Tråden om Chemtrails [sammanslagen tråd]

man kan ju t.om söka jobb hos dom. det låter som en otrolig framgångssaga för två svenska nördar. så varför är dom så hemliga? klart suspekt.

eller så är dom just väl hemlighållna.

känns det bättre om jag säger 747?

enligt wikipedia har endast två artiklar blivit avpublicerade. och motiveringarna var knappast övertygande.

följande artikel har exempelvis inte avpublicerats vad jag kan se:

Aluminum poisoning of humanity and Earth’s biota by clandestine geoengineering activity: implications for India

”During the period between July 2011 and November 2012, 73 rainwater samples were collected and analysed for aluminum and barium; 71 were collected from 60 different locations in Germany, 1 from France and 1 from Austria. Aluminum was detected in 77% of the rainwater samples, at an average concentration of 17.68 ug/l. The average barium concentration was found to be 3.38 ug/l.

[…]

The range of Al/Ba values for the rainwater and coal fly ash leachate is virtually indistinguishable, even though the rainwater samples were collected at different times, in different locations, under different degrees of toxic aerosol emplacement, and the coal fly ash samples varied by location and composition.
[...]

The data presented above constitute evidence that coal fly ash is the principal material being employed in clandestine geoengineering activities for a period of at least 15 years in America and for unknown periods in Western Europe, New Zealand, and perhaps elsewhere. Such clandestine geoengineering activities have exposed humanity and Earth’s biota to highly mobilized aluminum, a toxic substance not generally found in the natural environment and one for which no natural immunity had evolved. During the period of coal fly ash utilization for clandestine geoengineering, aluminum-implicated neurological diseases showed explosive growth profiles, including autism, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, ADHD and others, as well as manifold destruction of plant and animal life. Highly mobilized aluminum from the geoengineering-dispersed coal fly ash, I posit, is the cause.
[...]

I suggest that the primary source of highly mobile aluminum is aerosolized coal fly ash. This suggestion is relatively easy to verify by taking rainwater samples and analysing them for aluminum, barium and strontium. If aerosolized coal fly ash is indeed verified as the major source of highly mobile aluminum, then another more difficult question should be addressed: What proportion of the aerosolized coal fly ash derives from clandestine geoengineering activities and what proportion comes from industrial coal burning in India?"

https://www.currentscience.ac.in/Volumes/108/12/2173.pdf

från 2013:

Needed: Research Guidelines for Solar Radiation Management

”a small fleet of specially designed aircraft could deliver enough mass to the stratosphere in the form of small reflecting particles to offset all of the warming anticipated by the end of this century for a cost of less than $10 billion per year”

https://issues.org/morgan-3/

Och koppling till chemtrails är vad? Med tanke på hur mycket människan skitar ned och mängden kolkraftverk i Europa vore det ju närmast en sensation om man inte fan spår av kolaska i regnvatten.


Varken Kirby eller Herndon har inte gjort några efterforskningar på "chemtrails".

Hur är det med läsförståelsen? I det du länkar till står inget om att strecken vi ser bakom flygplan är "chemtrails". Tvärtom så framgår det tydligt att det handlar om möjliga framtida strategier

SRI kan komma att användas.

Lol... nej verkligen inte.

Vad som skulle kännas bättre är att ni fotograferar dessa mystiska flygplan och de hemliga flygplatser de startar ifrån. Att ingen någonsin har lyckats få syn på vare sig flygplanen eller flygplatserna är ganska talande.

kopplingen är att man i Europa fångar upp denna aska innan den lämnar kraftverkets skorstenar genom elektrostatiska och andra metoder.


Fly ash is captured after coal combustion by filters (bag houses), electrostatic precipitators and other air pollution control devices.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coal_combustion_products

eller så pågår det redan och man behöver på något sätt introducera och försvara verksamheten för allmänheten.


"Modern commercial weather modification technology began with the 1946 discovery that clouds, seeded with silver iodide or dry ice, could be caused in many instances to yield rain or snow. That weather modification method is widely used for agricultural and other commercial purposes. Ski resorts frequently use it to increase the likelihood of snow. Insurance companies use it to cut their risks when guaranteeing certain weather conditions for commercial projects or to minimize potential losses caused by hail storms.

[...]
A profound dichotomy exists between the technology, practice, terminology, and public disclosure of geoengineering so that public discussion of its implications for public health is minimized. The academic community describes geoengineering as a possible future intervention in the upper atmosphere (stratosphere) to counteract anthropogenic global warming.
[...]
Academic scientists postulate future geoengineering in which substances such as sulfuric acid or titanium dioxide are sprayed into the stratosphere in order to block a portion of incident sunlight.
[...]

Within the academic perception of hypothetical geoengineering, public health concerns arising from geoengineering are also hypothetical, something that may become important in the future if and when stratospheric geoengineering is put into practice.

In contrast to the presumption of academic geoengineers, covert government/military geoengineering activity has occurred over the past 70 years and has intensified since the end of the Cold War and the discovery of global warming as a national security issue. Currently, geoengineering is taking place in the troposphere (lower atmosphere) over a large number of countries, including the United States, Canada, the European Union countries, England, Australia, and New Zealand. The academic community has been hesitant to publically acknowledge military geoengineering activity even though there is abundant observational evidence for its existence."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4927569/

Självklart är ingen rökgasrening 100% effektiv. Och människan har skitat ned jorden med allt från kolkraftverk till bilmotorer i över hundra år. Så det är såklart omöjligt att du inte hittar skit i regnvatten eller marksediment - och detta helt utan påhittade "chemtrails".

Eller så är chemtrails en av de dummaste konspirationsteorierna som det totalt saknas stöd för.

kolkraftverk finns ju inte överallt. det finns platser där man inte borde se någon kontaminering av kolaska. trots detta kan man alltså hitta ämnen som i sina inbördes proportioner stämmer väl överens med vad man i oberoende experiment funnit när kolaska urlakas i vatten.

dessutom hittas samma typ av kontaminering i s.k HEPA luftfilter.

”The author has lived in San Diego, California (USA) for more than 40 years and as a trained scientist keenly observes the sky. For many years before the near-daily particulate spraying, the sky overhead was a rich azure blue color, frequently without clouds. In the warm dry air above San Diego, jet contrails are a rare sight that disappear in a matter of seconds to minutes, becoming invisible gas.
[...]

”Before the near-daily aerial spraying in San Diego, California (USA), [...] on many days of the year the skies were blue, cloudless and without the white haze that is the consequence of the aerial spraying; now, the visual effects of the spraying are clearly evident. The author collected San Diego rainwater samples in February, May, and December 2015 for analysis. San Diego is ideal for rainwater sample collection as there are no coal-burning facilities nearby or in the path of prevailing winds and there are no heavy industries to cause air borne pollution in San Diego. The residence-time for smokestack particulates in the boundary layer, a few days at most, is too short for coal fly ash to arrive from China via low-level transport, which takes longer than 10 days. Further, the observed aerial particulate density, at times sufficient to cause artificial overcast, is related to observed aircraft spraying activities, and is not present in the absence of aerial activity.”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4927569/