkte därifrån i HJ:s taxi.
Jag tror Anna H säger "jag var framme först" för att bevisa att hon såg GM.
För att bevisa detsamma ändrar hon också GM:s position
"Hon lade samtidigt märke till en man som befann sig ett tiotal meter från den liggande männen, och springande lämnade platsen." (FUP 225)
"Samtidigt som hon såg den liggande mannen såg hon en man som sparng in på Tunnelgatan - österut, Avståndet mellan männen när hon upptäckte dem uppskattar hon till 5-7 meter." (FUP 226)
"Ja det är ett par meter, han förflyttar sig ju hela tiden så det är svårt att säga, men han var inte närmare än tre och en halv meter ifrån." (FUP 232)
joxa ?
Med "De båda iakttagna höll på att "joxa" med den liggande mannen"(FUP 227) Tror jag att hon menar, att de båda iakttagna vände på Olof.
Karin Johansson säger:
"När de kommer fram till mannen som ligger på platsen så väller det blod ur munnen på honom, kvinna bredvid är helt uppriven och en stor mängd folk har samlats på platsen" (FUP 263)
"Vi springer fram till mannen och kvinnan, då har Stefan kommit dit. De har lagt honom i framstupa sidoläge" (FUP 270)
Stefan Glantz måste ha sett GM, men trodde att det var en åskådare, ett vittne.
__________________
Senast redigerad av 299792458 2019-10-27 kl. 15:41.
Senast redigerad av 299792458 2019-10-27 kl. 15:41.
Anna Hage ser GM innan Hans Johansson (med Stefan Glantz) kommer till och stannar vid brottsplatsen
"Hon lade samtidigt märke till en man som befann sig ett tiotal meter från den liggande männen, och springande lämnade platsen." (FUP 225)
"När Johansson stannat bilen var mannen ca 25 meter bort in i gränden" (FUP 300)
- Y - är inte Stefan Glantz ?
Hans Johansson (med Stefan Glantz) kör en U-sväng, samtidigt som Anna Hage och Karin Johansson springer mot brottsplatsen
Jan Nilsson säger:
"Men jag vet att när jag kom fram-, just före när jag kom fram till ljusen på Sveavägen när jag kommer Tunnelgatan på väg upp till Sveavägen, så ser jag en taxi kör en U-sväng. Jag ser två flickor kommer springande. Att någonting hade hänt, det visste jag" (FUP 337)
"Dom sprang fram till någonting som inte jag såg just när jag står vid Tunnelgatan genom att jag har taxin framför mig" (FUP 338)
"Hon lade samtidigt märke till en man som befann sig ett tiotal meter från den liggande männen, och springande lämnade platsen." (FUP 225)
"När Johansson stannat bilen var mannen ca 25 meter bort in i gränden" (FUP 300)
- Y - är inte Stefan Glantz ?
Hans Johansson (med Stefan Glantz) kör en U-sväng, samtidigt som Anna Hage och Karin Johansson springer mot brottsplatsen
Jan Nilsson säger:
"Men jag vet att när jag kom fram-, just före när jag kom fram till ljusen på Sveavägen när jag kommer Tunnelgatan på väg upp till Sveavägen, så ser jag en taxi kör en U-sväng. Jag ser två flickor kommer springande. Att någonting hade hänt, det visste jag" (FUP 337)
"Dom sprang fram till någonting som inte jag såg just när jag står vid Tunnelgatan genom att jag har taxin framför mig" (FUP 338)
__________________
Senast redigerad av 299792458 2019-10-27 kl. 17:16.
Senast redigerad av 299792458 2019-10-27 kl. 17:16.
Skapa ett konto eller logga in för att kommentera
Du måste vara medlem för att kunna kommentera
