Jag har aldrig sagt det var bra, jag har sagt det flera ggr nu att det var Clinton som drog upp hennes namn vid presidents-debatten inför hela världen, har inte Hillary bidragit med något positivt för kvinnor?? Varför har man gett henne medborgarskap när hon på 1 min erkänner saker som skulle fått henne inlåst i 20 år om det vore USA. Hon är en säkerhetsrisk med sitt förflutna. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=we8OnvlWSHg
Trump gav henne en andra chans, som han har gett andra kvinnor https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVAbUVB_9H0
Vad säger det om Hillary som nyligen kallat bernie-supportrar för losers?
"It's not important! It happened 20 years ago!"
"But Donald Trump called me fat! 20 years ago!"
Du menar att Trump tvångsmässigt måste prata om den här kvinnan för att Clinton tog upp det. Såna tvångsmässiga beteenden kan aldrig vara bra för en president. Att inte kunna hålla sig från oväsentligheter gör honom direkt olämplig. Eller hur?
Två bra och sakliga inlägg. Ganska sällsynt på det här forumet. (Finns ju en hel del antisemitiska- och rasistiska Flashbackdårar som huserar här! Inte överraskande i och för sig.)
Ska bli intressant att se (om det nu blir så) hur det republikanska partiet kommer att hantera en verklighet med ytterliga 4 år med en demokrat som president.
Kommer de att förändras i grunden? Kommer de att inse att det inom en snar framtid inte går att vinna val om man skrämmer bort kvinnor och framförallt latinos.
USA blir ju mer och mer urbant och folk har ju dessutom blivit allt tolerantare i kulturella frågor. Det är ju en helt annan mångfald nu än för 10-15 år sedan.
År 2004 vann George W Bush presidentvalet just genom att t ex övertyga konservativa väljare i Ohio om att kulturella frågor som abort och HBT-rättigheter var centrala. men det skulle inte vara möjligt nu då USA ser helt annorlunda ut idag.
Demokraterna har ju liksom vunnit den sortens politiska strider om värderingsfrågor i USA, det så kallade kulturkriget.
Kanske kommer GOP inse att de måste byta spår till nästa val, 2020, för att få tillbaka (allt större) minoriteter, välutbildade väljare och kvinnor.
Om inte har vi definitivt en demokratisk era framför oss.
Du säger att republikanerna måste locka latinos. Och du föreslår bland annat att republikanerna ska bli för abort?
Latinos är mer anti-abort än vad vita är. Därför abortlagstiftningen är väldigt restriktiv i så gott som hela Latinamerika.
Om demokraterna kan förskjuta värderingslandskapet till sin fördel så kan givetvis republikanerna göra samma sak.
Donald Trump är första gången sedan 2004 som republikanerna faktiskt har en chans att vinna ett presidentval.
Trump Tax Records Obtained by The Times Reveal He Could Have Avoided Paying Taxes for Nearly Two Decades
Edit:
"They were mailed to NYTimes, the postmark said NYC, and the return address was Trump Tower so the person who sent them wanted to say it was from Trump Tower. Trump's 80 year old former accountant confirmed that they are real because he remembered the the loss was too large for the computer program they used." https://twitter.com/chelseagsummers/status/782399264790052864
Citat:
THE TAX RETURNS ARE COMING FROM INSIDE THE HOUSE
__________________
Senast redigerad av zergrush 2016-10-02 kl. 04:48.
Edit:
"They were mailed to NYTimes, the postmark said NYC, and the return address was Trump Tower so the person who sent them wanted to say it was from Trump Tower. Trump's 80 year old former accountant confirmed that they are real because he remembered the the loss was too large for the computer program they used." https://twitter.com/chelseagsummers/status/782399264790052864
Ta det lite lungt. Om man inte betalar skatt i USA så får man skatteverket på sig. Sådant vet alla.
Oftast när man "fuskar" med skatten så betyder det att man har drivit "utländska" företag inrikes och därmed kan man redovisa skatterna i samma land som företaget befinner sig i.
Detta är en klassiker och sådant förekommer även Sverige. Men media försöker få det som att Trump har nekat inför skatteverket att betala in skatt. Bara okunniga tror på sådant. Trump har säkert gjort som alla andra, drivit konsultbolag för att redovisa skatter i andra länder.
Det ser dock inte snyggt ut. Men det är så man blir rik. Alla miljardärer undviker skatt. Skatt är krångligt och bedrövligt enligt miljardärerna i USA. Man tappat så mycket vinst som går ned i andras privata fickor.
Så "skattefusk" är vanligt. Men skattefuskar man så åker man dit direkt. Folk verkar få det som skatt är frivilligt att betala skatt i USA .
Trump nämnde, och härmade, på sitt möte han hade igår, Hillarys Clintons incident från 11:e september i år då denne hade svårigheter att ta sig till sin väntade bil efter en minnesstund i centrala New York. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DxgjOeWSOc
Kaxig han är. Han jämför sin effektivitet jämfört med Clintons effektivitet.
Visst. Trump är alltid uppe på fötterna jämfört med Clinton som har problem att gå i trappor.
Edit:
Clinton har dessutom blivit rätt så fet de senaste 5 åren. Förr i tiden så gick Clinton alltid runt i kostym och högklack. Nu går hon runt i regnkläder och lågklack som liknar tofflor. Fattas bara en gul fiskemössa.
__________________
Senast redigerad av G.Zamani 2016-10-02 kl. 06:05.
Hur ser ni på att Trump inte har några problem med att ljuga spontant mest hela tiden? Var det 15 solklara lögner i senaste debatten? Är det okej för er att Trump medvetet ljuger?
Hur ser ni på att Trump inte har några problem med att ljuga spontant mest hela tiden? Var det 15 solklara lögner i senaste debatten? Är det okej för er att Trump medvetet ljuger?
Lista de då. (eller gör inte det, så slipper jag svara)
Vice presidential debate
Tuesday, October 4, 2016
The debate will start at 9:00 p.m. Eastern Time and is scheduled to run for 90 minutes without commercial breaks.
Moderator: Elaine Quijano, Anchor, CBSN and Correspondent, CBS News
Location: Longwood University, Farmville, VA
The Vice Presidential debate will be divided into nine time segments of approximately 10 minutes each. The moderator will ask an opening question, after which each candidate will have two minutes to respond. The moderator will use the balance of the time in the segment for a deeper discussion of the topic.
Ett stycke transcript ur debatten om polis, lag och ordning.
HOLT: All right, Mr. Trump, you have two minutes. How do you heal the divide?
TRUMP: Well, first of all, Secretary Clinton doesn't want to use a couple of words, and that's law and order. And we need law and order. If we don't have it, we're not going to have a country.
And when I look at what's going on in Charlotte, a city I love, a city where I have investments, when I look at what's going on throughout various parts of our country, whether it's -- I mean, I can just keep naming them all day long -- we need law and order in our country.
I just got today the, as you know, the endorsement of the Fraternal Order of Police, we just -- just came in. We have endorsements from, I think, almost every police group, very -- I mean, a large percentage of them in the United States.
We have a situation where we have our inner cities, African- Americans, Hispanics are living in he'll because it's so dangerous. You walk down the street, you get shot.
In Chicago, they've had thousands of shootings, thousands since January 1st. Thousands of shootings. And I'm saying, where is this? Is this a war-torn country? What are we doing? And we have to stop the violence. We have to bring back law and order. In a place like Chicago, where thousands of people have been killed, thousands over the last number of years, in fact, almost 4,000 have been killed since Barack Obama became president, over -- almost 4,000 people in Chicago have been killed. We have to bring back law and order.
Now, whether or not in a place like Chicago you do stop and frisk, which worked very well, Mayor Giuliani is here, worked very well in New York. It brought the crime rate way down. But you take the gun away from criminals that shouldn't be having it.
We have gangs roaming the street. And in many cases, they're illegally here, illegal immigrants. And they have guns. And they shoot people. And we have to be very strong. And we have to be very vigilant.
We have to be -- we have to know what we're doing. Right now, our police, in many cases, are afraid to do anything. We have to protect our inner cities, because African-American communities are being decimated by crime, decimated.
HOLT: Your two -- your two minutes expired, but I do want to follow up. Stop-and-frisk was ruled unconstitutional in New York, because it largely singled out black and Hispanic young men.
TRUMP: No, you're wrong. It went before a judge, who was a very against-police judge. It was taken away from her. And our mayor, our new mayor, refused to go forward with the case. They would have won an appeal. If you look at it, throughout the country, there are many places where it's allowed.
HOLT: The argument is that it's a form of racial profiling.
TRUMP: No, the argument is that we have to take the guns away from these people that have them and they are bad people that shouldn't have them.
These are felons. These are people that are bad people that shouldn't be -- when you have 3,000 shootings in Chicago from January 1st, when you have 4,000 people killed in Chicago by guns, from the beginning of the presidency of Barack Obama, his hometown, you have to have stop-and-frisk.
You need more police. You need a better community, you know, relation. You don't have good community relations in Chicago. It's terrible. I have property there. It's terrible what's going on in Chicago.
But when you look -- and Chicago's not the only -- you go to Ferguson, you go to so many different places. You need better relationships. I agree with Secretary Clinton on this.
TRUMP: You need better relationships between the communities and the police, because in some cases, it's not good.
But you look at Dallas, where the relationships were really studied, the relationships were really a beautiful thing, and then five police officers were killed one night very violently. So there's some bad things going on. Some really bad things.
HOLT: Secretary Clinton...
TRUMP: But we need -- Lester, we need law and order. And we need law and order in the inner cities, because the people that are most affected by what's happening are African-American and Hispanic people. And it's very unfair to them what our politicians are allowing to happen.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOLT: Secretary Clinton?
CLINTON: Well, I've heard -- I've heard Donald say this at his rallies, and it's really unfortunate that he paints such a dire negative picture of black communities in our country.
TRUMP: Ugh.
CLINTON: You know, the vibrancy of the black church, the black businesses that employ so many people, the opportunities that so many families are working to provide for their kids. There's a lot that we should be proud of and we should be supporting and lifting up.
But we do always have to make sure we keep people safe. There are the right ways of doing it, and then there are ways that are ineffective. Stop-and-frisk was found to be unconstitutional and, in part, because it was ineffective. It did not do what it needed to do.
Now, I believe in community policing. And, in fact, violent crime is one-half of what it was in 1991. Property crime is down 40 percent. We just don't want to see it creep back up. We've had 25 years of very good cooperation.
But there were some problems, some unintended consequences. Too many young African-American and Latino men ended up in jail for nonviolent offenses. And it's just a fact that if you're a young African-American man and you do the same thing as a young white man, you are more likely to be arrested, charged, convicted, and incarcerated. So we've got to address the systemic racism in our criminal justice system. We cannot just say law and order. We have to say -- we have to come forward with a plan that is going to divert people from the criminal justice system, deal with mandatory minimum sentences, which have put too many people away for too long for doing too little.
We need to have more second chance programs. I'm glad that we're ending private prisons in the federal system; I want to see them ended in the state system. You shouldn't have a profit motivation to fill prison cells with young Americans. So there are some positive ways we can work on this.
And I believe strongly that commonsense gun safety measures would assist us. Right now -- and this is something Donald has supported, along with the gun lobby -- right now, we've got too many military- style weapons on the streets. In a lot of places, our police are outgunned. We need comprehensive background checks, and we need to keep guns out of the hands of those who will do harm.
And we finally need to pass a prohibition on anyone who's on the terrorist watch list from being able to buy a gun in our country. If you're too dangerous to fly, you are too dangerous to buy a gun. So there are things we can do, and we ought to do it in a bipartisan way.
HOLT: Secretary Clinton, last week, you said we've got to do everything possible to improve policing, to go right at implicit bias. Do you believe that police are implicitly biased against black people?
CLINTON: Lester, I think implicit bias is a problem for everyone, not just police. I think, unfortunately, too many of us in our great country jump to conclusions about each other. And therefore, I think we need all of us to be asking hard questions about, you know, why am I feeling this way?
But when it comes to policing, since it can have literally fatal consequences, I have said, in my first budget, we would put money into that budget to help us deal with implicit bias by retraining a lot of our police officers.
I've met with a group of very distinguished, experienced police chiefs a few weeks ago. They admit it's an issue. They've got a lot of concerns. Mental health is one of the biggest concerns, because now police are having to handle a lot of really difficult mental health problems on the street.
CLINTON: They want support, they want more training, they want more assistance. And I think the federal government could be in a position where we would offer and provide that.
__________________
Senast redigerad av heis 2016-10-02 kl. 07:39.
Det finns en amerikansk anti-etablissemangssajt kallad Veterans Today. Den skriver för krigsmakts-veteraner. Och är typ frihetlig höger. Och emot Trump, vad jag kan förstå. (Kanske är man pro Jill Stein, vad vet jag; man är iaf absolut ej pro Hillary.)
Vad betyder VT:s anti-Trump-hållning i den metapolitiska aspekten av Trump? Kan någon i tråden säga mig det?
Jag bryr mig personligen inte om Veterans Today men ovanstående faktum kanske betyder något i en vidare kontext -- och i så fall vad?
Amerikansk media och svensk media är väldigt vänster. Läsarna ges dynga och lögner ämnade att få Hillary vald. Trump kommer krossa Hillary på valdagen. Hon hör hemma i Nordkorea med sina ideer.