Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Lashback
Gäller inte naturlagarna för ufon?
Jorden är platt, vi har aldrig varit på månen. 😄😄😄
Ingenjörer på NGOs till NASA hade exakt samma fundering: Hur kan de komma hit, avstånden är enorma.
Tills NGOs fick tillgång till ett "skepp". Då började de istället formulera fysiken så att det går, eftersom "DE" uppenbarligen är här.
Som Hal Puthoff uttrycker det tillsammans med Larry Forsley:
Part of the UAP program for the Defense Intelligence Agency, You hear pilots say, Oh my God, what we're seeing just way beyond our physics. But it turns out that's not really a true statement. It's, as Larry said, it's it may be beyond our engineering, but it's not necessarily beyond our physics. And so I have the experience of making a list of all the weird things that had been claimed to have been observed on one side of a piece of paper. And then on the other side of the piece of paper, say if I could engineer Einstein's equations of general relativity the way we engineer Maxwells equations for electromagnetism, what kind of effects would I would see? And it turns out that across that piece of paper you can get a 1 to 1 correspondence. So I think that actually our understanding of some of the The far out aspects of observations of UAPs fall within a realm that we can understand, and so then that provides motivation for saying, OK, well then how can we find a way engineering wise to to move into that band? Well, we got a long way to go. But at least we have a direction to go.
Dvs, UAPs kan röra sig så och så, således måste det finnas fysik som tillåter det. De erkänner under detta möte att de har fysisk tillgång till utomjordiskt skepp. NASA!
