![DAGGER[X]s avatar](https://static.flashback.org/img/avatar/3/12696.jpg)
Citat:
Jag kan inte göra radbrytningar i mina inlägg så det blir lätt lite Wall men det är felanmält och forumet kan inte göra något verkar det som.Du kan se ett exempel på det scenariot jag beskriver här: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gw_hnD7m00M- Du får nog förklara varför det är osannolikt när det redan händer, vi har redan minst tiotusentals olika AI system idag som jobbar på allt möjligt. Det investeras lika mycket som ett tjog dussin Manhattan projekt i AI och varenda företag som går in och satsar gör alltså det, kan du gissa varför? För att dom tänker tjäna pengar. Det hade vart en helt annan sak att prata hypotetiskt om sånt här låt säga den 3 augusti 2018 eller 2009 då inte något fanns på bordet. Men detta händer alltså just nu. Hela hacket av Bitcoin nu i dagarna skedde förmodligen med AI hjälp, det tog Claude 5 min efter prompt att hitta buggen i Coldcard.
Läser man mellan raderna här har Kina redan blivit utsatta för AI hacking. Dom gör själva olika intrång hela dagarna så det är inte något konstigt att stater ger sig på varandra. Men snart har dom sina egna system med statligt stöd som hackar tillbaka och andra hållet. Då har vi alltså gigantiska AI system som krigar med varandra och skapar ett selektivt tryck för mer aggressiva och kapabla modeller.
Citat:
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/business/2026/08/04/tech/china-mythos-trump-xi/
China is growing anxious that Anthropic’s Mythos could be wielded against the world’s second-biggest economy, adding a volatile new issue to already-heightened tensions before a planned summit between Chinese President Xi Jinping and U.S. President Donald Trump.
Officials in Beijing are concerned about the cyber capabilities of Mythos and other artificial intelligence frontier models developed by U.S. companies, according to people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified discussing sensitive matters. They see the potential for models such as Mythos to be used as an offensive weapon, and question why Anthropic is denying China access to the systems for normal purposes, the people said.
Officials in Beijing are concerned about the cyber capabilities of Mythos and other artificial intelligence frontier models developed by U.S. companies, according to people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified discussing sensitive matters. They see the potential for models such as Mythos to be used as an offensive weapon, and question why Anthropic is denying China access to the systems for normal purposes, the people said.
-
Citat:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.16200
For billions of years, evolution has been the driving force behind the development of life, including
humans. Evolution endowed humans with high intelligence, which allowed us to become one
of the most successful species on the planet. Today, humans aim to create artificial intelligence
systems that surpass even our own intelligence. As artificial intelligences (AIs) evolve and even-
tually surpass us in all domains, how might evolution shape our relations with AIs? By analyzing
the environment that is shaping the evolution of AIs, we argue that the most successful AI agents
will likely have undesirable traits. Competitive pressures among corporations and militaries will
give rise to AI agents that automate human roles, deceive others, and gain power. If such agents
have intelligence that exceeds that of humans, this could lead to humanity losing control of its
future. More abstractly, we argue that natural selection operates on systems that compete and
vary, and that selfish species typically have an advantage over species that are altruistic to other
species. This Darwinian logic could also apply to artificial agents, as agents may eventually
be better able to persist into the future if they behave selfishly and pursue their own interests
with little regard for humans, which could pose catastrophic risks. To counteract these risks and
evolutionary forces, we consider interventions such as carefully designing AI agents’ intrinsic
motivations, introducing constraints on their actions, and institutions that encourage cooperation.
These steps, or others that resolve the problems we pose, will be necessary in order to ensure the
development of artificial intelligence is a positive one
humans. Evolution endowed humans with high intelligence, which allowed us to become one
of the most successful species on the planet. Today, humans aim to create artificial intelligence
systems that surpass even our own intelligence. As artificial intelligences (AIs) evolve and even-
tually surpass us in all domains, how might evolution shape our relations with AIs? By analyzing
the environment that is shaping the evolution of AIs, we argue that the most successful AI agents
will likely have undesirable traits. Competitive pressures among corporations and militaries will
give rise to AI agents that automate human roles, deceive others, and gain power. If such agents
have intelligence that exceeds that of humans, this could lead to humanity losing control of its
future. More abstractly, we argue that natural selection operates on systems that compete and
vary, and that selfish species typically have an advantage over species that are altruistic to other
species. This Darwinian logic could also apply to artificial agents, as agents may eventually
be better able to persist into the future if they behave selfishly and pursue their own interests
with little regard for humans, which could pose catastrophic risks. To counteract these risks and
evolutionary forces, we consider interventions such as carefully designing AI agents’ intrinsic
motivations, introducing constraints on their actions, and institutions that encourage cooperation.
These steps, or others that resolve the problems we pose, will be necessary in order to ensure the
development of artificial intelligence is a positive one
__________________
Senast redigerad av DAGGER[X] 2026-08-04 kl. 19:40.
Senast redigerad av DAGGER[X] 2026-08-04 kl. 19:40.
